BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1210
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 1210 (Lieu)
          As Amended  August 20, 2012
          2/3 vote

           SENATE VOTE  :38-0  
           
           PUBLIC SAFETY       6-0         APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
          
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Ammiano, Knight, Cedillo, |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey,            |
          |     |Hagman, Mitchell, Hall    |     |Blumenfield, Bradford,    |
          |     |                          |     |Charles Calderon, Campos, |
          |     |                          |     |Davis, Donnelly, Fuentes, |
          |     |                          |     |Hall, Hill, Cedillo,      |
          |     |                          |     |Mitchell, Nielsen, Norby, |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Wagner           |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the court to assess a post-release community 
          supervision (PRCS) or mandatory-supervision revocation fine in 
          the same amount as that imposed for the restitution fine and 
          authorizes local agencies to collect them.  Specifically,  this 
          bill  :  

          1)Requires the court to assess a PRCS-revocation fine or a 
            mandatory-supervision revocation fine in the same amount as 
            that imposed for the restitution fine.

          2)States that the PRCS-revocation fine and mandatory-supervision 
            revocation fines are suspended unless the terms of PRCS or 
            mandatory supervision are violated and the defendant is 
            incarcerated in the county jail for that violation.

          3)Provides that the PRCS-revocation fine and the 
            mandatory-supervision revocation fine are not subject to 
            penalty assessments.

          4)Specifies that the fine money shall be deposited in the 
            restitution fund.

          5)Provides that any part of a restitution fine that remains 
            unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on PRCS or 
            mandatory supervision is enforceable by the California Victims 








                                                                  SB 1210
                                                                  Page  2


            Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB).

          6)Provides that any part of a restitution order that remains 
            unsatisfied after a defendant is no longer on PRCS or 
            mandatory supervision is enforceable by the victim.

          7)States that local collection programs may continue to enforce 
            victim restitution orders once a defendant is no longer on 
            probation, PRCS, or mandatory supervision.

          8)Specifies that the period for enforcement of judgments found 
            in Civil Procedure Code Sections 683.010 et seq. does not 
            apply to court-ordered fines, forfeitures, penalties, fees, or 
            assessments.

          9)Provides that if the board of supervisors chooses to designate 
            the county sheriff as the collecting agency, it must first 
            obtain the concurrence of the county sheriff.

          10)Authorizes the agency designated by the board of supervisors 
            in the county of incarceration to deduct 20% to 50% from the 
            wages and trust account deposits of a county-jail inmate 
            serving a sentence under realignment and owing a restitution 
            fine, and to transfer that amount to the VCGCB for deposit in 
            the restitution fund.  

          11)Authorizes the agency designated by the board of supervisors 
            in the county of incarceration to deduct 20% to 50% from the 
            wages and trust account deposits of a county-jail inmate 
            serving a sentence under realignment and owing a victim 
            restitution order, and to transfer that amount to the VCGCB 
            for payment to the victim or to pay the victim directly.  

          12)Requires that the sentencing court be provided a record of 
            payments made to the crime victim and to the restitution fund.

          13)Allows the agency designated by the board of supervisors in 
            the county of incarceration to withhold an administrative fee 
            to be held in a special deposit account for the purposes of 
            reimbursing administrative and support costs of the 
            restitution program, as specified.

          14)Directs the local agency designated by the board of 
            supervisors to collect the restitution order first when a 








                                                                  SB 1210
                                                                  Page  3


            county-jail inmate serving a sentence under realignment owes 
            both a restitution fine and a restitution order.

          15)Allows the garnishment of any compensatory or punitive 
            damages awarded to an defendant placed on PRCS or on mandatory 
            supervision in connection with a civil action brought against 
            any federal, state, or local jail or prison to satisfy 
            outstanding restitution orders or fines.

          16)Allows a victim who does not timely provide a current address 
            to the VCGCB to provide documentation to the local agency 
            designated by the board of supervisors which in turn may 
            verify that money was in fact collected by VCGCB on the 
            victim's behalf.  Upon receipt of verified information, the 
            VCGCB shall transmit restitution revenues to the victim. 

          17)States that juvenile court orders regarding fines, penalties, 
            bail, forfeiture, and victim restitution, can now be referred 
            to the Franchise Tax Board for collection.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations 
          Committee:

          1)No state cost.

          2)Unknown significant increase, in the millions of dollars, to 
            the state Restitution Fund to the extent local administration 
            and collection efforts are successful.  Assuming local 
            administration and collection efforts are moderately 
            successful, Restitution Fund revenue should remain relatively 
            consistent with recent levels.   

          3)Unknown, potentially significant, nonreimbursable costs to 
            local governments - likely county sheriff offices - for 
            additional workload to create and administer collection 
            efforts.  Several county sheriff offices have expressed 
            reservations regarding workload that may exceed the allowed 
            administrative deductions from inmate funds.  While this bill 
            only authorizes such collection efforts, should county boards 
            task sheriffs' offices with these responsibilities, sheriffs 
            would presumably bear any costs that exceed administrative 
            deductions. 

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Last year, AB 109 realigned 








                                                                  SB 1210
                                                                  Page  4


          public safety services in California.  As part of the 
          Realignment plan thousands of convicted felons are no longer 
          being sent to the California Department of Corrections and 
          Rehabilitation (CDCR), instead they are being housed in local 
          jails.  Unfortunately, the Realignment plan failed to give 
          counties the authority to collect restitution for victims from 
          these convicted felons.  

          "SB 1210 corrects this oversight by providing counties with the 
          authority to collect restitution from these offenders in order 
          to help the victims of their crimes receive the restitution they 
          are rightfully due."

          Please see the policy committee analysis for a full discussion 
          of this bill.  


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Sandy Uribe / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744 


                                                                FN: 0005119