BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 859|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 859
          Author:   Padilla (D), et al.
          Amended:  8/23/11
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  6-1, 4/12/11
          AYES:  Hancock, Anderson, Calderon, Liu, Price, Steinberg
          NOES:  Harman

           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  4-0, 5/3/11
          AYES:  Evans, Harman, Blakeslee, Leno
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Corbett

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  8-0, 5/26/11
          AYES:  Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Lieu, Pavley, Price, 
            Runner, Steinberg
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Emmerson

           SENATE FLOOR  :  35-3, 6/2/11
          AYES:  Alquist, Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Calderon, 
            Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Dutton, 
            Emmerson, Evans, Hancock, Harman, Hernandez, Huff, Kehoe, 
            La Malfa, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Lowenthal, Padilla, Pavley, 
            Price, Rubio, Steinberg, Strickland, Vargas, Walters, 
            Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NOES:  Fuller, Gaines, Negrete McLeod
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner, Simitian

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  58-21, 8/31/11 - See last page for vote


            SUBJECT  :    Department of Motor Vehicles:  confidentiality 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 859
                                                                Page 
          2

                      of home address information

           SOURCE  :     California Electric Transportation Coalition 


           DIGEST  :    This bill allows confidential home address 
          information in Department of Motor Vehicles records to be 
          disclosed to an electrical corporation or public utility if 
          the utility or its agent, under penalty of perjury, 
          requests and uses the information only for the purpose of 
          identifying where an electric vehicle is registered.

           Assembly Amendments  make technical and clarifying changes, 
          and add a coauthor.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, the California Constitution, 
          provides that all people have inalienable rights, including 
          the right to pursue and obtain privacy.  (California 
          Constitution, Article I, Section 1)

          Existing law provides that any residence address in 
          Department of Motor Vehicles' (DMV) records is confidential 
          and shall not be disclosed to any person except a court, 
          law enforcement or other government agency, or as specified 
          in Vehicle Code Sections 1808.22 and 1808.23.   (Vehicle 
          Code Section 1808.21)

          Existing law provides that residential addresses may be 
          disclosed to a vehicle manufacturer if the manufacturer or 
          its agent, under penalty of perjury, requests and uses the 
          information only for the purpose of safety, warranty, 
          emission, or product recall if the manufacturer offers to 
          make and makes any changes at no cost to the vehicle owner. 
           (Vehicle Code Section 1808.23(a))

          Existing law provides that any residential addresses 
          released by DMV may not be used for direct marketing or 
          solicitation for the purchase of any consumer product or 
          service.  (Vehicle Code Section 1808.23(d))

          Existing law requires any person who has access to 
          confidential or restricted DMV information to establish 
          procedures to protect the confidentiality of those records. 
           Existing law specifies that if any confidential or 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 859
                                                                Page 
          3

          restricted information is released to any agent of a person 
          authorized to obtain information, the person shall require 
          the agent to take all steps necessary to ensure 
          confidentiality and prevent the release of any information 
          to a third party.  No agent shall obtain or use any 
          confidential or restricted records for any purpose other 
          than the reason the information was requested.  (Vehicle 
          Code Section 1808.47)
          This bill allows DMV to disclose confidential home address 
          information to an electrical corporation or public utility 
          if the corporation or utility or its agent, under penalty 
          of perjury, requests and uses the information only for the 
          purposes of identifying where an electric vehicle is 
          registered.  All of the following shall apply to this bill:

           DMV may disclose to the electrical corporation or local 
            publicly owned utility only the type of vehicle and 
            address of the electric vehicle owner.  DMV shall not 
            disclose the name of the electric vehicle owner.

           Within 15 days of receiving residence address information 
            from DMV pursuant to this section, an electrical 
            corporation or local publicly owned utility shall provide 
            a clear, express disclosure to the electric vehicle owner 
            that his/her residence address information is permitted 
            by law to be shared with the corporation or utility.  The 
            disclosure shall not contain marketing information or a 
            solicitation for the purchase of goods or services.

