BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 26
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   August 13, 2014

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT
                               Roger Hernández, Chair
                     AB 26 (Bonilla) - As Amended:  June 16, 2014
           
          SUBJECT  :   Construction: prevailing wage.

           SUMMARY  : Clarifies that the definition of "construction" for  
          purposes of public works projects also includes work performed  
          during the postconstruction phases of construction, including,  
          but not limited to, all cleanup work at the jobsite.

           EXISTING LAW  defines the term "public works" to include, among  
          other things, construction, alteration, demolition, installation  
          or repair work done under contract and paid for in whole or in  
          part out of public funds.  "Construction" also includes work  
          performed during the design and preconstruction phases of  
          construction, including, but not limited to, inspection and land  
          surveying work.

           FISCAL EFFECT  : According to the Senate Appropriations Committee,  
          pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

           COMMENTS  :  A 2009 decision by the director of the Department of  
          Industrial Relations (DIR) regarding whether or not clean-up  
          work was part of the construction project and therefore subject  
          to the prevailing wage payment appears indicates that DIR has  
          deemed this work as part of the project and therefore subject to  
          prevailing wage.  (Harbor Construction Co., Inc. vs. Antelope  
          Valley Union High School District, Case No: 09-0095-CPR)  In the  
          decision, the director of DIR stated that, "Contrary to Harbor's  
          argument, the janitorial exception to maintenance work has no  
          applicability where the root obligation to pay prevailing wages  
          is found in section 1772, and 1774.  The janitorial exception  
          only applies to contracts let solely for maintenance work and  
          not to cleaning work performed as a requirement of a broader  
          public works contract." 

          Although the director's interpretation of the applicability of  
          prevailing wage requirements on clean-up work at a public works  
          project seems to address the ambiguity, there needs to be  
          clarity in the Labor Code to ensure consistency in its  
          applicability.  This bill would clarify that, for purposes of  
          public works projects, "construction" work also includes work  








                                                                  AB 26
                                                                  Page  2

          performed during the postconstruction phases of construction,  
          including, but not limited to, all cleanup work at the jobsite.   

               
          According to the author, prevailing wage laws were enacted to  
          ensure skilled construction workers on public works projects are  
          paid at least the wages and benefits that prevail in their local  
          communities.  Unfortunately, proponents argue, this bill is  
          necessary to address a problem that has persisted on public  
          works projects that has allowed dishonest contractors to  
          side-step prevailing wage law when it comes to the final  
          clean-up work on a public works project.  The author argues that  
          while the general prevailing wage determination includes "all  
          final cleanup of debris, grounds, and buildings near the  
          completion of the project," state law does not specify that this  
          work is included within the definition of "public works."   
          According to the author, the lack of clarity has resulted in  
          some public works employees performing cleanup work but not  
          receiving a prevailing wage for that work. 

          Further, the author contends that the discrepancy in pay  
          compromises the quality of projects and restricts workers'  
          ability to enter the middle-class.  Additionally, proponents  
          argue that the lack of conformity makes it difficult for  
          contractors who pay prevailing wages to submit competitive bids  
          for public works projects.  This bill seeks to remedy this issue  
          by including work performed during the postconstruction phases  
          of construction, including, but not limited to, all cleanup work  
          at a jobsite within the definition of "public works."

          There is no opposition on file.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California State Council of Laborers (sponsor) 
          California Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
          California School Employees Association 
          Southern California Contractors Association 
          State Building and Construction Trades Council
          United Contractors 

           Opposition 
           








                                                                  AB 26
                                                                  Page  3

          None on file.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091