BILL ANALYSIS Ó ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 1202| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ UNFINISHED BUSINESS Bill No: SB 1202 Author: Leno (D) Amended: 8/20/12 Vote: 21 SENATE BUSINESS, PROF. & ECON. DEVELOP COMM : 9-0, 4/09/12 AYES: Price, Emmerson, Corbett, Correa, Hernandez, Negrete McLeod, Strickland, Vargas, Wyland SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 7-0, 5/24/12 AYES: Kehoe, Walters, Alquist, Dutton, Lieu, Price, Steinberg SENATE FLOOR : 38-0, 5/30/12 AYES: Alquist, Anderson, Berryhill, Blakeslee, Calderon, Cannella, Corbett, Correa, De León, DeSaulnier, Dutton, Emmerson, Evans, Fuller, Gaines, Hancock, Harman, Hernandez, Huff, Kehoe, La Malfa, Leno, Lieu, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, Price, Rubio, Simitian, Steinberg, Vargas, Walters, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee NO VOTE RECORDED: Runner, Strickland ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 78-0, 8/23/12 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Dental hygienists SOURCE : California Dental Hygienists Association DIGEST : This bill makes a number of clean up changes CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 2 regarding the licensure and regulation of registered dental hygienists by the Dental Hygiene Committee of California (DHCC); and increases various regulatory fee ceilings. Assembly Amendments (1) delete the provision which provided that the mandatory continuing education requirements not exceed 10 hours per renewal period; (2) delete the provision which specified that providers approved by the Dental Board of California may be deemed approved by the DHCC; (3) delete the provision which authorized the DHCC to adopt by regulation a measure of continued competency as a condition of license renewal; (4) decrease the biennial license renewal fee from $250 to $160; and (5) clarify the fee for certification of licensure not exceed one-half of the renewal fee. ANALYSIS : Existing law: 1. Licenses and regulates registered dental hygienists (RDH), registered dental hygienists in alternative practice (RDHAP), and registered dental hygienists in extended functions by the DHCC under the Dental Board of California (DBC) within the Department of Consumer Affairs. 2. Requires the DHCC to perform specified functions, including, the evaluation of all RDH, RDHAP, and registered dental hygienists in extended functions educational programs that apply for approval. Provides that, any dental hygiene program accredited by and in good standing with the Commission on Dental Accreditation is required to be approved by the DHCC. 3. Authorizes the DHCC to employ employees and examiners necessary to carry out the functions of the DHCC. 4. Establishes the requirements which an applicant must meet to be issued an RDH license, including completion of specified educational and examination requirements. 5. Authorizes the DHCC to issue a RDH license to an applicant who has not taken the specified clinical examination, if the applicant submits certain information including proof that he or she has been in CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 3 clinical practice as an RDH or has been a full-time faculty member of an accredited RDH education program for at least 5 years preceding the application date, and proof that the applicant has not been subject to disciplinary action by another state where he or she was previously licensed as an RDH. 6. Under a general provision, prohibits a Department of Consumer Affairs licensing board, including the DHCC, from imposing limitations or additional requirements on an applicant to take an examination when the applicant has failed a prior examination. 7. Authorizes a licensed RDHAP to perform specified functions and procedures in residences of the homebound, schools, residential facilities, and dental health professional shortage areas. 8. Specifies that an RDHAP may not provide services without a written prescription for dental hygiene services from a dentist or physician and specifies that failure to comply with the requirement shall be considered unprofessional conduct. 9. Authorizes the DHCC, as a condition of license renewal, to require licensees to complete up 7.5 hours of continuing education per renewal period, as specified. 10.Requires continuing education course providers to be approved by the DHCC and specifies that providers approved by the Dental Board of California shall be deemed approved by the DHCC. 11.Requires the DHCC to establish by resolution the amount of the fees, subject to specified maximum fee amounts, that relate to the licensed under its jurisdiction. This bill: 1. Authorizes the DHCC to issue a special permit to a RDH licensed in another state authorizing him or her to teach in a dental hygiene program in California without holding a California license upon meeting certain requirements, including the completion of educational CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 4 and examination requirements and the payment of an application fee, subject to biennial renewal fee, for the special permit. 2. Recasts the provision requiring the DHCC to approve an educational program accredited by the Commission on Dental Accreditation to instead make it permissive, that the DHCC may approve such an educational program. 3. Requires an applicant for a RDH license to complete a Committee-approved instruction in gingival soft tissue curettage, nitrous oxide-oxygen analgesia, and local anesthesia. 