           Confidential home address and type of vehicle information 
            of electric vehicle owners disclosed pursuant to this 
            bill shall only be used for the purpose of identifying 
            where an electric vehicle is registered and shall not be 
            used or disclosed for any other purpose, including for 
            purposes of identifying the individual(s) residing at the 
            address, or to any other person.

           The electrical corporation or local publicly owned 
            utility and its agents shall not sell, share, or further 
            disclose, including to any subsidiaries, residence 
            address or type of vehicle information of electric 
            vehicle owners obtained pursuant to this bill, or name 
            information determined by matching residence information 
            against the corporation or utility's customer records.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 859
                                                                Page 
          4


           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

             Major Provisions                2011-12     2012-13    
             2013-14               Fund  

            DMV disclosures               over $150           over 
            $300                over $300           Special*

            * Motor Vehicle Account
           
           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/31/11)

          California Electric Transportation Coalition (source)
          California Municipal Utilities Association
          Environmental Defense Fund
          National Resources Defense Council
          Pacific Gas and Electric Company
          Sacramento Municipal Utility District
          San Diego Gas and Electric Company
          Southern California Edison

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author writes: 

            "Over the next ten years at least 1 million PEVs are 
            expected to hit the road in California. As PEVs enter 
            California markets, utilities, municipal governments, PEV 
            charging service providers, and other organizations are 
            working together on infrastructure rollouts to support 
            charging at homes and in public, and to ensure that PEV 
            charging integrates smoothly into the electricity grid.

            "? the deployment of PEVs will place new demands on the 
            state's electric system, but managed properly, that 
            demand can benefit ratepayers and car owners alike.  If 
            that service is not managed efficiently, it will cost all 
            ratepayers in the form of higher electric rates and 
            diminish the environmental benefits of PEVs by increasing 
            greenhouse gas and other emissions associated with the 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 859
                                                                Page 
          5

            generation of electricity.  However, a well-planned 
            electric vehicle charging infrastructure can ensure that 
            the distribution grid has the capacity necessary to 
            handle the charging of the vehicles and can also shift a 
            significant amount of charging to off-peak times.  The 
            result is that the need for the new building of new power 
            plants is minimized and the utilization of existing 
            plants is increased."

          The bill's sponsor, California Electric Transportation 
          Coalition (CalETC), writes that the bill would allow "DMV 
          to provide needed information to utilities for the sole 
          purpose of maintaining grid safety, reliability and 
          efficiency.  The utilities would not be allowed to use the 
          DMV information for any marketing purposes but would have 
          access to essential information that will help to ensure 
          that localized transformer impacts associated with plug-in 
          electric vehicles are addressed prior to adverse 
          consequences, including potential localized outages due to 
          electricity demand increases.  The DMV data is particularly 
          useful as this data is the single most reliable in terms of 
          tracking plug-in electric vehicle sale and resale.  Any and 
          all costs associated with collecting the data will be borne 
          by utilities; these costs are anticipated to be minimal."  

          The sponsor indicates that several electric vehicle 
          manufacturers have entered into a memorandum of 
          understanding with utilities to provide the utilities with 
          the home address information of purchasers of new electric 
          vehicles.  Consumers may opt-out of the sharing of this 
          information.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  58-21, 8/31/11
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, 
            Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, 
            Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, 
            Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, 
            Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, 
            Gordon, Hagman, Hall, Hayashi, Roger Hernández, Hill, 
            Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, 
            Mendoza, Mitchell, Monning, Nestande, Pan, Perea, V. 
            Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, 
            Torres, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 859
                                                                Page 
          6

            Pérez
          NOES:  Conway, Cook, Donnelly, Garrick, Gatto, Grove, 
            Halderman, Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, 
            Mansoor, Miller, Morrell, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, 
            Smyth, Valadao
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Gorell


          RJG:mw  8/31/11   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
          































                                                           CONTINUED