BILL ANALYSIS Ó
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
SB 1000 (Yee) - Public Utilities Commission: records.
Amended: April 18, 2012 Policy Vote: EU&C 7-4, JUD 4-1
Urgency: No Mandate: No
Hearing Date: May 14, 2012 Consultant: Marie Liu
This bill does not meet the criteria for referral to the
Suspense File.
Bill Summary: SB 1000 would require the California Public
Utilities Commission (PUC) to make investigation orders,
recommendations, and accident reports publicly available under
the California Public Records Act and would delete the
misdemeanor penalty for a PUC officer or employee who divulges
confidential public utility information.
Fiscal Impact: Possible one-time costs of $75,000 from the
Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account
(special fund) in FY 2013-14 to conduct a proceeding to update
the PUC's Rules of Practice and Procedure.
Background: Unlike other state agencies, whose records are
generally open for public inspection under the California Public
Records Act, the PUC operates under a statute that affords the
public access to its records only when specifically permitted by
the PUC. This statute creates a presumption against public
inspection and has been largely unchanged despite past open
government reforms that affected other agencies.
Public Utilities Code §583 states that any present or former
employee of the PUC who divulges any confidential public utility
information provided to the PUC is guilty of a misdemeanor.
Proposed Law: This bill would delete PUC-specific public
disclosure requirements and instead would require that
investigation orders, recommendations, and accident reports be
available to the public under the California Public Records Act.
This bill would also no longer make it a misdemeanor for a PUC
employee to divulge confidential public utility information.
Related Legislation: AB 1541 (Dickinson) would expand public
> (>)
Page 1
access to accident investigation orders or recommendations.
Staff Comments: According to the PUC, much of the work required
by this bill can be done through resolution, which would have
minimal costs to the PUC. Staff notes that consideration of
increased public disclosure of PUC reports through a resolution
is currently underway at the PUC.
There is some uncertainty on whether the bill would require the
PUC to update their Rules of Practice and Procedures, which can
only be done through a proceeding. If this update would be
required, the PUC estimates it would need to conduct a
relatively simple proceeding for an approximate one-time cost of
$75,000.