BILL ANALYSIS Ó SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Senator Carol Liu, Chair BILL NO: SB 718 S AUTHOR: Vargas B VERSION: March 29, 2011 HEARING DATE: April 26, 2011 7 FISCAL: Appropriations 1 8 CONSULTANT: Park SUBJECT Elder abuse: mandated reporting SUMMARY Allows mandated reporters of elder and dependent adult abuse to make reports through the Internet, as specified. ABSTRACT Existing law: 1.Under the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (EADACPA), requires any mandated reporter Ýdefined as any person who has assumed the care or custody of an elder or dependent adult (compensated or not), including administrators, supervisors, or licensed staff of a public or private facility that provides care to elder or dependent adults, elder or dependent adult care custodian, health practitioner, clergy member, employee of county adult protective services, or a local law enforcement agency] who, within the scope of his or her employment or professional capacity, observes or has knowledge of physical abuse, abandonment, abduction, isolation, financial abuse, or neglect, or is told by an Continued--- STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 2 elder or dependent adult, as defined, that he or she has experienced abuse above, or reasonably suspects abuse, to report the known or suspected abuse by telephone immediately, or as soon as practicably possible, and by written report sent within two working days, to appropriate parties, as specified below. a. For abuse that has occurred in a long-term care facility, except a state developmental center or state mental health hospital, requires the mandated reporter to make a report to the local ombudsperson or the local law enforcement agency. b. For suspected or alleged abuse occurring in a state mental hospital or state developmental center, requires the report to be made to the Department of Mental Health or the Department of Developmental Services, or to the local law enforcement agency. c. For abuse that occurs any place other than what is described above, requires the report to be made to the adult protective services agency or the local law enforcement agency. 1.Requires the local ombudsperson or the local law enforcement agency to, as soon as practicable, except immediately in the case of an emergency, report known or suspected abuse, as specified. 2.Provides that when two or more mandated reporters are present and have knowledge or reasonably suspect types of abuse, and are agreed, a Ýsingle] telephone report may be made and a single Ýwritten] report may be made. 3.Separately, requires any mandated reporter of suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult, defined as all officers and employees of financial institutions, under prescribed circumstances, to report known or suspected instance of financial abuse by telephone immediately, or as soon as practicably possible, and by written report sent within two working days to the local adult protective services agency or local law enforcement agency. If the mandated reporter knows that the elder or dependent adult resides in a long-term care facility, as defined, requires the report to be made to the local ombudsman or local law enforcement agency. Allows joint reports to be made, similar to 3) above. STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 3 Sunsets these particular provisions on January 1, 2013. 4.Requires a telephone report to include the name of the person making the report, the name and age of the elder or dependent adult, the present location of the elder or dependent adult, the names and addresses of family members or any other adult responsible for the elder or dependent adult's care, the nature and extent of the elder or dependent adult's condition, the date of the incident, and any other information including information that led the person to suspect abuse, as requested by the agency receiving the report. 5.Requires written abuse reports to be submitted on forms adopted by DSS, and requires county adult protective services agencies and long-term care ombudsman programs to distribute these forms, and allows the reporting form to also be used for documenting telephone reports by the county adult protective services agency, local ombudsman program, and local law enforcement agencies. 6.Requires the form to contain the following items: the name, address, telephone number, and occupation of the reporting person; the name and address of the victim; the date, time, and place of the incident; other details, including the reporter's observations and beliefs concerning the incident; any statement relating to the incident made by the victim; the name of any individuals believed to have knowledge of the incident; the name of the individuals believed to be responsible for the incident and their connection to the victim. 7.Requires county adult protective services agencies and long-term care ombudsman programs to make specified reports on the written abuse reports it receives. This bill: 1.Allows mandated reporters to report known or suspected abuse by Internet, in addition to telephone as current law allows, and requires an Internet report to contain the same information elements as a telephone report. 2.Allows a written abuse report that is currently required as a follow-up to the telephone report to be submitted STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 4 through a confidential Internet reporting tool, if the county or long-term care ombudsman program chooses to implement such a system. Requires the confidential Internet reporting tool to contain the same information elements as the written abuse report. 