BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                      



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  SB 1289|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 1289
          Author:   Corbett (D)
          Amended:  8/13/12
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  7-1, 3/28/12
          AYES:  Lowenthal, Alquist, Hancock, Liu, Price, Simitian, 
            Vargas
          NOES:  Huff
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner, Blakeslee, Vacancy

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

          SENATE FLOOR  :  25-11, 5/10/12
          AYES:  Alquist, Blakeslee, Calderon, Corbett, Correa, De 
            León, DeSaulnier, Evans, Hancock, Hernandez, Kehoe, Leno, 
            Lieu, Liu, Lowenthal, Negrete McLeod, Padilla, Pavley, 
            Price, Rubio, Simitian, Steinberg, Vargas, Wolk, Wright
          NOES:  Anderson, Berryhill, Dutton, Emmerson, Fuller, 
            Gaines, Harman, Huff, La Malfa, Strickland, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cannella, Runner, Wyland, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-26, 8/21/12 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Postsecondary education:  private student loans

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires private or independent 
          postsecondary educational institutions, the California 
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          2

          State University (CSU), and the University of California 
          (UC) if the UC Regents concur, to provide specified 
          information to students regarding federal and private 
          student loans.

           Assembly Amendments  streamlined required information to 
          accompany the repayment options.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides, under federal law, for 
          several types of federal student loans through the William 
          D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, administered by the 
          Federal Student Aid Office within the United States 
          Department of Education (USDE), including:

          1.  Subsidized Stafford Loans  .  These are needs-based loans 
            that cover the difference between a student's resources 
            and the cost of attending a college or university, the 
            amount of loan is dependent on the level of need, 
            dependent status, and year in college.  The federal 
            government pays the interest while the student is 
            attending the college or university and subsidizes the 
            interest throughout the life of the loan.  

          2.  Unsubsidized Stafford Loans  .  Not based on financial 
            need, these loans generally cover the difference between 
            the subsidized Stafford Loan and the total cost of 
            attending college.  Loans are made by private lending 
            institutions and repayment is guaranteed by the federal 
            government.  The federal government sets the interest 
            rates and fees. 

          3.PLUS (Parent Loans for Undergraduate Students) are 
            available to creditworthy parents of dependent students.  
            These are not needs-based and are federally guaranteed.  
            In addition, these types of loans have been expanded for 
            graduate or professional degree students.  The borrower 
            is responsible for paying the interest on PLUS loans 
            during all periods, starting from the date the loan is 
            first disbursed.

          This bill requires public, private or independent 
          postsecondary educational institutions except the CCC to 
          provide information, as specified, to students regarding 
          student loans.  Specifically, this bill: 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          3


          1. Requires all public, private or independent 
             postsecondary educational institutions, except the CCC 
             to state in all printed and online financial aid 
             materials distributed by the institution to applicants 
             for admission or matriculated students and on private 
             loan applications provided or made available by the 
             institution all of the following:

              A.    Federal student loans are required by law to 
                provide a range of flexible repayment options, 
                including, but not limited to, income-based repayment 
                and income-contingent repayment plans, and loan 
                forgiveness benefits, which other student loans are 
                not required to provide.

              B.    Federal direct loans are available to students 
                regardless of income.

               The institution may continue to use financial aid 
               materials that are printed before January 1, 2013, if 
               the institution includes an insert with the printed 
               material that provides the information required.  All 
               financial aid materials printed on or after January 1, 
               2013, shall include the information required above.

          2. Requires institutions to clearly distinguish private 
             loans from federal loans in individual financial aid 
             awards by stating, for any private loans offered by the 
             institution as a part of the institution's award 
             package, all of the following:

              A.    Whether the rate is fixed or variable.

              B.    An explanation that private student loan lenders 
                can offer variable interest rates that can increase 
                or decrease over time, depending on market 
                conditions.

              C.    An explanation that private student loans have a 
                range of interest rates and fees and students should 
                determine the interest rate of, and any fees 
                associated with, the private student loan included in 
                their financial aid award package before accepting 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          4

                the loan.

              D.    An explanation that students should contact the 
                lender of the private student loan or their 
                postsecondary educational institution's financial aid 
                office if they have any questions about a private 
                student loan.

          3. Requires institutions for any private loan lender list 
             provided, it also shall provide general information 
             about the loans available through the lender and 
             disclose the basis for each lender's inclusion on the 
             list.  The institution shall also disclose with the list 
             that the student has the ability to choose any lender.

          4. Provides that all of the aforementioned applies to the 
             University of California only to the extent that the 
             Board of Regents acts, by resolution, to make it 
             applicable.

          5. CCC may, and are requested to comply with stated 
             provisions of this bill.

           Comments
           
           California Data and National Trends  .  According to data 
          from the Project on Student Debt, students who graduated 
          from public and private non-profit four-year universities 
          in California in 2010 had an average of $17,326 in student 
          debt.  However, that data is limited because it doesn't 
          include any for-profit institutions, some nonprofit 
          colleges did not report their student debt data, and the 
          data looks only at graduates - not counting students who 
          take out student loans and never earn a degree.