4. Revises the requirements for issuing a California license to a RDH licensed in another state to require: A. The out-of-state experience to have been obtained in the five years immediately preceding the application date. B. Expands the information relating to disciplinary action to include any other state where the applicant was previously issued any professional or vocational license. C. Proof that the applicant has not, more than one time in the prior 5 years, failed the DHCC's clinical examination, the examination given by the Western Regional Examining Board, or any other clinical dental hygiene examination approved by the DHCC. 1. Prohibits an applicant for a RDH license who has failed the clinical examination three times, or who has failed the examination because he or she has imposed gross trauma on a patient from being eligible to take the examination again until the applicant completes remedial education approved by the DHCC. 2. Authorizes a RDHAP to operate a mobile dental hygiene clinic, as specified, and establishes a fee not to exceed $250. CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 5 3. Requires a RDHAP to register his or her place or places of practice, within 30 days with the DHCC. 4. Authorizes a RDHAP to apply for approval of the DHCC to have an additional place of practice, and establishes a biennial renewal fee. 5. Authorizes the DHCC to seek an injunction against a violation by a RDHAP of the requirement to obtain a prescription prior to rendering services 6. Specifies that providing services without a written prescription on the part of a RDHAP shall constitute unprofessional practice and a cause revocation of suspension of the license. 7. Requires the Committee to grant or renew approval of only those educational programs that meet their standards and, where appropriate, meet the minimum standards set by the commission or an equivalent body, as determined by the committee. 8. Requires a new educational program for registered dental hygienists, as defined, to also submit a feasibility study demonstrating a need for a new educational program and requires a new educational program to apply to the committee for specified approval prior to seeking initial accreditation from the commission or an equivalent body, as determined by the committee. 9. Defines "extramural dental facility" to mean any clinical facility that has contracted with an approved dental hygiene educational program for instruction in dental hygiene which exists outside or beyond the walls, boundaries, or precincts of the primary campus of the approved program and in which dental hygiene services are rendered. Requires a dental hygiene educational program shall register an extramural dental facility with the DHCC as specified. 10.Increases the maximum fee amounts for various fees as follows: CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 6 A. Application for an original license, and the fee for issuance of an original license, from $70 to $250. B. Biennial license renewal fee from $80 to $160. C. Curriculum review and site evaluation for dental hygiene educational programs fee from $1,400 to $2,100. 1. Establishes new maximum fees as follows: A. The fee for registration of an extramural dental facility shall not exceed $250. B. The fee for registration of a mobile dental hygiene unit shall not exceed $150. C. The biennial renewal fee for a mobile dental hygiene unit shall not exceed $250. D. The fee for an additional office permit shall not exceed $250. E. The biennial renewal fee for an additional office shall not exceed $250. F. The initial application and biennial special permit fee is equal to the biennial license renewal fee. 1. Specifies the fee for certification of licensure shall not exceed one-half of the renewal fee. 2. Makes technical, nonsubstantive and conforming changes Background The following is background and reasons for the specific provisions of the bill as indicated by the author: 1.Special Permits . The bill creates a special permit that allows a RDH licensed in another state to teach in a CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 7 California dental hygiene program without a license provided that he or she obtains a special permit form the DHCC. Similar language and a special permit already exists for dentistry. Educational programs such as dentistry often hire subject experts to teach in their programs. If a dental school wants to hire a DDS from another state, who is a dental expert in his or her field, to lecture for a semester, they may do so with a special permit. Currently, dental hygiene programs cannot invite out-of-state dental hygienists because no special permit exists for RDHs. Establishing a special permit for RDHs will allow dental hygiene programs to contract with subject experts from outside of California to teach in the programs. 2.Completion of Course in Expanded Functions for Initial Licensure . The bill clarifies that all RDHs seeking licensure must all meet the same level of education. All graduates of California dental hygiene programs have education in expanded functions as that is a requirement of licensure. Many out of state dental hygienists do not have the training or education in expanded functions because these functions are not allowed in their states. By standardizing the educational requirements for all RDHs seeking California licensure, consumers are ensured that all applicants have met the same standards and training for expanded functions. 