AB 25, as amended, Campos. Employment: social media.
Existing law prohibits a private employer from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to disclose a username or password for the purpose of accessing personal social media, to access personal social media in the presence of the employer, or to divulge any personal social media. Existing law prohibits a private employer from discharging, disciplining, threatening to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliating against an employee or applicant for not complying with a request or demand that violates these provisions.
This bill would apply the provisions described above to public employers. The bill would state that its provisions address a matter of statewide interest and apply to public employers generally, including charter cities and counties.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
Section 980 of the Labor Code is amended to
2read:
(a) As used in this chapter:
2(1) “Employer” means a private employer or a public employer.
3begin insert For purposes of this chapter, “public employer” means the state,
4a city, a county, or a district.end insert
5 (2) “Social media” means an electronic service or account, or
6electronic content, including, but not limited to, videos, still
7photographs, blogs, video blogs, podcasts, instant and text
8messages,begin delete email,end deletebegin insert
e-mail,end insert online services or accounts, or Internet
9Web site profiles or locations.
10(b) An employer shall not require or request an employee or
11applicant for employment to do any of the following:
12(1) Disclose a username or password for the purpose of
13accessing personal social media.
14(2) Access personal social media in the presence of the
15employer.
16(3) Divulge any personal social media, except as provided in
17subdivision (c).
18(c) Nothing in this section shall affect an employer’s existing
19rights and obligations to request an employee to divulge personal
20social media reasonably
believed to be relevant to an investigation
21of allegations of employee misconduct or employee violation of
22applicable laws and regulations, provided that the social media is
23used solely for purposes of that investigation or a related
24proceeding.
25(d) Nothing in this section precludes an employer from requiring
26or requesting an employee to disclose a username, password, or
27other method for the purpose of accessing an employer-issued
28electronic device.
29(e) An employer shall not discharge, discipline, threaten to
30discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliate against an employee
31or applicant for not complying with a request or demand by the
32employer that violates this section. However, this section does not
33prohibit an employer from terminating or otherwise taking an
34adverse
action against an employee or applicant if otherwise
35permitted by law.
Because of the crucial privacy rights at issue and the
37growing abuse of those rights, the Legislature finds and declares
P3 1that this act addresses a matter of statewide interest and applies to
2public employers generally, including charter cities and counties.
O
98