BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1064 (De León)
          As Amended April 16, 2012
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :28-7  
           
           JUDICIARY           8-0         HUMAN SERVICES      4-0         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Feuer, Atkins, Dickinson, |Ayes:|Beall, Ammiano, Hall,     |
          |     |Gorell, Huber, Monning,   |     |Portantino                |
          |     |Wieckowski, Chesbro       |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Gatto, Blumenfield,       |     |                          |
          |     |Bradford, Charles         |     |                          |
          |     |Calderon, Campos, Davis,  |     |                          |
          |     |Fuentes, Hall, Hill,      |     |                          |
          |     |Cedillo, Mitchell,        |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio                   |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Harkey, Donnelly,         |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Norby, Wagner    |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Provides family and custodial protections for children 
          of immigrant families.  Specifically,  this bill  : 

          1)States that a relative's immigration status does not 
            disqualify the relative from receiving custody of a child in a 
            family law proceeding.

          2)Allows a relative to file for guardianship of a minor 
            dependent regardless of immigration status and provides that 
            immigration status of the relative alone shall not constitute 
            unsuitability. 

          3)Directs that if a social worker, upon investigation of the 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  2


            circumstances of a child being taken into temporary custody, 
            decides that it is appropriate to release the child to his or 
            her parent, guardian or a responsible relative, that release 
            shall occur regardless of the adult's immigration status.

          4)Provides that a relative's identification card from a foreign 
            consulate or a foreign passport shall be considered valid 
            forms of identification for the purposes of conducting 
            criminal record and fingerprint clearance checks when a social 
            worker is deciding whether to place a child in the temporary 
            custody of a relative or into the home of a relative as a 
            foster care placement.

          5)Specifies that when a social worker is placing a child in a 
            foster care setting, the home of a noncustodial parent or 
            approved home of a relative may be considered regardless of 
            the parent's or relative's immigration status.

          6)Specifies that when a relative has requested placement of a 
            child who is removed from parental custody, preferential 
            consideration be given to the family member regardless of that 
            relative's immigration status.

          7)Specifies that a relative caregiver shall be given information 
            regarding the permanency options of guardianship and adoption 
            regardless of his or her immigration status.

          8)Authorizes an extension of reunification services from 6 or 12 
            months to 18 or 24 months, as specified, for parents who have 
            been arrested and issued an immigration hold, detained by the 
            United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), or 
            deported to their country of origin.

          9)Adds detention by DHS and deportation to a parent's country of 
            origin to the list of circumstances that must be considered by 
            the dependency court in determining appropriate reunification 
            services for a child.

          10)Directs the court to provide reasonable efforts to assist 
            parents who have been deported to contact child welfare 
            authorities in their country of origin, identify any available 
            services that would substantially comply with case plan 
            requirements, document parents' participation in those 
            services, and accept reports from local child welfare 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  3


            authorities as to the parents' living situation, progress and 
            participation in services.

          11)Adds a parent's detention to the list of circumstances 
            eligible for alternative family reunification services.  Adds 
            a parent's detention or deportation to the list of 
            circumstances that a court must consider in determining 
            whether the failure of the parent to participate in services 
            is prima facie evidence that reunification would be 
            detrimental to the child.

          12)Permits the court to continue a child's permanency review 
            hearing for up to six months if the parent has been arrested 
            and issued an immigration hold, detained by DHS or deported 
            and the court determines that either the parent has made 
            reasonable efforts to regain custody of the child or 
            termination of parental rights would be detrimental to the 
            child.

          13)Requires the court to consider a parent's detention or 
            deportation as barriers to that parent's ability to 
            participate in reunification when determining a child's 
            permanency plan.

          14)Adds to the list of circumstances under which a dependency 
            court may extend a child's permanency hearing that a parent is 
            making progress in reunification services after being recently 
            discharged from the custody of DHS or recently returned to the 
            United States following deportation to his or her country of 
            origin.
             
