BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 507 (DeSaulnier)
          As Amended  July 1, 2011
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :21-13  
          
           REVENUE & TAXATION  6-3         APPROPRIATIONS      12-5        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Perea, Beall, Charles     |Ayes:|Fuentes, Blumenfield,     |
          |     |Calderon, Cedillo,        |     |Bradford, Charles         |
          |     |Fuentes, Wieckowski       |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |
          |     |                          |     |Gatto, Hall, Hill, Lara,  |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Solorio         |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Donnelly, Harkey,         |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |
          |     |Nestande                  |     |Nielsen, Norby, Wagner    |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Extends from 45 days to 90 days the deadline for new 
          owners of real property and certain legal entities to submit a 
          change-in-ownership or a change-in-control statement and 
          increases the penalty for failure to file a change-in-ownership 
          statement in the case of real property transfers that must be 
          reported to the local county assessor.  Specifically,  this bill  : 
            

          1)Extends from 45 days to 90 days the time period to file:

             a)   A change-in-ownership statement (COS) required to be 
               filed by a new property owner for real property transfers 
               that must be reported to the local county assessor; 

             b)   A Legal Entity Ownership Program (LEOP) COS or a 
               change-in-control statement required to be mailed by a 
               legal entity to the State Board of Equalization (BOE); or,

             c)   A response to a BOE written request for a legal entity 
               to file a LEOP COS or change in control statement.  

          2)Increases the maximum penalty for failure by a new property 
            owner to timely file a COS, upon request from the assessor 








                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  2


            from: 

             a)   $2,500 to $5,000 for all property eligible for the 
               homeowners' exemption; and, 

             b)   $2,500 to $20,000 for property not eligible for the 
               homeowners' exemption.

          3)Clarifies that the penalty imposed on a legal entity for 
            failure to file a LEOP COS with the BOE is to be levied by the 
            assessor. 

          4)Requires the assessor to identify, in his/her written request 
            for a COS, the real property or manufactured home for which 
            the statement is required to be filed and requires the notice 
            of penalty to identify the parcel or parcels for which the 
            penalty is assessed.

          5)Clarifies that the penalty applies if either the new owner or 
            a legal entity submits an incomplete form and does not supply 
            missing information upon a second request from the assessor or 
            BOE, whichever is applicable. 

          6)Provides that a penalty imposed on a legal entity for failure 
            to file a LEOP COS may be abated by the county assessor 
            responsible for assessing the penalty, if the entity, within 
            60 days of the notice of penalty, notifies both the BOE and 
            the assessor that the request was based on erroneous 
            information.  Authorizes the county BOE or assessment appeals 
            board, instead of the county board of supervisors, to order 
            the penalty abated, as provided, and makes related changes.

          7)Specifies all of the following:

             a)   The address to which the assessor must mail his/her 
               request for a COS statement or a notice of a penalty for 
               failure to file such statement;  

             b)   That the 90-day period, within which a new owner is 
               required to file the statement, begins with the date of the 
               mailing, rather than the date of the written request; and,

             c)   That the postmark date will serve as the date on which 
               the property owner is deemed to have filed the statement. 








                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  3



          8)Imposes a state-mandated local program and provides that, if 
            the Commission on State Mandates determines that this bill 
            contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those 
            costs shall be made as specified. 

           EXISTING LAW :

          1)Provides that all property is taxable, unless otherwise 
            provided by the California Constitution or federal laws.  
            ÝCalifornia Constitution, Article XIII, Section 1(a)].  Limits 
            ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of the full cash value 
            of that property (Proposition 13).  Requires real property to 
            be reassessed to its current fair market value whenever a 
            "change in ownership" occurs.  ÝCalifornia Constitution, 
            Article XIII A, Section 2; Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) 
            Sections 60 - 69.5].  Provides that "change in ownership" 
            includes a transfer of any interest in real property between a 
            corporation, partnership, or other legal entity and a 
            shareholder, partner or any other person.  ÝR&TC Section 
            61(j)].   


          2)Specifies in RT&C Sections 60-69.5 what constitutes "a change 
            in ownership."  Sets forth the general rule that, when real 
            property is owned by a legal entity, the purchase or transfer 
            of ownership interests in that entity does not trigger a 
            change in ownership of the property, unless:  a) there is a 
            "change in control" of the legal entity; or, b) one person or 
            entity acquires more than 50% of the ownership interest of the 
            entity.  ÝR&TC Section 64].  Thus, when any person or entity 
            obtains control, through direct or indirect ownership or 
            control, of more than 50% of the voting stock of a 
            corporation, or a majority ownership interest in any other 
            type of legal entity, a reassessment of real property owned by 
            the acquired legal entity (or any of its subsidiaries) is 
            triggered.  ÝR&TC Section 64(c)(1)(A)].  Furthermore, when 
            voting stock or other ownership interests representing 
            cumulatively more than 50% of the total interest in a legal 
            entity is transferred by any of the "original co-owners" in 
            one or more transactions, the real property that was 
            previously excluded from reappraisal will be reassessed.  
            ÝR&TC Section 64(d)].  