          More broadly, the College Board's Trends in Student Aid 
          2011 estimates that in 2009-10, nationwide about 55 percent 
          of public four-year college students who graduated from the 
          institutions at which they began their studies graduated 
          with debt.  They had borrowed an average of $22,000. About 
          two-thirds of those earning bachelor's degrees from private 
          nonprofit institutions had debt averaging $28,100.  

          While federal loans make up the majority of student loan 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                              SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          5

          borrowing, there are limits to how much money students can 
          borrow under federal loan programs; the remaining "unmet 
          need" to cover total educational expenses are often 
          financed through private loans.  These private loans often 
          carry higher interest rates and less favorable terms than 
          government loans.  For example, federal loans have fixed 
          rates with set caps, limits on origination fees, and 
          flexible repayment options.  In contrast, private loans are 
          more likely to have higher variable rates, no caps on 
          origination fees, and strict repayment rules with few 
          options for distressed borrowers.

          The Federal Reserve of San Francisco's Student Debt and 
          Default in the 12th District, indicates the share of 
          private loans increased rapidly from 2000 through 2007, 
          consistent with the broader trends of easy credit during 
          the housing boom.  At their peak, private loans made up 26 
          percent of the total student loans in the 20062007 academic 
          year, for a total of $22.6 billion.  Students whose parents 
          earned less than $36,000 accessed private loans at roughly 
          the same rate as students whose parents earned more than 
          $105,000 for the 20072008 school year. Private loan 
          activity began to diminish in 2008, consistent with tighter 
          credit conditions across all sectors, but they still 
          accounted for $7.9 billion in 20102011.  The recent 
          difficulties facing credit markets in general, combined 
          with increases in the availability of federal student loans 
          are reflected in diminished use of private education loans. 
          There is no reliable source for exact information on total 
          borrowing from these sources.

           Federal law, HR 4137  .  The federal government in 2008 
          enacted the Higher Education Opportunity Act with the 
          intent of improved disclosures for private education loans. 
           HR 4137 amended the federal Higher Education Act of 1965 
          to prohibit private education loans from being consummated 
          before applicants submit a signed self-certification form 
          that institutions of higher education provide to students, 
          informing applicants of the availability of, and their 
          possible eligibility for federal, state, and institutional 
          student aid.   The form's purpose is to ensure an applicant 
          does not borrow more than needed.  Information required to 
          complete this form includes total cost of attendance 
          (including tuition, fees, room & board, etc.); estimated 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          6

          amount of financial aid; and the difference between the 
          total cost and estimated financial aid.  Borrowers need to 
          submit the self-certification prior to receiving a private 
          or direct student loan.

           Prior Legislation
           
          SB 1355, Corbett (2008) was very similar to this bill.  The 
          bill was vetoed by then Governor Schwarzenegger with the 
          following veto message:

            "?recently enacted federal legislation (H.R. 4137) 
            makes changes to the Federal Family Education Loan 
            program, requiring more comprehensive lender 
            disclosures and consumer education of students and 
            families than this bill, particularly as budgeting and 
            financial management relates to student loan programs.  
            The federal legislation also imposes new restrictions 
            on private lenders and education institutions in order 
            to address concerns related to unfair lending practices 
            and conflicts of interest.  Therefore, given the 
            comprehensive nature of the federal reforms recently 
            enacted, I am unable to sign this bill at this time." 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes   
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/21/12)

          American Federation of State, County and Municipal 
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          Associated Students of the University of California, Davis
          California Faculty Association
          California Student Aid Commission
          Consumer Federation of California
          Institute for College Access and Success
          Public Advocates, Inc.
          Western Association for College Admissions Counseling

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/21/12)

          California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office, 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          7

          the growing cost of higher education, especially during 
          tough economic times, means that more students will rely on 
          student loans to pay for tuition and other necessities 
          while in school.  Unfortunately family incomes and student 
          aid programs have not increased at the same pace, requiring 
          students to take on larger amounts of debt.  By providing 
          students with information regarding loan options and risks, 
          as proposed in this measure, students can make informed 
          qualitative decisions about student loans, reducing the 
          likelihood they will run into additional unforeseen 
          consequences.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    Opponents argue that this bill 
          on the grounds that existing federal law already covers the 
          proposed area of legislation.  The current combination of 
          Truth in Lending Act requires disclosures and the USDE 
          financial student aid regulations disclosures apply to 
          private loans made by a private or public postsecondary 
          institution.   
           

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 50-26, 08/21/12
          AYES: Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Beall, Block, 
            Blumenfield, Bonilla, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, 
            Butler, Charles Calderon, Campos, Carter, Cedillo, 
            Chesbro, Davis, Dickinson, Eng, Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, 
            Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Gordon, Hayashi, Hill, Huber, 
            Hueso, Huffman, Lara, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, 
            Mitchell, Monning, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, 
            Portantino, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, 
            Wieckowski, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez
          NOES: Achadjian, Bill Berryhill, Conway, Cook, Donnelly, 
            Beth Gaines, Garrick, Gorell, Grove, Hagman, Halderman, 
            Harkey, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Mansoor, Miller, 
            Morrell, Nestande, Nielsen, Norby, Olsen, Silva, Smyth, 
            Wagner
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Fletcher, Hall, Roger Hernández, Valadao


          PQ:RJG:dn  8/21/12   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               SB 1289
                                                                Page 
          8














































                                                           CONTINUED