BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






          SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT    BILL NO:  SB 689
          Gloria Negrete McLeod, Chair   Hearing date:  May 2, 2011
          SB 689 (Harman)    as amended  4/26/11       FISCAL:  YES

           PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS:  ANNUAL REPORT ON RETIREES 
          RECEIVING AT LEAST $100,000 ANNUALLY IN RETIREMENT
           

           HISTORY  :

              Sponsor:  Author

              Prior legislation:  None

           
          SUMMARY  : 

          Would require the California Public Employees' Retirement 
          System (CalPERS), the California State Teachers' Retirement 
          System (CalSTRS), and the University of California (UC) to 
          establish and maintain a publicly accessible, and quarterly 
          updated website on the Internet pertaining to the costs of 
          pensions and postretirement healthcare benefits, on or before 
          July 1, 2012.


           BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS  : 
          
           1)Existing law  :

             a)   establishes the California Public Records Act (CPRA), 
               which provides that governmental records must be 
               disclosed to the public, upon request, unless there is a 
               specific reason not to do so, and a process by which the 
               public may request such documents, as specified;

             b)   requires state and local public retirement systems to 
               annually submit audited financial statements to the 
               State Controller within six months of the close of each 
               fiscal year;

             c)   requires state and local public retirement systems to 
               prepare annual financial reports in accordance with 
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 1 










               generally accepted accounting principles;

             d)   requires a state or local public retirement system 
               to, not less than triennially, secure the services of an 
               actuary enrolled under subtitle C of Title III of the 
               federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) 
               of 1974 to perform a valuation of the system using 
               actuarial assumptions and techniques, as specified;

             e)   requires the State Controller to review the audited 
               annual financial, and triennial valuation reports, as 
               specified, of each state and local public retirement 
               system submitted;

             f)   requires the State Controller to compile and publish 
               an annual report on the financial condition of all state 
               and local public retirement systems, as specified, and

             g)   as provided by the State Constitution, states in part 
               that the UC is a public trust to be administered by the 
               Regents of the UC with "full powers of organization and 
               government, subject only to legislative control as may 
               be necessary to insure the security of its funds and 
               compliance with the terms of the endowments of the 
               university and such competitive bidding procedures as 
               may be made applicable to the university by statute for 
               the letting of construction contracts, sales of real 
               property, and purchasing of materials, goods, and 
               services."  And that:

                    "The university shall be entirely independent of 
                    all political or sectarian influence and kept free 
                    therefrom in the appointment of its regents and in 
                    the administration of its affairs?."

           1)This bill would  :

             a)   require, on or before January 1, 2012, CalPERS, 
               CalSTRS and the UC to establish and maintain a publicly 
               accessible and quarterly updated website on the Internet 
               containing information regarding any retired member who 
               receives an annual pension of $100,000 or more, 
               including:
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 2 










                     the retired member's classification;
                     the department or agency from which the member 
                 retired;
                     the amount of the pension that the member 
                 receives annually, and

             a)   require the websites, as specified, by CalPERS, 
               CalSTRS and the UC to include information on 
               postretirement healthcare benefits for all retirees, 
               including:
                     the total cost of employer contributions paid for 
                 annuitants since the last update, and
                     the difference in dollars, and percentage between 
                 the total costs of employer contributions paid in the 
                 current and previous reporting period.

             a)   apply to the UC through express legislative findings 
               and declarations regarding the security of UC funds, 
               including retirement funds.


           FISCAL  :

          This bill has not yet been analyzed for fiscal impact, but 
          could result in increased administrative costs for CalPERS, 
          CalSTRS and the UC to develop, implement and maintain the 
          proposed public website, including costs for updating it on a 
          quarterly basis.


           COMMENTS  :

           1)Ambiguous Terminology - "Classification"

             This measure requires, among other things, that public 
            retirement systems report on the "classification" from 
            which the member retired.  It is unclear whether the 
            meaning of "classification" refers to the member's 
            retirement class, (e.g., safety, miscellaneous, etc.), or 
            whether the term refers to the member's job classification, 
            (e.g., city manager, janitor, bus driver, etc.)

            If the term "classification" is to mean the job position of 
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 3 










            the member before retirement, the data sought by this bill 
            could result in significant challenges for public 
            retirement systems.  Currently, employers do not 
            consistently report job classes that members held with 
            respect to the compensation earned, because job classes do 
            not affect the determination of a retirement benefit.  If a 
            public retirement system has to include that information in 
            the report, additional information may need to be collected 
            from the employer and stored by the public retirement 
            system, at significant additional expense to the employer 
            and the retirement system.

