BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 561
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 561 (Corbett)
          As Amended June 27, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :Vote not relevant  
           
           JUDICIARY           10-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Wagner, Atkins,    |     |                          |
          |     |Dickinson, Gorell, Huber, |     |                          |
          |     |Jones, Monning,           |     |                          |
          |     |Wieckowski, Chesbro       |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the Alameda County District Attorney's 
          Office and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to collect 
          and post statistical data relating to crimes involving or 
          furthered by the gathering of private information from the 
          Internet.  Specifically,  this bill  :   

          1)Authorizes the Alameda County District Attorney's Office and 
            the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to collect 
            statistical data on arrests and prosecutions involving private 
            information gathered from the Internet that was used in 
            furtherance of a crime committed within its respective 
            jurisdictions.  Specifies that the information may be gathered 
            in the manner that the entity deems appropriate and may focus 
            on crimes in which the victim was a minor.
             
          2)Defines "private information" to mean any information that 
            identifies or describes an individual, including, but not 
            limited to, his or her name, social security number, account 
            numbers, passwords, personal identification numbers, physical 
            description, physical location, home address, home telephone 
            number, education, financial matters, and medical or 
            employment history.  It includes statements made by, or 
            attributed to, the individual.

          3)Requires an entity that collects statistical data as described 
            above to publish that statistical information or post it on 
            the entity's Internet Web site in two installments, as 








                                                                  SB 561
                                                                  Page  2


            specified, on or before July 1, 2013, and on or before January 
            1, 2014.  

          4)Provides that the above shall sunset as January 1, 2015, 
            unless that date is deleted or extended by a later enacted 
            statute. 

           EXISTING LAW  :    

          1)Requires the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to prepare 
            and distribute, as specified, an annual report containing the 
            criminal statistics of the preceding calendar year and to 
            present reports on special aspects of criminal statistics.  

          2)Provides that any person who willfully obtains personal 
            identifying information, as defined, of another person, and 
            uses that information for any unlawful purpose, including to 
            obtain, or attempt to obtain, credit, goods, services, or 
            medical information in the name of the other person without 
            the consent of that person, is guilty of a public offense, and 
            upon conviction therefor, shall be punished by fines or 
            incarceration, or both, as specified.  

          3)Requires the DOJ to establish and maintain a data base of 
            individuals who have been victims of identity theft.  
            Specifies that the DOJ shall provide a victim of identity 
            theft or his or her authorized representative access to the 
            data base in order to establish that the individual has been a 
            victim of identity theft.  Limits access to the data base to 
            criminal justice agencies, victims of identity theft, and 
            individuals and agencies authorized by the victims.  

          4)Specifies that many crimes, including false impersonation, 
            harassment, and stalking, may be committed by electronic 
            means, including by means of a computer or Internet.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None
           
          COMMENTS  :  It is well-known that people are increasingly willing 
          to divulge private information on the Internet, and that other 
          people may try to use that private information for nefarious 
          ends.  Nonetheless, the author claims, law enforcement and 
          policy-makers have "only limited and sporadic information" on 
          the exact extent and nature of Internet-related crimes.  This 








                                                                  SB 561
                                                                  Page  3


          bill seeks to remedy this situation by authorizing the 
          collection of empirical data on the extent of such crimes so 
          that law enforcement and policy-makers may better understand 
          these trends and act accordingly.  This bill is similar in 
          intent to the author's SB 1389 (this session), which would have 
          required the Attorney General to direct local law enforcement 
          agencies throughout the state to report to the Department of 
          Justice information relative to criminal activity that is 
          generated by the misuse of private information gathered from the 
          Internet.  That bill, however, was held in the Senate 
          Appropriations Committee.  The bill presently under 
          consideration is more modest; it creates a pilot program 
          authorizing two counties to collect relevant statistical data 
          and, if they do, the bill requires them to post that statistical 
          data on their Internet Web sites so that aggregate information 
          will also be available to the public.  The two counties 
          authorized to collect and publish the data are, not 
          coincidentally, the bill's co-sponsors. 

          Given that the counties affected by this legislation are also 
          the sponsors of the legislation, this legislation is arguably 
          unnecessary.  If those counties want to collect and post such 
          data, there is nothing in existing law that prevents them from 
          doing so.  However, the author's office believes that setting 
          statutory deadlines for publishing and posting the statistical 
          data will help the author to coordinate with the Senate Office 
          of Research and other groups to analyze and use the information.

          According to the author, widespread use of the Internet "has 
          changed how people interact with one another and how they share 
          private information. . . Evidence abounds that criminals use the 
          Internet to commit a host of illegal activities, from stealing 
          personal identifying information to starting and developing 
          inappropriate relationships with minors that lead to sex crimes. 
           Law enforcement and policymakers, however, have only limited 
          and sporadic information on this growing trend of 
          Internet-generated crimes."  The author believes that "without 
          solid, standard data on crimes involving the Internet, it is 
          impossible to accurately assess the extent of the problem and 
          what needs to be done about it."  


           Analysis Prepared by  :   Thomas Clark / JUD. / (916) 319-2334 









                                                                  SB 561
                                                                  Page  4



                                                                FN: 0004320