BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 551
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing: June 29, 2011

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                                Cameron Smyth, Chair
                   SB 551 (DeSaulnier) - As Amended:  May 31, 2011

           SENATE VOTE  :  39-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  State property: tidelands transfer: City of Pittsburg.

           SUMMARY  :  Repeals the 2006 public trust grant made to the City 
          of Pittsburg (City) and makes a new grant that includes the 
          lands from the 2006 grant as well as lands annexed to the City 
          in 2009.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Repeals the 2006 grant made by AB 2324 (Canciamilla), Chapter 
            275, Statutes of 2006, and makes a new grant to the City that 
            includes the lands from the 2006 grant as well as lands 
            annexed to the City on December 31, 2009.  

          2)Provides, in the new grant, the following:

             a)   A requirement that the City must submit a trust lands 
               use plan by January 1, 2017, to the State Lands Commission 
               (Commission).

             b)   Authorization for the City to lease trust lands for 
               limited periods not to exceed 49 years; and,

             c)   A requirement for the City to report to the Commission 
               every five years, beginning in 2022, regarding the 
               utilization of trust lands for the five preceding years.

          3)Requires the trust lands use plan to consist of a plan, 
            program, or other document that includes all of the following:

             a)   A general description of the type of uses planned or 
               proposed for the trust lands shown on a map or aerial 
               photograph;

             b)   The projected statewide benefit to be derived from the 
               planned or proposed uses of the trust lands;

             c)   The proposed method of financing the planned or proposed 
               uses of the trust lands, including estimated capital costs, 








                                                                  SB 551
                                                                  Page  2

               annual operating costs, and anticipated annual trust 
               revenues;

             d)   An estimated timetable for implementation of the trust 
               lands use plan or any phase of the plan; and,

             e)   A description of how the trustee proposes to protect and 
               preserve natural and manmade resources and facilities 
               located on trust lands and operated in connection with the 
               use of the trust lands, including, but not limited to, 
               addressing impacts from sea level rise.

          4)Requires the City, at the end of every fiscal year beginning 
            on June 30, 2012, to transmit 20% of all gross revenue 
            generated from the trust lands to the Commission, and provides 
            that of this amount, 80% will be deposited in the General Fund 
            and the remaining 20% will be deposited in the Land Bank Fund.

           EXISTING LAW  :

             1)   Protects, pursuant to the common law Public Trust 
               Doctrine, the public's right to use California's waterways 
               for commerce, navigation, fishing, boating, natural habitat 
               protection, and other water oriented activities.  The 
               Public Trust Doctrine provides that filled and unfilled 
               tide and submerged lands and the beds of lakes, streams, 
               and other navigable waterways (i.e. public trust lands) are 
               to be held in trust by the state for the benefit of the 
               people of California.  

          2)Establishes the Commission is the steward and manager of the 
            state's public trust lands.  

          3)Grants, in trust, state public trust lands to over 80 local 
            public agencies (a.k.a. local trustees or grantees) to be 
            managed for the benefit of all the people of the state and 
            pursuant to the Public Trust Doctrine and terms of the 
            applicable granting statutes.  

          4)Provides that the Commission has oversight authority over 
            these granted public trust lands to ensure that they are 
            managed pursuant to the Public Trust Doctrine and relevant 
            granting statutes.

             5)   Grants, pursuant to Chapter 214, Statutes of 1937, 








                                                                  SB 551
                                                                  Page  3

               Chapter 1835, Statutes of 1961, and Chapter 1828, Statutes 
               of 1963, portions of state tide and submerged lands to the 
               City for public trust purposes.

             6)   AB 2324 (Canciamilla):

             a)   Repealed existing legislative grants to the City and 
               enacted a new grant, subject to specified conditions and 
               public trust restrictions.

             b)   Defined "trust lands" to mean all tidelands and 
               submerged lands, whether filled or unfilled, situated 
               within the boundaries of the City as such boundaries exist 
               on January 1, 2007.

             c)   Required the City, on or before July 1, 2008, to submit 
               to the Commission for approval a plan of intended 
               development, preservation, or other use of the trust lands, 
               including the projected statewide financial, environmental, 
               or other benefits of the proposed uses of the trust lands, 
               the method of financing the plan, and a timetable for 
               implementation.

             d)   Authorized the City to lease the trust lands for periods 
               not exceeding 66 years, for purposes consistent with the 
               public trust and the development plan; the City may collect 
               and retain rents and other trust revenues from those 
               leases, but can only use them for purposes consistent with 
               the trust.

             e)   Directed the revenue generated from four specific 
               parcels to the General Fund rather than the City.

             f)   Set forth oversight, accounting, enforcement, and 
               revenue sharing provisions required of the City and 
               administered by the Commission.

             7)   Establishes the Land Bank Fund for which the Commission 
               is the trustee.  

             8)   Allows the Land Bank Fund to receive funds for 
               mitigation or from title settlements, and allows the Land 
               Bank Fund to receive revenues from any party for the 
               purpose of providing management and improvement of real 
               property held by the Commission for the public trust.








                                                                  SB 551
                                                                  Page  4


           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations 
          Committee, the bill will reduce General Fund revenues by about 
          $330,000 per year.  However, the Commission believes that, over 
          time, the bill will lead to increased state revenues.

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)For over 100 years, the Legislature has granted public trust 
            lands to local public agencies so they can be managed locally 
            for the benefit of the people of California.  The Commission 
            retains oversight authority to ensure that the lands are 
            managed pursuant to the Public Trust Doctrine and the relevant 
            granting statutes.  A granting statute generally explains what 
            lands have been granted and how the land is to be managed by 
            the grantee.  Without a public trust grant, the Commission has 
            direct authority to lease or otherwise manage public trust 
            lands within the jurisdiction of a local public agency.  

          2)The City of Pittsburg pursued AB 2324 in 2006 in response to 
            its desire to control its entire shoreline for the purposes of 
            waterfront economic development.  In 2009, approximately 1,467 
            acres and 17 parcels of public trust lands were annexed to the 
            City.  Since these lands were annexed after AB 2324, they were 
            not part of the grant.  This bill will grant administrative 
            control over these annexed lands to the City so they can be 
            incorporated into the City's shoreline redevelopment plans.

          3)This bill repeals the 2006 grant contained in AB 2324, and 
            instead, makes a new grant to the City that includes the lands 
            from the 2006 grant as well as lands annexed to the city on 
            December 31, 2009.  This new grant is substantially similar to 
            the AB 2324 grant except for the following:  the new grant 
            requires the City to submit a trust lands use plan by January 
            1, 2017 and specifies the contents of the plan, authorizes the 
            City to lease trust lands for a period not to exceed 49 years, 
            and requires the City to transmit 20% of all gross revenues 
            generated from the trust funds, annually beginning on June 30, 
            2012, to the Commission.  Of that 20%, 80% will be deposited 
            in the General Fund, and the remaining 20% will be deposited 
            in the Land Bank Fund.

          4)Support arguments:  Supporters believe that granting land to 
            the City of Pittsburg will allow further development of these 
            resources to be integrated in the city's land use planning and 








                                                                  SB 551
                                                                  Page  5

            will benefit the residents of the city and region as a whole.

            Opposition arguments:  Opposition could argue that the 
            property being swapped by the Commission may be better off 
            remaining in the public's trust instead of being transferred 
            to the City.

          5)This bill is double-referred to the Committees on Natural 
            Resources Committee and Local Government.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          City of Pittsburg ÝSPONSOR]
          Genon Energy, Inc.
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 
          319-3958