                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  4


          3)Provides specific exemptions from reassessment for 
            intra-family transfers, replacement residences of senior 
            citizens and disabled persons, and specific types of home 
            improvements.


          4)Requires an owner to file a COS within 45 days of acquiring 
            real property located in California.  However, it requires the 
            assessor to make a written request of the property owner for a 
            COS and precludes the imposition of the penalty, unless the 
            property owner fails to provide the COS within 45 days after 
            the written notice.  Imposes a penalty for failure to timely 
            file a COS, after receiving a written request from the local 
            county assessor.  The penalty is equal to the greater of $100 
            or 10% of the property tax that would be due, where such 
            failure is not willful.  Limits the penalty to $2,500 for all 
            properties.  

          5)Provides that, as an alternative to a COS, the new owner may 
            file a preliminary change-in- ownership report (PCOR), which 
            is nearly identical to the COS, at the time the deed for 
            change-in-ownership is recorded.  

          6)Requires a person who acquires control or ownership of legal 
            entities that own property to self-report a change in control 
            and file a COS with the BOE.  Imposes a penalty for failure to 
            self-report within 45 days of the event that triggers the 
            change in control or a change in ownership.  The penalty 
            amount equals 10% of the taxes applicable to the new base year 
            value reflecting the change in control or change in ownership 
            of the real property owned by the legal entity. 

          7)Provides that the BOE may abate the penalty if the assesse:  
            a) establishes to the satisfaction of the board that the 
            failure to file the COS as required was due to reasonable 
            cause and not due to willful neglect; and, b) has filed the 
            statement with the assessor and filed with the board a written 
            application for abatement of the penalty no later than 60 days 
            after being notified of the penalty.  Specifies that, in those 
            counties that have adopted a special resolution, the penalty 
            may be automatically abated if the assessee files the COS with 
            the assessor no later than 60 days after being notified of the 
            penalty. 









                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  5


          8)Prescribes the specific contents of the form to be used to 
            report a change of ownership or control. 

           FISCAL EFFECT :  According to the BOE staff, this bill will have 
          no direct impact on General Fund revenue.  

           COMMENTS  :   

           The author's statement  .  The author states that, "A property 
          owner's failure to report changes in ownership, willful or not, 
          has greatly reduced the ability of county assessors and the BOE 
          to efficiently process these changes.  It is time to increase 
          the penalty for non-compliance so as to encourage timely 
          response to requests for information, should a preliminary 
          change in ownership be incomplete or should a county assessor or 
          the BOE require additional information for processing.  The 
          purpose of this legislation is not to generate revenue for 
          assessors' offices; rather the penalty increase is an attempt to 
          encourage timely filing of the Change of Ownership Statement 
          (COS).  Taxpayers often view the low penalty as an opportunity 
          to postpone timely filing of the COS to delay paying appropriate 
          property taxes. The increase in the penalty is an attempt to 
          eliminate the financial advantage of late filing and to 
          facilitate timely payment of property taxes."

           Arguments in support  .  The proponents state that this bill would 
          encourage "compliance with existing property tax law by 
          extending the time period for filing a change in ownership 
          statement, and increasing the cap on the penalty charged upon 
          failure to file."  They argue that for "properties valued over 
          $2.5 and $10 million, respectfully, taxpayers often view the low 
          penalty as an opportunity to postpone timely filing of the COS 
          ÝChange in Ownership Statement] and delay paying appropriate 
          property taxes."  The proponents contend that the "increase in 
          penalty on those properties ? is an attempt to eliminate the 
          financial advantage of late filing and to facilitate timely 
          payment of property taxes."  

           COS: Transfers of real property  .  A COS is a statement that must 
          be filed by a buyer of real property or of a manufactured home 
          with the county in which the property or manufactured home is 
          located.  Most buyers, however, file a PCOR at the time the 
          transfer of property is recorded by the county recorder, and 
          thus, are not required to file a COS, which is almost identical 








                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  6


          to a PCOR.   Both COS and PCOR provide the local county assessor 
          with the information necessary to value the transferred property 
          and to determine whether the transfer of property qualifies for 
          one of the many "change-in-ownership" exclusions from property 
          reassessment.  