3.Out-of-State License Applicant Requirements . The bill requires that program hours to be used towards licensure must be in the immediately preceding five years. The bill requires proof that the applicant has not been subject to any professional disciplinary action or monitoring in another state. The bill clarifies that the applicant must prove he or she has not previously failed the DHCC's or another clinical examination. The Western Regional Examination Board (WREB) provides the national test recognized by DHCC. The bill clarifies that the applicant must prove he or she has not failed WREB. Additionally, consumers are protected by requiring clearer licensure requirements for out-of-state RDHs. Out-of-state licensees who have not practiced for more CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 8 than five years are required to pass a clinical competence exam in order to obtain California licensure. Furthermore, out-of-state applicants are responsible for providing proof that they have not been subject to disciplinary action or monitoring in another state. These changes will ensure that out-of-state RDHs are not coming to California to escape disciplinary actions in another state. With the current process of licensure by credential and/or allowing graduates from other states to take WREB for initial licensure, it is critical that the DHCC ensures that the applicant has not failed the clinical examination. All California dental hygiene students must pass a clinical licensure examination to be licensed. This language will ensure that dental hygiene students from other states must also pass a clinical licensure examination. 4.Remediation Requirements . The bill requires applicants failing the clinical examination three times, or applicants causing gross trauma, to provide proof of remediation prior to re-taking the examination. If a dental hygiene student is unable to pass the examination after three attempts, remediation is required before they are allowed to re-take the examination. Remediation is also required for students retaking the examination if the student, in a previous clinical examination (which uses public patients), caused gross trauma that required intervention by a doctor or dentist as well as follow-up by a medical or dental professional. Consumers need assurance that a student who has previously caused gross trauma during an examination will not do the same in a subsequent examination. 5.Mobile Clinics . The bill authorizes RDHAPs to establish mobile clinics. The DHCC also licenses RDHAPs to work with patients outside the current traditional dental care delivery system. RDHAPs are homebound, in residential care facilities, schools, rural areas and/or institutions. Allowing RDHAPs to have a mobile clinic will further increase their ability to bring crucial services to individuals who require additional attention and increased access to care. CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 9 6.Requires RDHAPs to Register Additional Sites . Currently, all dentists must register their practice location sites with the CDB in order to maintain oversight of the additional sites. Similarly, the bill requires RDHAPs, who own their own practices, to report all of their registered sights to the DHCC. 7.Increase Statutory Maximum Fee Levels . Sought by and supported by the California Dental Hygienists Association, the increase in the cap will give the DHCC flexibility to keep the fund solvent and would be comparable to fee structures in other states. Any actual fee increase would be required to go through the regulatory process, according to the Sponsor. In a January 31, 2012 letter, the DHCC requests that the current fee ceiling be increased to give DHCC more flexibility to maintain necessary funds for the functions of the DHCC. The DHCC states that the proposal is not an actual fee increase, just an increase to the fee ceiling that the the DHCC may charge for a biennial license renewal. The fee ceiling has not been modified for over two decades (1990) and was increased from $30 to $80 at that time. Some examples of other biennial license renewal fees in other states are: New York = $128; Maine = $175; and Nevada = $600. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee: One-time costs for development and promulgation of regulations and standards related to approval of educational programs, registration of places of practice and mobile clinics for RDH-APs, and registration of extramural dental facilities, as well as workload analysis to support fee increases, in the range of $80,000. One-time costs in the range of $100,000 to modify informational technology (IT) systems to support a number of changes made by this bill. CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 10 Likely minor ongoing costs, under $50,000, to manage various new requirements and to exercise the additional authority granted to the committee by this bill. All costs would be funded through the Dental Hygiene special fund. As this bill raises statutory maximum levels for existing fees and creates statutory maximum levels for new fees, additional revenue will not be generated until the committee increases fees by resolution as authorized under existing law. However, additional costs related to this bill are expected to be fully covered by increased fee revenue. SUPPORT : (Verified 5/24/12)(unable to reverify at time of writing) California Dental Hygienists Association (source) Dental Hygiene Committee of California ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 78-0, 08/23/12 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Beth Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gatto, Gordon, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hill, Huber, Hueso, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lara, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mansoor, Mendoza, Miller, Mitchell, Monning, Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Portantino, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Valadao, Wagner, Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NO VOTE RECORDED: Donnelly, Roger Hernández JJA:nl 8/25/12 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED SB 1202 Page 11 CONTINUED