3.Makes related and other technical changes. FISCAL IMPACT Unknown. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Author's statement The author states that the County of San Diego, adult protective services agency, currently receives reports of suspected abuse from mandated reporters and from members of the community on the same phone line, and, due to the high volume of callers, there can be a lengthy wait before a call is answered. The author states that there is some concern that, due to the long wait, members of the community who are not required to report, may hang up and not report the abuse, which could leave seniors and dependent adults at further risk of abuse. The author further notes that, in fiscal year 2008-09, the state reduced local assistance funding for the adult protective services program by $11.4 million statewide, representing a 10 percent reduction to the program, which had not received an increase related to the cost of doing business since 2001. The author points out that, because San Diego County reduced its staff who answer such calls by four positions, wait times have increased and the percent of calls that are abandoned has also increased. The author provides statistics that show that the Department of Aging and Independent Services (AIS) at the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency has experienced a significant increase in the total number of calls, the number of abandoned calls, and the average "abandoned time." Related legislation SB 33 (Simitian) of 2011 deletes the January 1, 2013, STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 5 sunset date on the Elder and Dependent Adult Financial Abuse Reporting Act, originally enacted in 2005. Pending action on the Senate Floor. AB 40 (Yamada) of 2011 requires mandated reporters of elder or dependent adult abuse and financial abuse to report suspected or known instances of elder or dependent adult abuse, which is believed to have occurred in a long-term care facility, to both the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and local law enforcement (rather than one or the other as current law requires). Set to be heard in Assembly Public Safety on May 3, 2011. AB 367 (Smyth) of 2011 allows mandated and non-mandated reporters of elder and dependent adult abuse to report suspected elder and dependent adult abuse occurring within a community to any adult protective services agency or law enforcement agency, regardless of whether the agency lacks geographical or subject matter jurisdiction or obligation to receive the report. Pending hearing in the Assembly Committee on Aging and Long-Term Care. AB 518 (Wagner) of 2011 is nearly identical to SB 33 (Simitian). Set to be heard in Assembly Public Safety on April 26, 2011. Arguments in support The County of San Diego, the sponsor of this measure, believes that, by allowing mandated reporters the option to file reports of suspected abuse through a secure electronic Web referral system, the number of telephone reporters could be reduced by half, thus reducing wait times for phone reporting and the number of abandoned calls. The county notes that the number of callers that hung up while waiting to report abuse has grown by 50 percent since fiscal year 2007-08. The San Diego County District Attorney writes that San Diego County handles approximately 9,000 cases of elder and dependent adult abuse each year, and that confidential Internet reporting would give mandated reporters an additional tool for curtailing abuse of elders and dependent adults. The San Diego County Sheriff's Department states that, due to state cuts, deputies are forced to spend valuable staff time waiting on hold to report abuse, and such a tool would allow deputies to STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 6 fulfill their duties as mandated reporters, while allowing them to devote their time to other crucial aspects of public safety. The California State Association of Counties writes that this measure would help counties ensure the safety and financial security of elder Californians and make it easier for mandated reporters to submit a report of suspected abuse. QUESTIONS & COMMENTS 1. Recommended amendments. a. In order to clarify that the Internet reporting mechanism is strictly tied to the confidential Internet reporting tool, staff recommends the following amendments. Page 2, lines 17-20: 7 (b) (1) Any mandated reporter who, in his or her professional 8 capacity, or within the scope of his or her employment, has 9 observed or has knowledge of an incident that reasonably appears 10 to be physical abuse, as defined in Section 15610.63 of the Welfare 11 and Institutions Code, abandonment, abduction, isolation, financial 12 abuse, or neglect, or is told by an elder or dependent adult that he 13 or she has experienced behavior, including an act or omission, 14 constituting physical abuse, as defined in Section 15610.63 of the 15 Welfare and Institutions Code, abandonment, abduction, isolation, 16 financial abuse, or neglect, or reasonably suspects that abuse, shall 17 report the known or suspected instance of abuse by telephone or through a confidential 18 Internet reporting tool, authorized pursuant to Section 15658, immediately or as soon as practicably STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 7 possible ., and, ifIf 19 reported by telephone, a written report must be sent or an Internet report, made through the confidential Internet reporting tool authorized pursuant to Section 15658, must be submittedby written report or by Internet report sent20 within