BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  SB 1299
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 8, 2012

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                    SB 1299 (Wright) - As Amended:  June 12, 2012 

          Policy Committee:                             Public 
          SafetyVote:4-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program: 
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill makes a series of relatively minor changes to the 
          process by which crime victims seek reimbursement from the 
          California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board 
          (board) for financial losses resulting from a crime. 
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Extends the time period in which a victim may file a claim 
            from one year to three years from the date of the crime, from 
            the date the victim becomes 18 years old, or from the time the 
            victim knew or could have discovered that an injury or death 
            had been sustained as a result of the crime, whichever is 
            later.  

          2)Requires the board, when determining whether to grant a filing 
            extension, to consider whether or not the victim incurs 
            emotional harm or financial loss while testifying during the 
            prosecution or in the punishment of the person accused or 
            convicted of the crime, or when the person convicted of the 
            crime is scheduled for a parole hearing or released from 
            incarceration.

          3)Specifies that reimbursement for a claim may be made beyond 
            three years after the expense was incurred by the victim if 
            the victim has paid the expense as a direct result of a crime 
            for which an application has been filed and approved.

          4)States that any reduction in maximum rates or service 
            limitations shall not affect payment or reimbursement incurred 
            prior to three months after the adoption of any new 
            regulations.








                                                                  SB 1299
                                                                  Page  2


          5)Prohibits a provider from charging a victim for any difference 
            between the cost of a service provided to a victim and the 
            program's payment for that service.

          6)Adds county social workers to the list of people authorized to 
            file a claim with the board on behalf of a victim if the 
            victim is a child abuse victim or an elder abuse victim, and 
            that victim is unable to file on his or her own behalf.

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          1)Extending the claim-filing period from one to three years will 
            increase crime victim payments by several hundred thousands of 
            dollars (Restitution Fund). According to the board, 150 
            applications per year are denied for late filing after one 
            year, but before three years. An approved application averages 
            about $2,500, which means a two-year extension could result in 
            additional claim costs in the $375,000 range. The board 
            indicates this amount is absorbable, as claim payments 
            fluctuate by several million dollars per year.  

          2)Minor administrative costs/savings as a result of extending 
            the filing period, which would eliminate the need to consider 
            good cause extensions.    

           COMMENTS  

           Rationale  . 

          The author's intent is to streamline the application process and 
          make it more victim-friendly. The bill was developed in 
          conjunction with victims' groups and service providers. The 
          board, while absent a formal support position, indicates the 
          changes are workable and the costs absorbable.   

          According to the author, "While California has the largest 
          victim compensation program in the nation it also has the least 
          'user friendly' system for victims. Victims and their services 
          providers often turn away from the program unnecessarily because 
          of their confusion over the complexity of the rules, lack of 
          timely payment, and misconceptions put forth by staff that can't 
          be trained fast enough to deal with the many regulatory and 
          policy changes. The Auditor General's 2008 report and subsequent 
          status updates support changes in the program, as well as the 








                                                                  SB 1299
                                                                  Page  3

          2009 Assembly Committee on Accountability and Administrative 
          Review."


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081