BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 8, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   SB 1064 (De León) - As Amended:  April 16, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                             JudiciaryVote:8-0
                       Human Services                         4-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill provides a variety of protections for children of 
          immigrant families in family law proceedings. Specifically, this 
          bill: 

          1)Allows a relative to file for guardianship of a child 
            regardless of immigration status, and provides that 
            immigration status of the relative alone shall not constitute 
            unsuitability.
             
          2)Ensures equal treatment of relatives seeking custody of a 
            child regardless of the relatives' immigration status, through 
            a variety of measures. For example:

             a)   Specifies that a relative caregiver shall be given 
               information regarding the permanency options of 
               guardianship and adoption regardless of his or her 
               immigration status.

             b)   Provides that a relative's identification card from a 
               foreign consulate or a foreign passport shall be considered 
               valid forms of identification when a social worker is 
               deciding where to place a child.

          3)Authorizes an extension of reunification services for parents 
            who have been arrested and issued an immigration hold, 
            detained by DHS, or deported to their country of origin.

          4)Instructs family law courts to direct parents who have been 
            deported to child welfare services in their country of origin, 
            document parents' participation in those services, and accept 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  2

            reports from local child welfare authorities as to the 
            parents' living situation and participation in services.

          5)Requires The Department of Social Services (DSS), prior to 
            July 1, 2013, to provide guidance to counties and 
            municipalities to establish memoranda of understanding (MOUs) 
            with foreign consulates in custody cases in which a parent has 
            been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained, or 
            deported, including specified procedures relating to family 
            reunification.

          6)Requires DSS, prior to July 1, 2013, to provide guidelines to 
            counties and municipalities detailing procedures for social 
            workers to assist eligible children in child custody and 
            dependency cases to take advantage of special immigrant 
            juvenile status and any other form of relief available under 
            immigration law.


           FISCAL EFFECT

           1)Potential one-time costs in excess of $150,000 (GF) for 
            increased DSS staffing workload for development of specified 
            guidelines to counties. 

          2)Annual ongoing state-mandated costs in the range of $200,000 
            (GF) for specified extension of reunification services for 
            impacted youth. 

            Roughly 700 foster children in California have a detained or 
            deported parent. If the court determines that 50 % of these 
            cases warrant an extension under this bill's provisions, and 
            the state provides these children with an average of four 
            additional months of reunification services, at approximately 
            $1,167 per four months of extra social worker expenses, the 
            state would incur costs of approximately $410,000 ($205,000 
            GF) annually.

          3)Annual ongoing costs in the range of $150,000 (GF) for 
            increased workload to the Department of Justice (DOJ) Foreign 
            Prosecutions and Law Enforcement Unit, to assist child 
            services agencies and district attorneys in their interactions 
            with the Mexican government. 

          4)Minor increased cost pressure on social worker workload to 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  3

            include information in case plans about parents' detention or 
            deportation. 

          5)Potentially significant future cost savings in foster care and 
            adoption systems if this bill results in an increased number 
            of children reunified with their parents or relatives, due to 
            decreased need for foster care services or Adoption Assistance 
            payments (AAP). 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background and Purpose  . This bill seeks to eliminate family 
            reunification barriers in the child welfare system faced by 
            immigrant families. This bill grants an extension in the 
            family reunification process when parents are detained or 
            deported. Where reunification is not immediately available, 
            this bill seeks to ensure that children can be placed with 
            relatives, regardless of their immigration status.

            A November 2011 report prepared by the Applied Research Center 
            estimated that 5,100 children living in foster care nationwide 
            have parents who have been detained or deported. The report 
            predicted that the number of children in foster care with 
            deported or detained parents could grow by another 15,000 in 
            the next five years. Extrapolating from the report's 
            nationwide numbers, supporters estimate that 700 children 
            currently in the California foster care system have detained 
            or deported parents.  

           2)State Mandate for Local MOUs with Foreign Governments  . This 
            bill requires DSS to provide guidance to counties to establish 
            MOUs with foreign consulates to smooth the handling of family 
            law cases in which a parent has been deported.  The MOU must 
            include, among other things, procedures for contacting a 
            foreign consulate at the onset of a child custody case, 
            locating a detained parent, facilitating family reunification 
            once a parent has been deported, aiding the safe transfer of a 
            child to the parent's country of origin, and communicating 
            with relevant departments and services in that country. Los 
            Angeles, San Francisco and several other counties have MOUs 
            with their local Mexican consulates that define 
            responsibilities for each entity and ensure confidentiality of 
            information exchanged. 

            DSS states that when providing guidance to local governments 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  4

            on this issue, their implementation options vary and thus the 
            costs resulting from this provision are difficult to predict. 
            On the low end, costs may be minor and absorbable. On the high 
            end, DSS may need several new staff positions to handle 
            workload.

           3)Support  . This bill is supported by a lengthy list of civil 
            rights groups, immigration groups, children's rights groups, 
            religious organizations, and other entities. There is no known 
            opposition.



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jonathan Stein / APPR. / (916) 319-2081