            For purposes of public retirement systems, the retirement 
            class is consistently monitored for the purposes of 
            determining benefits.
             
          2)Quantity of Impacted Earners in the California State 
            Teachers' Retirement (CalSTRS) and California Public 
            Employees' Retirement Systems (CalPERS)
           
            According to CalPERS, approximately 8,625 retired members 
            and beneficiaries received annual CalPERS payments of 
            $100,000 or more in 2009-10.  As of June 30, 2010, this 
            represented about 2% of retired CalPERS Defined Benefit 
            (DB) Program members and beneficiaries.

            According to CalSTRS, in 2010, about 4,800 members, 
            representing about 2.2% of retired Defined Benefit (DB) 
            Program members, received an annual benefit of $100,000 or 
            more from their own service.  An additional 400 members 
            received a total of $100,000 or more when their own 
            benefits were combined with the benefits they received by 
            virtue of being an option beneficiary or ex-spouse of a DB 
            Program member.

           3)Information Currently Available in Public Domain (Internet)  

            Pursuant to public records requests under the California 
            Public Records Act (CPRA), both the California Public 
            Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California 
            State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) have disclosed 
            the names, former employers and pension amounts of retirees 
            whose benefits exceeded $100,000 annually.
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 4 











            This information is currently available for free and 
            continuously updated on the internet by nonprofit 
            organizations obtained pursuant to the CPRA under titles 
            such as "The CalPERS $100,000 Pension Club" and "The 
            CalSTRS $100,000 Pension Club", etc.

           4)Ambiguous Terminology - Health Benefits Data  
             
            The language in the measure is unclear as to the 
            information to be provided by each system, as specified, on 
            postretirement healthcare benefits.  The language could be 
            interpreted to refer to reporting on the postretirement 
            healthcare benefits for individual retirees, or cumulative, 
            quantitative date on costs.

            Requiring CalPERS, CalSTRS and the UC to post specific 
            postretirement health care information on an Internet 
            website could pose a Health Insurance Portability and 
            Accountability Act (HIPAA) violation.  In addition, not all 
            of CalPERS' retiree health care is provided through 
            CalPERS.  In those instances, the System would not be able 
            to obtain this external data.

            Although some CalSTRS members receive retiree health care, 
            CalSTRS is not responsible for retiree health care and 
            would incur significant challenges in obtaining the 
            requested data.  In this regard, the language does not 
            specify whether retiree health benefits paid by the 
            retirement system are those sought for disclosure.

           5)Arguments in Support  

          According to the author:

               "No central place exists for the public to easily access 
               basic information about the rate of increase or decrease 
               of the cost of public pensions for each of the major 
               public retirement systems and to be able to track that 
               information on a timely basis.  Currently, the 
               Controller reports on public pensions only on an annual 
               basis.  The latest report was released December 29, 
               2010, was 400 pages long, and covered the fiscal year 
          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 5 










               2008-2009.  In no way can that be considered readily 
               accessible or timely information that can be readily 
               understood by the general public.  This legislation is 
               sensitive to the privacy needs of public retirees while 
               simultaneously promoting the public interests of 
               transparency and disclosure."

          According to the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA):

               "HJTA has filed a number of public records lawsuits over 
               the past year to compel local agencies to release this 
               information.  While all have thus far been successful, 
               this bill ensures that there will be a uniform statewide 
               standard for the collection and dispersal of this 
               important pension data."

           6)Arguments in Opposition  

          According to the California Retired Teachers Association 
          (CalRTA):

               "The information mandated to be provided by the 
               retirement systems already is available as public 
               information to individuals and legislative committees 
               who make the request," and notes that there is little 
               need to "create a new report for information that is 
               already available to the public at public expense."

          According to the American Federation of State, County and 
          Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO:
             
               "The Controller is required to compile and publish an 
               annual report on the financial condition of all state 
               and local public retirement systems.  This bill far 
               exceeds reasonable demands for disclosure concerning 
               retired public employees.  Having �a report] that 
               includes information about those few retirees who 
               receive a pension of more than $100,000 would unfairly 
               skew the public perception of the benefits received by 
               public employees.  This bill would only contribute to 
               the public's confusion and misunderstanding about public 
               employees and their pension benefits."

          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 6 












          7)   SUPPORT  :

            Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA)

          8)   OPPOSITION  :

            American Federation of State, County and Municipal 
            Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO
            California Correctional Supervisors Organization (CCSO)
            California Retired Teachers Association (CalRTA)



          
                                      #####
























          Michael Bolden
          Date:  4/26/11                                         Page 7