BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 987
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 8, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 987 (Negrete McLeod) - As Amended: June 11, 2012
Policy Committee: PERSS Vote:4-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill, as proposed to be amended, would make various
technical and non-controversial changes to various sections of
the Government Code administered by the California Public
Employees' Retirement Board, including code sections governing
the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS),
the Judges' Retirement Systems I and II (JRS I and JRS II) and
the Legislators' Retirement System (LRS).
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible fiscal impact.
COMMENTS
1)Background. Annually, CalPERS sponsors a housekeeping bill to
make technical and non-controversial changes to the area of
law it administers. This bill includes the following
provisions:
a) Standardizes service credit purchase eligibility for
temporary disability leaves. Existing law allows members
on an employer-approved leave for medical reasons, to
purchase retirement service credit for their time away from
active service, but contains confusing references. SB 987
clarifies that members are able to purchase service credit
at their own expense for time away from work caused by a
non-work related injury in the same manner as purchasing
service credit for leave a non-work related illness.
b) Clarifies that references to "spouse," "surviving
spouse," and "marriage" in the laws governing CalPERS, JRS
SB 987
Page 2
I and II, and LRS apply equally to a registered domestic
partner, or partnership, to the extent provided by the
domestic partnership provisions in the Family Code.
c) Align CalPERS Investment Reporting to Financial Industry
Standards. Existing law requires CalPERS to provide the
Legislature a review of the system's assets on a quarterly
basis that includes, among other things, both time-weighted
and dollar-weighted investment rates of return on a
five-year, three-year, two-year, and one-year basis.
According to the bill's sponsor, CalPERS, reporting
investment returns on a two-year basis: 1) deviates from
financial industry standards, which specifies calculations
on a five-year, three-year, and one-year basis; 2) requires
additional time and expense for CalPERS to furnish such
information, which is not used for any other purpose; and
3) is not required by statute for other public retirement
systems in California. This bill removes the two year
reporting requirement. CalPERS argues this aligns CalPERS
financial reporting to financial industry standards and
existing requirements for other public retirement systems.
2) Proposed amendments. The proposed amendments would
clarify in statute that CalPERS can pay the cafeteria,
parking and other building vendor contracts through the
CalPERS building fund and correct drafting errors in budget
trailer bills.
3) There is no registered opposition to this bill .
Analysis Prepared by : Roger Dunstan / APPR. / (916) 319-2081