BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 804|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 804
          Author:   Corbett (D)
          Amended:  1/4/12
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE  :  6-3, 1/11/12
          AYES:  Wolk, DeSaulnier, Hancock, Hernandez, Kehoe, Liu
          NOES:  Huff, Fuller, La Malfa

           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  5-1, 1/11/12
          AYES:  Hernandez, Alquist, De León, DeSaulnier, Wolk
          NOES:  Blakeslee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Strickland, Anderson, Rubio


           SUBJECT  :    Health care districts:  transfers of assets

           SOURCE :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires health care districts to 
          include, in an agreement transferring more than 50 percent 
          of the health care districts assets, the appraised fair 
          market value of any asset transferred to a nonprofit 
          corporation, as defined.  Further requires the appraisal of 
          the fair market value to be performed within the six months 
          preceding the date on which the district approves the 
          transfer agreement.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 804
                                                                Page 
          2


          1. Establishes the Local Health Care District Law which 
             authorizes 
             communities to form special districts to construct and 
             operate hospitals and other health care facilities to 
             meet local needs.

          2. Authorizes a health care district to transfer, for the 
             benefit of the communities served by the district, any 
             part of its assets of the district to one or more 
             nonprofit corporations to operate and maintain the 
             assets.  Prior to the district transfer, requires the 
             district board to submit a measure to the voters of the 
             district proposing the transfer.

          3. Authorizes a district to transfer, at less than fair 
             market value, any part of the assets of the district to 
             one or more nonprofit corporations to operate and 
             maintain the assets, if the transfer benefits the 
             communities served by the district.  Requires that for a 
             transfer of 50 percent or more of a district's assets to 
             be deemed to benefit a district's communities, a 
             district must:

             A.    Fully discuss the transfer agreement in at least 
                five properly noticed public meetings before the 
                district board's decision to transfer the assets;

             B.    Provide, in the transfer agreement, that the 
                district approve all initial board members of the 
                nonprofit corporation and any subsequent board 
                members as may be specified in the transfer 
                agreement;

             C.    Provide, in the transfer agreement, that specified 
                assets are to be transferred back to the district 
                upon termination of the transfer agreement;

             D.    Commit the nonprofit corporation, in the transfer 
                agreement, to operate and maintain the district's 
                health care facilities and its assets for the benefit 
                of the communities served by the district; and

             E.    Require, in the transfer agreement, that any funds 







                                                                SB 804
                                                                Page 
          3

                a corporation receives from the district be used only 
                for specified activities that would further a valid 
                public purpose if undertaken directly by the 
                district.

          4. Requires the district to report to the California 
             Attorney General, within 30 days of any lease of 
             district assets to one or more corporations, the type of 
             transaction and the entity to whom the assets were 
             leased.

          This bill:

          1. Requires health care districts to include, in an 
             agreement transferring more than 50 percent of the 
             health care district's assets, the appraised fair market 
             value of any asset transferred to the nonprofit 
             corporation.

          2. Requires the fair market value be appraised by an 
             independent consultant with expertise in methods of 
             appraisal and valuation and in accordance with 
             applicable governmental and industry standards for 
             appraisal and valuation of any asset transfer.

          3. Requires that the appraisal be performed within the six 
             months preceding the date on which the district approves 
             the transfer agreement.

           Background

           Health care districts were formed under state law to meet 
          local health needs not satisfied by other health care 
          resources or government programs in a given geographical 
          area.  Districts formed pursuant to state law are financed 
          by assessments on real and personal property within the 
          district.  A 2006 report published by the California 
          Healthcare Foundation found that 85 health care and 
          hospital districts have been formed in California since the 
          first hospital district enabling legislation was passed in 
          1946.  Districts operate medical facilities, including 
          hospitals, public health clinics, and skilled nursing 
          facilities.  Some also provide community-based education 
          programs to the residents of their districts.  Responding 







                                                                SB 804
                                                                Page 
          4

          to changes in health care delivery, districts explore 
          economic and organizational alternatives, including leasing 
          or selling their assets to nonprofit corporations or even 
          to for-profit companies.  

          Comments  

          According to the author's office, "SB 804 will help ensure 
          that the public has the information they need to decide 
          about the transfer of health care district's assets to an 
          outside entity for less than fair market value.  Under 
          current law, a transfer of 50 percent or more of a 
          healthcare district's assets requires voter approval, but 
          there is no requirement to provide voters with an 
          independently verified valuation of the assets in question. 
           SB 804 remedies this problem, by requiring an independent 
          appraisal of the fair market value of the health care 
          district's assets and ensuring that information is provided 
          to the public."

           Prior Legislation

           SB 134 (Corbett), 2011-12 Session, contained provisions 
          substantially similar to the provisions of this bill.  SB 
          134 was amended to delete these provisions in the Assembly.

          SB 1240 (Corbett), 2009-10 Session, would have imposed 
          conditions on contracts between districts and other 
          entities to operate one or more health facilities owned by 
          the district.  The bill was vetoed by Governor Arnold 
          Schwarzenegger, who stated that the bill would have limited 
          the discretion of a district when entering into a contract 
          with another operating entity and would have created the 
          unintended consequence of reducing the incentive for such 
          arrangements when hospitals are struggling to remain open.

          SB 894 (Corbett), Chapter 699, Statutes of 2010, made 
          permanent the requirement that health care districts get 
          majority-voter approval before they transfer or lease 50 
          percent or more of their assets to corporations.

          SB 1351 (Corbett), 2007-08 Session, would have required 
          voter approval before a district can transfer, for the 
          benefit of the communities served by the district and in 







                                                                SB 804
                                                                Page 
          5

          the absence of adequate consideration, any part of the 
          assets of the district to one or more nonprofit 
          corporations to operate and maintain the assets, as opposed 
          to 50 percent or more of the district's assets.  The bill 
          was vetoed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

          AB 1131 (Torrico), Chapter 194, Statutes of 2005, extended 
          the January 1, 2006 sunset date to 2011, permitting 
          districts to transfer or lease assets to for-profit 
          corporations, as specified.
          
           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No   
          Local:  No


          AGB:mw  1/13/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****