           15)Requires the Department of Social Services (DSS), prior to 
            July 1, 2013, to provide guidance to counties and 
            municipalities to establish memoranda of understanding with 
            foreign consulates in custody cases in which a parent has been 
            arrested and issued an immigration hold, has been detained by 
            DHS, or has been deported to his or her country of origin, 
            including specified procedures relating to family 
            reunification. 
             
           16)Requires DSS, prior to July 1, 2013, to provide guidelines to 
            counties and municipalities detailing procedures for social 
            workers to assist children in child custody and dependency 
            cases who are eligible for special immigrant juvenile status 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  4


            and any other form of relief available under immigration law.  


           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires a social worker to attempt to maintain the child with 
            the child's family.  Absent specified circumstances, requires 
            the social worker to immediately release the child to the 
            custody of the child's parent, guardian, or relative.  

          2)Requires a social worker to use due diligence in investigating 
            the names and locations of relatives who are able and willing 
            to care for a dependent child.  Requires social workers to 
            conduct an assessment of a relative or non-relative's 
            suitability, including an in-home inspection and a criminal 
            records check.  

          3)Provides that, in pursuing family reunification, the court 
            shall order reasonable services for incarcerated or 
            institutionalized parents, and must consider the parent's 
            access to the court-mandated services and his or her ability 
            to maintain contact with his or her child.  Allows for court 
            ordered services in pursuit of family reunification to be 
            extended from 6 or 12 months to 18 or 24 months, as specified, 
            for parents who are incarcerated, institutionalized, or 
            ordered into a resident substance abuse program if the court 
            makes particular findings.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee:
           
           1)Potential one-time costs in excess of $150,000 (General Fund 
            (GF)) for increased DSS staffing workload for development of 
            specified guidelines to counties. 

          2)Annual ongoing state-mandated costs in the range of $200,000 
            (GF) for specified extension of reunification services for 
            impacted youth. 

            Roughly 700 foster children in California have a detained or 
            deported parent. If the court determines that 50% of these 
            cases warrant an extension under this bill's provisions, and 
            the state provides these children with an average of four 
            additional months of reunification services, at approximately 








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  5


            $1,167 per four months of extra social worker expenses, the 
            state would incur costs of approximately $410,000 ($205,000 
            GF) annually.

          3)Annual ongoing costs in the range of $150,000 (GF) for 
            increased workload to the Department of Justice (DOJ) Foreign 
            Prosecutions and Law Enforcement Unit, to assist child 
            services agencies and district attorneys in their interactions 
            with the Mexican government. 

          4)Minor increased cost pressure on social worker workload to 
            include information in case plans about parents' detention or 
            deportation. 

          5)Potentially significant future cost savings in foster care and 
            adoption systems if this bill results in an increased number 
            of children reunified with their parents or relatives, due to 
            decreased need for foster care services or Adoption Assistance 
            payments (AAP). 

           COMMENTS  :  This bill seeks to reduce barriers faced by immigrant 
          families who come in contact with the child welfare system.  
          Immigration laws attempt to keep family together, whether or not 
          parents are deported.  Child welfare policies also strive for 
          family reunification.  In practice, however, it is often the 
          case that these policies are not achieved for families with 
          undocumented parents.  When parents are detained or deported 
          and, as a result, their children become dependents of the court, 
          reunification often does not happen within the required 
          timeframe.  If these children are not taken in by relatives, 
          they may remain in the foster care system with strangers and 
          their parents' rights may be terminated.

          This bill seeks to create uniform, statewide policies and 
          practices that eliminate family reunification barriers in the 
          child welfare system for immigrant families.  This bill grants 
          an extension in the family reunification period where parents 
          are detained or deported.  Where reunification is not 
          immediately available, this bill seeks to ensure that children 
          can be placed with relatives, regardless of their immigration 
          status.  


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334








                                                                  SB 1064
                                                                  Page  6




                                                                FN: 0004955