BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair


          SB 1207 (Fuller) - California Alternative Rates for Energy 
          program.
          
          Amended: May 1, 2012            Policy Vote: EU&C 12-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: May 24, 2012      Consultant: Marie Liu
          
          SUSPENSE FILE.  AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.

          
          Bill Summary: SB 1207 authorizes investor owned utilities (IOUs) 
          to take certain actions on participants of the California 
          Alternative Rates for Energy (CARE) program whose usage exceeds 
          400% and 600% of the baseline in any monthly billing cycle 
          including requesting proof of income eligibility for the 
          program, conducting a residential energy audit, and requiring 
          participation in an energy savings assistance program.

          Fiscal Impact: Potential one-time costs of $150,000 from the 
          Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account 
          (special fund) in 2013-14 for a proceeding.

          Background: The CARE program provides a discount for electric 
          and gas service for customers whose incomes are below 200% of 
          the federal poverty guideline levels and limits the rate 
          structure for CARE customers to no more than three usage tiers. 
          Increases to CARE rates are currently restricted to on annual 
          increases in the CalWORKS program. The CARE program is funded 
          through a rate surcharge paid by all other utility customers.

          The California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) currently has 
          an open proceeding regarding the CARE program which is 
          explicitly considering requirements for CARE customers that are 
          using more than 600% of the baseline usage.

          Proposed Law: This bill would allow an IOU to require of any 
          CARE customer who use more than 400% of the baseline usage  in a 
          monthly billing cycle: (1) proof of income eligibility, 
          regardless of how the customer was enrolled in the program; (2) 
          participation in an energy savings assistance program to inform 
          and assist the customer in lowering their energy usage; and (3) 
          identification of the landlord of the property, if the customer 








          SB 1207 (Fulller)
          Page 1


          is a renter, in order to share recommendations to the landlord. 
          The IOU may condition the customer's continued participation in 
          the CARE program to the customer's agreement to participate in 
          the energy savings assistance program. 

          This bill would further require an IOU to obligate a CARE 
          customer using 600% of the baseline usage to participate in an 
          energy savings assistance program as a condition of remaining in 
          the program. If the customer's usage continues to exceed 600% of 
          baseline usage despite participation in the energy savings 
          assistance program, the IOU would be allowed to remove the 
          customer from the CARE program in a manner consistent with 
          procedures adopted by the PUC.

          Staff Comments: This bill would require the PUC to open a 
          proceeding to develop procedures by which an IOU can remove a 
          customer from the CARE program for persistent electricity or gas 
          usage exceeding 600% of the baseline usage. Although not 
          explicitly required in the bill, presumably the proceeding will 
          take into consideration the duration of the high usage before 
          IOUs take actions against a customer; situations where the 
          customer has little or no control over items that dramatically 
          increase load such as inefficient HVAC systems, high heat 
          storms, or multiple families living in one unit; and other 
          consumer protections not specified in this bill. 

          On May 4, 2012, the PUC issued a proposed decision (PD) that 
          likely meets the requirements of this bill. If the PUC adopts 
          the PD as recently drafted, there will be no costs associated 
          with this bill, as the bill would have no practical effect. 
          However, if the PD is substantially changed before it is adopted 
          by the PUC, the PUC could be required to open a new proceeding 
          as a result of the passage of this bill at an approximate 
          one-time cost of $150,000. 

          Proposed Author Amendments: Technical changes to conform 
          requirements to existing practices and to not constrain the PUC 
          in developing procedures to implement this bill, presumably to 
          accommodate the recently released proposed decision.