BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 468| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 445-6614 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: SB 468 Author: Kehoe (D) Amended: 5/31/11 Vote: 21 SENATE NATURAL RES. AND WATER COMMITTEE : 5-3, 4/12/11 AYES: Pavley, Evans, Kehoe, Padilla, Wolk NOES: La Malfa, Cannella, Fuller NO VOTE RECORDED: Simitian SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE : 6-2, 5/3/11 AYES: DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Lowenthal, Pavley, Rubio, Simitian NOES: Gaines, Harman NO VOTE RECORDED: Huff SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 6-2, 5/26/11 AYES: Kehoe, Alquist, Lieu, Pavley, Price, Steinberg NOES: Walters, Runner NO VOTE RECORDED: Emmerson SUBJECT : Department of Transportation: capacity-increasing state highway projects: coastal zone SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill prescribes coordinated duties for the Department of Transportation, the San Diego Association of Governments, and the California Coastal Commission with CONTINUED SB 468 Page 2 respect to a 40-year plan for transportation improvements in the coastal zone in San Diego County known collectively as the north coast corridor project. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1. Provides that the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has full possession and control of the state highway system. 2. Imposes various requirements for the development and implementation of transportation projects. 3. Authorizes San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to conduct, administer, and operate a value pricing high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane program on 2 corridors included in the high-occupancy vehicle lane system in San Diego County. This bill: 1. Requires Caltrans and SANDAG to prepare a "public works plan" (PWP) for submittal to the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The PWP is an expedited process that describes, evaluates, and provides mitigation for highway, transit, multimodal and community enhancement projects within the north coast corridor project (NCCP). 2. Requires Caltrans, SANDAG, and the CCC to work cooperatively toward completing all design approvals, reviews, determinations, and permitting for the NCCP on an expedited basis. 3. Requires Caltrans and SANDAG to perform all work in conformance with the phasing program specified in the PWP, unless otherwise approved by the CCC. 4. Requires Caltrans and SANDAG to comply with specified requirements for any elements of the NCCP that are in the coastal zone, including: collaboration with all stakeholders to ensure inclusion of multimodal transportation options; require the "8+4" Buffer Alternative as the preferred alternative for State Highway Route (SR) 5 improvements; require concurrent CONTINUED SB 468 Page 3 construction of rail and highway bridges crossing lagoons; ongoing monitoring of environmental consequences of the projects; and concurrent construction of highway improvements, multimodal projects, and environmental mitigation and enhancement projects in each phase. 5. Authorizes SANDAG to conduct, administer, and operate HOT lanes on SR 5, and requires all revenues from the HOT lanes to be used for transit improvements and high-occupancy vehicle facilities in the SR 5 corridor. Background Caltrans is responsible for the development, operations, maintenance, and reconstruction of state highways, and it also plans and operates through contracts with Amtrak, California's intercity passenger rail service. When Caltrans develops capacity increasing projects, it usually carries out this activity in concert with the regional transportation planning agency for the area in which the project is located. SANDAG is the regional transportation planning agency for the County of San Diego, a single county planning region. SANDAG is responsible for long-term, multi-modal transportation planning, the prioritization transportation projects, and developing fundable transportation capital outlay program. SANDAG also oversees the operation of public transportation services in the county. CCC, established by voter initiative in 1972 (Proposition 20) and later made permanent when the Legislature adopted the California Coastal Act of 1976, is a twelve member, independent, quasi-judicial state agency with regulatory responsibility for permitting projects constructed in the coastal zone. It oversees the implementation of various policies that address issues such as shoreline public access and recreation, lower cost visitor accommodations, terrestrial and marine habitat protection, visual resources, landform alteration, agricultural lands, commercial fisheries, industrial uses, water quality, offshore oil and gas development, transportation investments, development design, power plants, ports, and CONTINUED SB 468 Page 4 public works. The Coastal Act establishes a band along the state's coastline that varies in width from several hundred feet in urban areas to as much as five miles inland in rural areas of the state, which constitutes the jurisdiction of the commission. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Fund Caltrans state operations Unknown moderate increase in staff Special* costs associated with prescribed coordination duties Caltrans capital costs Unknown costs or savings as a result Special* of phasing requirements Coastal Commission Likely minor costs related to General prescribed duties admin * State Highway Account SUPPORT : (Verified 5/27/11) Alliance of Citizens to Improve Oceanside Neighborhoods California Public Interest Research Group City of Del Mar City of Oceanside, Deputy Mayor City of Solana Beach International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569 San Diego Move San Diego San Diego County Democratic Party Save Our Forest and Ranch Lands Sierra Club of California Sustainable San Diego Torrey Pines Community Planning Board CONTINUED SB 468 Page 5 OPPOSITION : (Verified 5/27/11) American Council of Engineering Companies of California Associated Builders and Contractors San Diego Chamber of Carlsbad City of Carlsbad City of Oceanside City of San Marcos Professional Engineers in California Government San Diego Association of Governments ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : The author introduced this bill in response to the proposed widening of Interstate 5 (I-5) in San Diego County. This bill applies to the entire coastal zone, but the most significant highway project is the San Diego project. In November 2010, the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee held an informational hearing on the project, which over 200 people attended, in Solana Beach, a city in the NCCP area. Caltrans, SANDAG, and the chair of the Air Resources Board participated. In comments to Caltrans on the I-5 draft environmental impact report (DEIR), the author wrote: "Simply proposing to construct wider freeways to get us through the next 40 years will not do when the level of service would not be improved to a significant level. The public clearly wants realistic transit options and is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, as evidence by the strong vote in November, 2010, rejecting Proposition 23 that would have suspended implementation of AB 32 in California". The initiation and development of highway projects is a joint effort between Caltrans and the local regional transportation planning agency, SANDAG in the case of improvements to I-5 in San Diego. I-5 is an important interregional and intracounty highway. Currently, about 200,000 vehicles use the highway on a daily basis, and SANDAG forecasts in 2030 that usage will increase to 300,000 vehicles, a 50 percent increase. Caltrans and SANDAG initiated defining various freeway improvement options in late 1997, with Caltrans approving the actual project alternatives in January, 2000. The environmental analysis of the project alternatives began in 2004. Today, CONTINUED SB 468 Page 6 the travel time during commute hours from end-to-end of the 27 mile corridor is 38 minutes. If no improvements are made, SANDAG forecasts the travel time to be 70 minutes in 2030. On the other hand, if a fourteen-lane freeway (ten conventional lanes and for managed lanes) is constructed, the travel time will be 37 minutes, while constructing a twelve lane freeway, travel time will increase to 45 minutes. The passenger rail service is expected to offer 32 minute service. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : SANDAG argues that this bill halts construction of any new highway project in the coastal zone, resulting in the region being unable to accommodate expected growth. In addition, I-5 is an interregional highway and any constraints placed on its development would serve to limit commerce, especially trade with Mexico. In addition, I-5 will include managed lanes that are part of the region's strategy to address greenhouse gases and implement SB 375 (Steinberg), Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008. The PWP, which is jointly being developed by Caltrans and SANDAG for the commission review process, is underway and no legislation related to that process is necessary. CTW:kc 5/31/11 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED