BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 829
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 28, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                    SB 829 (Rubio) - As Amended:  March 14, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              Business and 
          Professions  Vote:                            6-2

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill:

          1)Stipulates that state funding or financial assistance shall 
            not be used to support any construction projects of a charter 
            city if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance in that 
            city prohibits the governing board from considering use of a 
            project labor agreement (PLA) meeting specified statutory 
            requirements.

          2)Stipulates that (1) shall not be applicable until January 1, 
            2015 for cities where a charter provision, initiative, or 
            ordinance in effect prior to November 1, 2011 would disqualify 
            a city project from receiving state funding.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          The bill could result in a reallocation of state infrastructure 
          funding, such as annual transportation funding for local streets 
          and roads, to the extent a charter city has an ordinance banning 
          PLAs in general and thus is no longer eligible for state funding 
          after January 1, 2015. 

          Charter cities that ban PLAs, in order to remain eligible for 
          state funding after January 1, 2015, could incur costs to amend 
          their charters to overturn such bans. For PLA bans adopted by 
          ordinance, these costs would be minor. For PLA bans adopted by 
          charter amendment or initiative, a city seeking to overturn the 
          ban would incur the one-time costs of submitting the proposal to 
          the voters for approval. These costs would not be state 
          reimbursable.








                                                                  SB 829
                                                                  Page  2


           COMMENTS  

           1)Background . A PLA is a pre-hire agreement establishing the 
            terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction 
            project. PLAs are completed before any workers are hired, to 
            establish the wage rates and benefits of all employees working 
            on the project and to prevent strikes, lockouts, or other work 
            stoppages for the length of the project.  The terms of the 
            agreement apply to all contractors and subcontractors, whether 
            union or non-union, who successfully bid on the project, and 
            supersede any existing collective bargaining agreements.

            SB 922 (Steinberg)/Chapter 431 of 2011, required a PLA on a 
            public works project of any state or local government entity 
            to incorporate specified provisions. With respect to charter 
            cities, SB 922 also stipulated that, effective January 1, 
            2015, a charter city that has banned a PLA on a project could 
            not receive state funding for that project. (A charter city 
            has the power to regulate "municipal affairs," while a general 
            law city is subject to the general laws passed by the 
            Legislature.)

           2)Purpose  . This bill, sponsored by the State Building and 
            Construction Trades Council, extends the provisions of SB 922 
            to prohibit charter cities that ban PLAs from receiving state 
            funding for any city project. As with SB 922, the author and 
            sponsor indicate that SB 829 is needed because "anti-union 
            groups/associations continue their campaign to eliminate the 
            option for local governments to utilize PLAs." The bill is 
            supported by numerous labor and specialty contractor 
            organizations.

           3)Opposition  .  The Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) 
            identifies several legal issues regarding SB 829, arguing in 
            part that the bill interferes with the Constitutional rights 
            of charter cities "to control their own local affairs except 
            in matters of statewide concern." The bill is also opposed by 
            the California Chamber of Commerce.

           4)PLA Prohibitions in Charter Cities  . The City of Oceanside 
            adopted a general PLA prohibition by charter amendment, and 
            the City of Fresno did likewise through an ordinance. The City 
            of Chula Vista's ordinance, enacted by the voters, limits the 
            city's ability to impose certain provisions in PLAs, and 








                                                                  SB 829
                                                                  Page  3

            distinguishes between the types of applicable projects based 
            on their funding source. The City of San Diego has a proposed 
            initiative for the June 2012 ballot that prohibits the city 
            from imposing PLAs on certain projects, but allows the city to 
            consider a PLA on a project as a condition of receiving state 
            funding.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081