BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                          SB 493 (Padilla)
          
          Hearing Date: 5/26/2011         Amended: 4/26/2011
          Consultant: Bob Franzoia        Policy Vote: G O 9-3
          
















































          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: SB 493, an urgency measure, would revise 
          requirements on the Department of General Services (DGS) 
          regarding disposal of state surplus computers, laptops, 
          monitors, and related computer equipment, as provided.  
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2011-12     2012-13       2013-14     Fund
           
          State surplus computer sales      Unknown, potentially up to $50 
          or more                General*
                                 in lost revenue annually, potentially
                                 negligible
                                                                  
          * Service Revolving Fund (a combination of General Funds and 
          special funds) plus minor other General Fund and special fund 
          losses
          ** Service Revolving Fund
          _________________________________________________________________
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE.  AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED. 

          The state received federal ARRA funds which were distributed in 
          2010 as grants by the Public Utilities Commission for broadband 
          infrastructure projects and public computer centers.  Of the 
          grant recipients, preliminary information indicates three (of 
          six) have a school district affiliation. 

          Under current law, DGS shall first offer appropriate state 
          surplus personal property to school districts prior to offering 
          that property to the public, except for property with public 
          safety uses.  DGS may offer school districts state surplus 
          personal property at less than fair market value, if it is 
          determined to be in the best interests of the state pursuant to 
          DGS policies and procedures.  When it is not cost effective for 
          state agencies to transport surplus property to Sacramento for 
          auction, or the property is not suitable for sale, authority can 
          be requested to dispose of that property.  One disposition 
          method is to donate computers to school programs.

          The number of state surplus computers may be sold to the grant 
          recipients and at what amount less than fair market value is 








          SB 493 (Padilla)
          Page 3

          unknown.  If these grant recipients can now purchase retail a 
          new desktop (estimated $500) or laptop (estimated $300) computer 
          with software and warranty, state surplus computers would have 
          to be price competitive before this bill has a fiscal impact.  

          DGS surplus property auctions which were scheduled on a monthly 
          basis are now being scheduled bi-monthly. The following is data 
          from the January 2011 auction:


           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |Hardware type   |Number sold  |Total sales     |Average price per |
          |                |             |                |unit              |
          |----------------+-------------+----------------+------------------|
          |CPUs            |390          |$15,235.00      |$39.06            |
          |----------------+-------------+----------------+------------------|
          |Laptops         |29           |$4,125.00       |$142.24           |
          |----------------+-------------+----------------+------------------|
          |Monitors        |83           |$4,145.00       |$49.94            |
           ------------------------------------------------------------------ 

          For CPUs (central processing units) and laptops, the hard drives 
          have been wiped clean to erase any sensitive data and are no 
          longer equipped with any software, including a basic operating 
          system.  Each CPU or laptop has been tested for function and 
          each one will boot up to the C prompt. 

          If a state surplus computer (desktop and monitor) had a fair 
          market value of $100, for every 100 computers sold pursuant to 
          this bill, at 10 percent, 50 percent or 90 percent less than 
          fair market value, the loss of revenue would be  $1,000 ($100 x 
          100 = $10,000 x 0.10), $5,000, or $9,000.  Assuming surplus 
          sales were made at 50 percent of fair market value, sale of 
          1,000 computers at this price and configuration would be needed 
          to incur a revenue loss of $50,000 (assuming all computers were 
          purchased by the same fund).  As noted, this estimate would be 
          affected by demand from non-school district bidders, retail and 
          wholesale options, and disposition of computers directly to 
          school districts. 

          DGS would be required to report on its implementation of this 
          bill and recommend whether other nonprofit organizations working 
          to close the digital divide among low income populations, as 
          specified, should be eligible for state surplus computers at 
          less than fair market value.  This report does not appear to be 








          SB 493 (Padilla)
          Page 4

          cost effective.

          The proposed amendment strikes the requirement that DGS 
          coordinate the disposition of state surplus computers with the 
          Federal Surplus Property Program (page 3, lines 20-21).