BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1206
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 8, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                   SB 1206 (Walters) - As Amended:  August 6, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                              JudiciaryVote:9 - 
          0 

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill limits passport applications for children during 
          divorce and custody proceedings and allows a court to order the 
          freezing of certain assets when it issues a protective custody 
          warrant for a child.  Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Provides that, in a dissolution proceeding, parents are 
            restricted from applying for a passport or replacement 
            passport for any minor child without written consent from the 
            other parent or a court order.  
           
           2)Provides that a protective custody warrant issued by a court 
            to secure the recovery of an unlawfully detained or concealed 
            child may also contain an order to freeze any funds held in a 
            California bank account of the party alleged to be in 
            possession of the child.  

          3)Provides that any order to freeze assets may be terminated, 
            modified or vacated by the court upon a finding that the 
            release of assets will not jeopardize the safety or best 
            interest of a child. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Costs associated with this legislation would be minor and 
          absorbable within existing resources. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . International child abductions are challenging to 
            prevent with state law alone.  Accordingly, federal law and 








                                                                  SB 1206
                                                                  Page  2

            international agreements have attempted to address this 
            problem.  Despite lawmakers' efforts, parental child 
            abductions to foreign countries have almost doubled since 
            2006.  This bill seeks to add protections to existing law to 
            further prevent international parental child abduction. The 
            author notes that in 2010, the U.S. State Department reported 
            2,488 children abducted to other countries from the United 
            States

            While the Synclair-Cannon Act developed a framework for 
            preventing child abductions, there are some areas where the 
            law can be strengthened to further deter international 
            abductions from taking place. The intent of this legislation 
            is to strengthen those areas by restricting parents from 
            applying for passports for minor children without consent from 
            both parents and allowing the court to freeze the assets of a 
            parent who has unlawfully concealed their child. The sponsors, 
            Bring Abducted Children Home, argues that this will provide 
            essential additional barriers to prevent international child 
            abduction.  
           
          2)Background  . The Synclair-Cannon Act, passed by the Legislature 
            in 2002  in response to child abductions by parents, attempts 
            to prevent abductions by requiring courts in custody or 
            visitation proceedings to consider specified factors 
            indicating a risk of abduction and implement specified 
            preventive measures.  (AB 2441 (Bates), Chap. 856, Stats. 
            2002.)  Over the past decade, these provisions have dictated 
            the standard California courts use to determine and impose 
            necessary restrictions when a risk of parental child abduction 
            exists.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 
          319-2081