BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 13
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 1, 2013

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                  Mike Gatto, Chair

            AB 13 (Chavez and Quirk-Silva) - As Amended:  March 11, 2013 

          Policy Committee:                              Higher  
          EducationVote:13-0
                        Veterans Affairs                      10-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  


          This bill deletes the requirement that a student who served in  
          the Armed Forces must have been stationed in California at least  
          one year immediately prior to receiving an honorable discharge  
          in order to be exempt from paying non-resident tuition at the  
          California Community Colleges (CCC), the California State  
          University (CSU), and the University of California (UC).


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          The bill will result in revenue losses to each of the segments.

           1)UC  enrolled 958 undergraduate veterans in 2011-12. UC  
            indicates that 27 of these student veterans paid non-resident  
            tuition. The additional cost of non-resident tuition for these  
            students is $22,878. In the first year after this bill is  
            enacted, these students would be eligible for in-state  
            tuition, yielding a revenue loss of $617,000. Thereafter, it  
            is assumed that each cohort of first-year students would  
            benefit from this bill. Assuming five first-year students each  
            year, the annual revenue loss would be $115,000. Regarding  
            graduate students, UC indicates that 61 of 245 student  
            veterans paid non-resident tuition in 2011-12, at an  
            additional cost of between $12,245 and $15,102. Revenue losses  
            associated with these students would be between $747,000 and  
            $921,000 in the first year, and assuming 20 new qualifying  
            graduate students annually, would be $245,000 to $302,000 in  
            subsequent years. 








                                                                  AB 13
                                                                  Page  2


           2)CSU  enrolled 6,938 veterans in fall 2012. The additional cost  
            of non-resident tuition at CSU is $11,160. CSU indicates that  
            92 veterans were paying non-resident tuition. In the first  
            year after this bill is enacted, these students would be  
            eligible for in-state tuition, yielding a revenue loss of $1  
            million. Thereafter, it is assumed that each cohort of  
            first-year students would benefit from this bill. Assuming 18  
            first-year students each year, the annual revenue loss would  
            be around $200,000.

          3)The  CCC  enrolled about 44,700 veterans in 2010-11. The  
            difference between resident and non-resident fees at the CCC  
            is $144 per unit. For a full-time student (30 units in an  
            academic year) the additional fee revenue to the CCC is  
            $4,000. The number of these veterans currently paying  
            non-resident fees is unknown, but is believed to be quite low.  
            For every 100 full-time equivalent non-resident student  
            veterans who are able to benefit from this bill, the annual  
            revenue loss would be $432,000.

            The assumptions above are probably low, as this benefit would,  
            over time, attract more non-resident veterans to California's  
            public colleges and universities. According to the author, 19  
            other states have a similar policy. Federal legislation has  
            been introduced in both the House and the Senate to require  
            institutions that are eligible for Post 9/11 G.I. Bill  
            benefits to charge any veteran the resident tuition rate.

           COMMENTS  

           1)Background  . Current law establishes the requirements for  
            determining residency in order to qualify for paying the  
            lower-cost in-state tuition and student fees at UC, CSU, and  
            CCC. To qualify for the California resident fees, students are  
            generally required to have resided in the state for more than  
            one year immediately preceding the residence determination  
            date and undertake other specified actions such as registering  
            to vote or registering one's car in California. 

            The Post 9/11 GI Bill will only pay the resident tuition cost  
            for a student, thus to use this benefit, out-of-state student  
            veterans are currently faced with the choice of waiting to  
            establish residency before enrolling in school or finding  
            another source of funds (including from out of pocket) to  








                                                                  AB 13
                                                                  Page  3

            cover the difference between resident and non-resident  
            tuition. Current law does allow students who were on active  
            duty in California for at least one year immediately prior to  
            their discharge to pay in-state tuition and fees. In order to  
            receive this benefit, CCC students must file an affidavit with  
            their community college stating their intent to establish  
            California residency as soon as possible.

           2)Purpose  . According to the author, the difference between  
            resident and nonresident tuition is a significant financial  
            barrier for veterans from other states who wish to attend a  
            California public institution directly after discharge and  
            before they have had the opportunity to establish residency. 

           3)Prior Legislation  . Two similar bills-AB 2250 (Gaines) of 2012  
            and AB 2472 (Wyland) of 2006-were both held on this  
            committee's Suspense File.

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081