BILL ANALYSIS Ó
SB 1496
Page 1
Date of Hearing: August 8, 2012
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Felipe Fuentes, Chair
SB 1496 (Simitian) - As Amended: May 25, 2012
Policy Committee: Natural
ResourcesVote:6-2
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to
conduct, update and publish specified assessments of liquefied
natural gas (LNG) and requires specific analysis be included in
an environmental impact report (EIR) for an onshore or offshore
LNG terminal in California.
FISCAL EFFECT
CEC reports cost to implement this bill would be minor and
absorbable because the bill codifies existing reporting
activities. However, because the bill requires those reporting
activities, this analysis attributes the minor cost of those
reporting activities to the bill. In any case, CEC expect costs
to be minor and absorbable.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author asserts that decisions regarding the
importation and exportation of liquefied natural gas should be
based on a comprehensive review of current and projected
natural gas supply and demand in California, alternatives to
natural gas importation and exportation and the environmental
effects of importation and exportation.
2)Background. LNG is natural gas in a liquid form. When natural
gas is cooled to minus 259 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 161
degrees Celsius), it becomes a clear, colorless, odorless
liquid. LNG is neither corrosive nor toxic. According to the
U.S. Energy Information Agency, the United States, including
California, needs to consider developing additional supplies
SB 1496
Page 2
of natural gas to meet its growing demand. Because existing
North American supply basins are maturing, the U.S. will need
to rely more on new supplies including liquefied natural gas
and unconventional sources of natural gas such as shale and
coal bed methane.
California already imports 85 % of its natural gas supply from
these basins. Currently, the United States has five
LNG-receiving and regasification terminals, including one in
Puerto Rico, but no terminal is located on the West Coast.
Recently, however, a number of companies have proposed to
build LNG import facilities in California, at other locations
in the United States, and in Baja California, Mexico.
3)There is no support for or opposition to this bill.
Analysis Prepared by : Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081