BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                     SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE
                            Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
          

          BILL NO:  SB 1179                     HEARING:  5/9/12
          AUTHOR:  Walters                      FISCAL:  Yes
          VERSION:  4/10/12                     TAX LEVY:  Yes
          CONSULTANT:  Grinnell                 

                    TAX CREDIT FOR HIRING DISABLED VETERANS
          

          Enacts a tax credit of $3,000 for hiring a disabled veteran 
                            in specified industries.


                           Background and Existing Law  

          State law allows taxpayers to claim tax credits designed as 
          incentives for taxpayers to incur certain expenses, such as 
          child adoption, or to influence behavior, including 
          business practices and decisions, such as research and 
          development credits and Geographically Targeted Economic 
          Development Area (GTEDA) credits.  The Legislature 
          typically enacts such tax incentives to encourage taxpayers 
          to do something but for the tax credit, they would 
          otherwise not do.


                                   Proposed Law  

          Commencing in the 2013 taxable year, Senate Bill 1179 
          allows a taxpayer primarily engaged in the business of 
          surgical appliance and supplies manufacturing a tax credit 
          of $3,000 for each net increase in full-time employment of 
          disabled veterans, as defined.  The measure provides that 
          FTB administers the credit, and caps the total amount of 
          credit at $100 million.  FTB must periodically update its 
          website with the amount of credits that taxpayers have 
          claimed.  

          To qualify, the taxpayer must have either paid wages to the 
          disabled veteran for not less than an average of 35 hours 
          per week, or paid the disabled veteran a full-time salary.  
          The measure does not allow taxpayers to claim both this 
          credit and any other for the same employee, but does 
          provide that the credit does not affect any business 
          expense deduction from income any wages paid to disabled 




          SB 1179 -- 4/10/12 -- Page 2



          veterans.  Taxpayers may only claim the credit on 
          timely-filed original returns, but may carry over the 
          credit for seven years.

          SB 1179 imports the definition of wages, the method of 
          measuring the credit on a full-time equivalent basis, 
          anti-abuse requirements, and procedures for FTB to 
          administer the credit from the New Jobs Credit (ABx3 15 
          Krekorian, SBx3 15 Calderon, 2009).  

                              State Revenue Impact
           
          According to the Franchise Tax Board, revenue losses 
          resulting from SB 1179 are estimated to be $200,000 in 
          2012-13, $600,000 in 2013-14, and $800,000 in 2014-15.


                                     Comments  

          1.   Purpose of the bill  .  The purpose of the bill is to 
          increase disabled veterans employment in the surgical 
          appliance and device manufacturing sector.

          2.   Sure, but will it work  ?  The central policy question 
          posed by SB 1179 is whether a $3,000 tax credit will 
          increase employment of disabled veterans.  While the 
          Committee is not aware of any research specific to state 
          tax credits for hiring veterans, Daniel Wilson, assistant 
          director of the Center for the Study of Innovation and 
          Productivity at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 
          and Robert Chirinko of the University of Illinois examined 
          state hiring tax credits enacted between January 1990 and 
          August 2009.  The authors found that states where employers 
          could qualify for credits immediately after enactment had 
          an employment increase of 0.12%.  However, states that 
          offered the credits retroactively actually saw a slight 
          decline of 0.06% in employment.  These findings suggest 
          that general hiring credits, at least at the state level, 
          are not an effective tool for stimulating job growth.  

          Additionally, California currently invests in job training 
          programs, affords special treatment for disabled veterans 
          business enterprises, and GTEDA tax credits in the hopes of 
          increasing employment for disabled veterans.  What evidence 
          exists that tax credits are superior to current programs 
          for achieving the stated goals?  The Committee may wish to 





          SB 1179 -- 4/10/12 -- Page 3



          consider whether enacting a tax credit with the same target 
          population as current programs duplicates existing efforts.

          3.   Breadboxes and Elephants  .  SB 1179 largely mirrors the 
          New Jobs Credit enacted by the Legislature as part of the 
          2009-10 Budget Act, but applies its provisions specifically 
          to veterans, while not limiting eligible taxpayers to those 
          with less than 20 employees.  Like that credit, the measure 
          sets a fixed cap on credits, allocates on a first-come, 
          first-served basis, and awards a $3,000 credit for each 
          taxpayer's net increase in full-time equivalent units.  
          ABx3 15/SBx3 15 allocated $400 million in credits; however, 
          as of April 7th, taxpayers have only claimed $98 million.  
          To be effective, the Legislature should want to allocate an 
          amount sufficient to substantively change decision making, 
          but given the slow rate of participation for the Jobs 
          credit, and SB 1179's limit to one industry, is allocating 
          $100 million too much?  The Committee may wish to consider 
          amending SB 1179 to reduce the amount of credit allocated 
          to ensure that sufficient demand exists.  Furthermore, the 
          Committee may wish to consider a sunset date of 3 to 5 
          years in which to review the efficacy of the credit.

          4.   Industry Snapshot  .  Surgical appliance and device 
          manufacturing are a significant industry in California.  
          Examples of products manufactured by such businesses 
          include orthopedic devices, prosthetic appliances, surgical 
          dressings, crutches, surgical sutures, hospital beds, and 
          operating room tables.  According to the 2007 Economic 
          Census, of the 2,219 surgical appliance and device 
          manufacturing establishments in the United States, 
          California has 296, or 13.3% of the U.S. total, employing 
          22,145 people (19%) with an annual payroll of $1.2 billion 
          (20%).  By value, California ships 15.3% of U.S. shipments. 
           By comparison, California generates 13% of U.S. Gross 
          Domestic Product, and has 12% of U.S. population.

          5.   Suggested Amendments  .  FTB and Committee Staff suggest 
          the following amendments:
                 To avoid disputes between taxpayers and the FTB, 
               add language similar to the language contained in 
               Revenue and Taxation Code Section 19136.8, which 
               provides an underpayment of estimated tax penalty 
               exemption relating to the $400 million cap and cut-off 
               date for the New Jobs Credit.
                 Delete lines 10 and 11 on page 2, and lines 18 and 





          SB 1179 -- 4/10/12 -- Page 4



               19 on page 5, as the term "acquire" is already defined 
               in Revenue and Taxation Sections 17276.20(f)(6) and 
               24416.20(g)(6).
                 On page 2, line 22, and page 5, line 30, between 
               "qualified" and "employee" insert "full-time."


                         Support and Opposition  (5/3/12)

           Support  :  Unknown.

           Opposition  :  Unknown.