BILL ANALYSIS Ó SB 695 Page 1 Date of Hearing: July 6, 2011 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair SB 695 (Hancock) - As Amended: May 23, 2011 Policy Committee: HealthVote:19-0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: No Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill authorizes counties to access federal Medi-Cal reimbursement for health services provided to youth awaiting adjudication in county juvenile detention facilities, subject to state actions and declarations, as specified. Specifically, this bill: 1)Requires both of the following conditions to be met in order to receive federal funding: a) The youth must be Medi-Cal eligible. b) The county must agree to pay the non-federal share of Medi-Cal costs and the state's administrative costs, including costs associated with development of regulations. 2)Requires the Medi-Cal benefits provided pursuant to this bill to continue until adjudication. 3)Requires the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to seek federal approval to allow for federal financial participation (FFP), and provides that the bill is only operative if both of the following occur: a) The DHCS receives written confirmation from the federal government that FFP is available. b) The director of DHCS executes a declaration that implementation of this bill will not jeopardize federal funding to the state Medi-Cal program. FISCAL EFFECT SB 695 Page 2 1)Annual increased Medi-Cal costs, likely in the millions of dollars (50% federal/50% local) to the extent counties opt into the funding mechanism established by this bill and provide Medi-Cal health services to youth awaiting adjudication. 2)Unknown one-time administrative workload to DHCS to seek federal approval, not likely to exceed $100,000. Although this bill requires counties to pay the state share of cost for state administrative workload, it unclear whether the initial workload necessary to receive federal approval will be reimbursed by counties. 3)Unknown ongoing costs (50% federal/50% local) to DHCS to administer the funding mechanism established by this bill, and to county welfare departments to verify the Medi-Cal eligibility status of youth awaiting adjudication and process new applications. This bill requires counties to pay the state share of cost for administrative workload. Actual costs would depend on how many counties opt in to the program and how many youth are found Medi-Cal eligible. COMMENTS 1)Rationale . This bill is sponsored by Alameda County to establish a funding mechanism to provide relief to counties for providing health services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries at 100% county cost. This bill increases federal funding and reduces county funding spent providing primary care and mental health services to youth awaiting adjudication in juvenile hall. According to the author and sponsor, this bill is based on a program established in New Mexico in 2000 that allows receipt of federal funding for health services for juveniles in temporary custody. Representatives of Alameda County indicate that the majority of the medical services provided to youth in the juvenile justice system are provided while they are awaiting adjudication, because most youth are not actually incarcerated. 2)Background . Current federal regulations specify that federal financial participation is not available for services provided to inmates of public institutions, with limited exceptions. However, direction from the federal government also encourages suspending, rather than terminating, Medicaid benefits. SB SB 695 Page 3 1147 (Calderon), Chapter 546, Statutes of 2008 codified this directive from the federal government and prohibits DHCS from terminating the Medi-Cal eligibility of an incarcerated youth. However, this bill did not address youth awaiting adjudication. 3)Definition of Inmate . According to federal regulations, an individual is not considered an inmate if "he/she is in a public institution for a temporary period pending other arrangements appropriate to his/her needs." This definition has reportedly allowed other states to claim federal reimbursement for youth awaiting adjudication. 4)Related Case Law . A lawsuit brought by San Francisco and Santa Clara in 2007 challenged California's practice of denying Medi-Cal coverage of inpatient psychiatric hospital services provided to youth who are in custody. In April 2010 the San Francisco Superior Court ruled these denials violate federal and state law and ordered the state to provide Medi-Cal coverage of inpatient psychiatric hospital services for individuals under age 21, regardless of their status as detainees. The state appealed this ruling, but subsequently withdrew the appeal in May 2011. This bill includes language to preserve that ruling. 5)Related Legislation . a) SB 1091 (Hancock) was substantially similar to this bill and was vetoed. The veto message cited inconsistency with federal law and potentially significant state costs. SB 695, as drafted, appears to be consistent with federal law and does not appear to expose the state to significant costs. b) AB 396 (Mitchell) requires DHCS to develop a process to allow participating counties and the state Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to receive any available federal financial participation for health care services provided to juvenile detainees who are admitted as inpatients in a medical institution. AB 396 is pending in the Senate Public Safety committee. c) AB 1628 (Budget Committee), Chapter 729, Statutes of 2010 (the 2010 corrections trailer bill) authorized state departments to seek Medi-Cal reimbursement for the SB 695 Page 4 provision of inpatient hospital services to adult inmates who would otherwise be eligible for Medi-Cal or similar county-based low-income health programs (LIHP), but for their institutional status as inmates. d) SB 1147 (Calderon), Chapter 546, Statutes of 2008 provides that Medi-Cal eligibility of a minor is suspended, not terminated, while the minor is incarcerated. Analysis Prepared by : Lisa Murawski / APPR. / (916) 319-2081