          Generally, if a buyer has not filed a PCOR, he/she is required 
          to file a COS.  However, no penalty for failure to file a COS is 
          imposed on the buyer, unless the assessor makes a written 
          request and the buyer fails to respond within 45 days of that 
          request.  The penalty equals to the greater of $100 or 10% of 
          the property taxes due on the property and is capped at $2,500 
          in the case of a non-willful failure.  Thus, as noted by the BOE 
          staff, at the basic 1% tax rate, the maximum penalty threshold 
          of $2,500 applies to any property with a new base year value in 
          excess of $2.5 million.  But, if the failure to file is deemed 
          willful, the $2,500 cap does not apply and the penalty equals 
          10% of the property's new base year value. 

           LEOP COS: Transfers of ownership interests in legal entities  .  
          Generally, properties owned by legal entities are taxed under a 
          "separate entity" theory, which means that transfers of 
          interests in legal entities do not constitute changes in 
          ownership of the real property owned by those legal entities.  
          Thus, as long as the property is owned by the same legal entity, 
          it would not be reassessed, even if most or all of the ownership 
          interests in the entity (i.e., stock in the corporation, 
          partners in the partnership) had changed ownership.  However, 
          the existing law prescribes two exceptions to this general rule. 
           First, when a person or an entity obtains control, through 
          direct or indirect ownership, of more than 50% of the interest 
          in any type of legal entity, a reassessment of all real property 
          owned by the acquired legal entity as of the date of the change 
          in control is triggered.  Secondly, a similar reassessment is 
          triggered when ownership interests representing cumulatively 
          more than 50% of the total interests in a legal entity are 
          transferred by any of the "original co-owners" in one or more 
          transactions. 

          Often, assessors are unaware when changes in the ownership of a 
          legal entity occur, as they rely only on changes in title 
          information supplied by the local county recorder.  In 1983, as 
          explained in the BOE analysis of this bill, BOE created the LEOP 
          to help track potential reassessments.  Under this program, 








                                                                  SB 507
                                                                 Page  7


          legal entities are required to report to the BOE a change in 
          ownership when an entity acquires more than a 50% ownership 
          interest in another legal entity.  Apparently, the form used to 
          report the change in control is substantively different from a 
          COS (although both are referred to as 'COS').  To differentiate 
          between those two types of statements, the BOE refers to the 
          latter as a LEOP COS, which is required to be filed with the 
          BOE, instead of the local assessor's office. 

          The reports help assessors to find and detect changes in control 
          and ownership of corporations, partnerships, and other legal 
          entities, which have no recorded deed or notice of a transfer of 
          an ownership interest in a legal entity.   Under LEOP, the 
          Franchise Tax Board sends to the BOE a list of legal entities 
          that have reported a change in control or change in ownership on 
          income tax returns, which allows BOE to analyze completed 
          statements to determine changes in control or ownership and 
          notify county assessors of those changes.  

          Thus, similarly to the filing requirements applicable to buyers 
          of real property, a person or legal entity that acquires control 
          of another legal entity is responsible for filing a LEOP COS 
          within 45 days of the event that triggers a change in control or 
          change in ownership.  A penalty applies if the legal entity 
          fails to self-report a change in ownership and control to BOE, 
          as specified.  The penalty amount equals 10% of the amount of 
          property tax calculated taking into account the new base year 
          value of property and is not subject to a cap.  The penalty 
          would be imposed when and if the BOE discovers a potential 
          change in control or ownership and mails a written request for a 
          LEOP COS.  The legal entity is required to respond within 45 
          days of the mailing.  Notably, the penalty would apply 
          regardless of whether or not a change in control or a change in 
          ownership actually occurred.  However, it may be imposed only 
          one time, even though the BOE or assessor may initiate a request 
          as often as he/she deems necessary.

           What does this bill do  ?  Among other things, SB 507 would allow 
          buyers of real property or manufactured homes more time to file 
          a COS, before the penalty will apply, by extending the period 
          within which the buyer must respond to an assessor's written 
          request from 45 days to 90 days.  But, at the same time, it 
          would increase the maximum penalty amount for non-compliance 
          from $2,500 to $5,000, in the case of properties eligible for 








                                                                  SB 507
                                                                  Page  8


          the homeowner's exemption, and to $20,000, in the case of all 
          other properties. 

          Secondly, this bill would also extend from 45 days to 90 days 
          the time period within which a legal entity must self-report a 
          change in ownership or change in control to the BOE and to 
          respond to a BOE's written request to file a LEOP COS.  This 
          bill does not change the amount of penalty imposed for failure 
          to file a LEOP COS with the BOE.  It states, however, that the 
          penalty also applies when an incomplete LEOP COS is filed and a 
          second request to complete this statement is not satisfied.  
          Finally, it clarifies the county assessor's authority to levy 
          this penalty and to abate it if a BOE's request for the 
          statement was based on erroneous information. 


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Oksana Jaffe / REV. & TAX. / (916) 
          319-2098 




                                                                FN: 0001976