two working days, as follows: 21 (A) If the abuse has occurred in a long-term care facility, except 22 a state mental health hospital or a state developmental center, the 23 report shall be made to the local ombudsperson or the local law 24 enforcement agency. Ý?] Page 5-6, lines 38-17: 38 (d) When two or more mandated reporters are present and jointly 39 have knowledge or reasonably suspect that types of abuse of an 40 elder or a dependent adult for which a report is or is not mandated 1 have occurred, and when there is agreement among them, the 2 telephone report or Internet report , as authorized pursuant to Section 15658, may be made by a member of the team 3 selected by mutual agreement, and a single report may be made 4 and signed by the selected member of the reporting team. Any 5 member who has knowledge that the member designated to report 6 has failed to do so shall thereafter make the report. 7 (e) A telephone or Internet report , authorized pursuant to Section 15658, of a known or suspected 8 instance of elder or dependent adult abuse shall include, if known, 9 the name of the person making the report, the name and age of the 10 elder or dependent adult, the present location of the elder or 11 dependent adult, the names and addresses of STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 8 family members or 12 any other adult responsible for the elder's or dependent adult's 13 care, the nature and extent of the elder's or dependent adult's 14 condition, the date of the incident, and any other information, 15 including information that led that person to suspect elder or 16 dependent adult abuse, as requested by the agency receiving the 17 report. Page 8, lines 3-31: 3 (d) (1) Any mandated reporter of suspected financial abuse of 4 an elder or dependent adult who has direct contact with the elder 5 or dependent adult or who reviews or approves the elder or 6 dependent adult's financial documents, records, or transactions, 7 in connection with providing financial services with respect to an 8 elder or dependent adult, and who, within the scope of his or her 9 employment or professional practice, has observed or has 10 knowledge of an incident, that is directly related to the transaction 11 or matter that is within that scope of employment or professional 12 practice, that reasonably appears to be financial abuse, or who 13 reasonably suspects that abuse, based solely on the information 14 before him or her at the time of reviewing or approving the 15 document, record, or transaction in the case of mandated reporters 16 who do not have direct contact with the elder or dependent adult, 17 shall report the known or suspected instance of financial abuse by 18 telephone or through a confidential Internet STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 9 reporting tool, authorized pursuant to Section 15658, immediately, or as soon as practicably 19 possible ., and, ifIf reported by telephone, a written report must be sent or an Internet report, made through the confidential Internet reporting tool authorized pursuant to Section 15658, must be submittedby written report or by 20 Internet report sentwithin two working days to the local adult 21 protective services agency or the local law enforcement agency. 22 (2) When two or more mandated reporters jointly have 23 knowledge or reasonably suspect that financial abuse of an elder 24 or a dependent adult for which the report is mandated has occurred, 25 and when there is an agreement among them, the telephone report or 26 Internet report , as authorized pursuant to Section 15658, may be made by a member of the reporting team 27 who is selected by mutual agreement. A single report may be made 28 and signed by the selected member of the reporting team. Any 29 member of the team who has knowledge that the member 30 designated to report has failed to do so shall thereafter make that 31 report. a. In order to ensure that the confidential Internet reporting tool meets all the requirements for confidentiality and privacy that apply to non-Internet reporting, and in order to better understand whether there are any deterrents or risks in using such a tool, staff recommends the amendments below: Page 10, lines 23-25: 23 (2) Through a confidential Internet reporting tool, if the county 24 or long-term care ombudsman program chooses to implement such 25 a system. STAFF ANALYSIS OF SENATE BILL 718 (Vargas) Page 10 (a) A county or long-term care ombudsman program that chooses to implement such a system shall report to the policy committees of the Senate and the Assembly one year after full implementation the changes in the number of mandated reporters reporting through a confidential Internet reporting tool, changes in the number of abandoned calls, and any other quantitative or qualitative data that indicates the success, or lack thereof, in employing a confidential Internet reporting tool to better protect the safety and financial security of elder and dependent adults. (b) Information sent and received through the confidential Internet reporting tool shall be used only for its intended purpose and subject to the same confidentiality and privacy requirements that govern non-electronic transmission of the same information. POSITIONS Support: County of San Diego (sponsor) AARP Alzheimer's Association California District Attorneys Association California State Association of Counties California State Sheriffs' Association City of Carlsbad Police Department, Investigations Division San Diego County Sheriff's Department San Diego County District Attorney 3 individuals Oppose:None received -- END --