BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1196| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ CONSENT Bill No: SB 1196 Author: Hernandez (D), et al. Amended: 4/10/12 Vote: 21 SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE : 9-0, 4/18/12 AYES: Hernandez, Harman, Alquist, Anderson, Blakeslee, De León, DeSaulnier, Rubio, Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 SUBJECT : Claims data disclosure SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill prohibits a health care services plan (health plan) or health insurance contract between a plan/insurer (carrier) and a provider, including a provider of supplies, from prohibiting, conditioning, or in any way restricting the disclosure of claims data related to health care services provided to enrollees, insureds, or beneficiaries of any self-funded health coverage arrangement to an entity certified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to generate public reports on the performance of health care providers. ANALYSIS : Existing law: CONTINUED SB 1196 Page 2 1. Provides for the regulation of health plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and for the regulation of health insurance by the Department of Insurance. 2. Prohibits contracts between carriers and hospitals or health care facilities owned by a licensed hospital from containing any provision that restricts the ability of the carrier from furnishing information to subscribers, enrollees, policyholders, or insureds concerning cost range of procedures or the quality of services. 3. Provides hospitals at least 20 days in advance to review the methodology and data developed and compiled by the carriers, requires utilization of appropriate risk adjustment factors for quality data, requires a disclosure on the carrier's website about the data developed and compiled by the carriers and an opportunity for a hospital to provide a link where the hospital's response to the data can be accessed. This bill prohibits any health plan or health insurance contract between a carrier and a provider, including a provider of supplies, from prohibiting, conditioning, or in any way restricting the disclosure of claims data related to health care services provided to enrollees, insureds, or beneficiaries of any self-funded health coverage arrangement to an entity certified by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to generate public reports on the performance of health care providers. Background Managing costs . According to a February 2008 California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF) fact sheet, consumers are paying more attention to the cost of their health care because they have greater responsibility for paying for it. People with insurance are coping with higher deductibles and copayments and some are being offered consumer-driven health savings accounts as an alternative to traditional insurance. Those who lack health insurance have an even more daunting task of anticipating and managing their health care costs. Whether insured or uninsured, consumers need to understand their financial liability and find the best value. Additionally, employers have an increased CONTINUED SB 1196 Page 3 interest in price transparency in order to improve health care outcomes for their employees and to slow the growth rate of health care expenditures. Despite this, consumers often do not have the tools to make informed decisions based on cost and quality of care because some providers have prevented price and quality information from being disclosed. Usefulness of data . A March 2006 report by The Commonwealth Fund argues knowing prices of health care services is of little value without information on the total cost of caring for a given condition and the quality or outcomes of that care. Transparency and better public information on cost and quality are essential for three reasons: (1) To help providers improve by benchmarking their performance against others; (2) to encourage private insurers and public programs to reward quality and efficiency; and (3) to help patients make informed decisions about their care. Transparency can also play an important role in leveling the playing field, as it can shed light on the practice of charging patients different prices for the same care. A March 31, 2012 Los Angeles Times article entitled, "The bizarre calculus of emergency room charges," highlighted a number of discrepancies in charges for health care services that, at times, did not seem to make sense. For example, a man with health insurance was billed $13,000 for an MRI scan of his shoulder that required him to pay $2,500 out of pocket while his brother-in-law, who lacks health care coverage, was billed $350 for the same procedure. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes SUPPORT : (Verified 4/30/12) Blue Shield of California California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO Pacific Business Group on Health San Diego Electrical Pension Trust Small Business California ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : Blue Shield of California states that this bill advances an important provision of the ACA CONTINUED SB 1196 Page 4 that promotes transparency in the provision of health care services, giving beneficiaries access to information that will help them make more informed decisions about their health care. The California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO (CSEA), writes that this bill will make it possible for consumers and purchasers to access data on cost, quality, and health care outcomes, so they can make informed decisions. CSEA states that it is absolutely important to have data available so that comparisons and important health care analyses on cost, quality, and performance can be done. The Pacific Business Group on Health argues public disclosure of the relative quality and cost of providers drives improved quality and cost transparency more rapidly than private reporting. CTW:mw 5/1/12 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED