BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                  AB 7
                                                                  Page 1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 7 (Wieckowski)
          As Amended  May 28, 2013
          Majority vote 

           NATURAL RESOURCES   7-0         APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Grove, Bigelow, Garcia,   |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow,   |
          |     |Muratsuchi, Patterson,    |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Stone, Williams           |     |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
          |     |                          |     |Gomez, Hall, Ammiano,     |
          |     |                          |     |Linder, Pan, Quirk,       |
          |     |                          |     |Wagner, Weber             |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the owner or operator of an oil and gas well  
          on which hydraulic fracturing is performed to provide the  
          Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR)  
          information related to the hydraulic fracturing and requires  
          DOGGR, to the extent that the information is not a trade secret,  
          to make the information available to the public.  Specifically,  
           this bill:
           
          1)Requires the owner or operator of an oil and gas well on which  
            hydraulic fracturing is performed to provide DOGGR with all of  
            the following information: 

             a)   A complete list of the chemical constituents formulated  
               for use in the hydraulic fracturing fluid that is injected  
               into the well and each chemical's associated chemical  
               abstracts service (CAS) numbers.  Where the CAS number does  
               not exist, the operator or supplier may provide another  
               unique identifier where available;

             b)   The purpose of each additive contained in the hydraulic  
               fracturing fluid;

             c)   The estimated total amount of the additives in the  
               hydraulic fracturing fluid;

             d)   The estimated maximum concentration of each chemical  
               constituent in the additive as disclosed on a material  








                                                                  AB 7
                                                                  Page 2


               safety data sheet in the hydraulic fracturing fluid  
               expressed as a percentage by mass;

             e)   The estimated maximum concentration of each chemical  
               constituent disclosed on a material safety data sheet in  
               the hydraulic fracturing fluid, expressed as a percentage  
               by mass;

             f)   The amount and source of any water suitable for  
               irrigation or domestic purposes used to conduct the  
               hydraulic fracturing treatment of the well;

             g)   The amount and disposition of water and hydraulic  
               fracturing fluid recovered from each well where hydraulic  
               fracturing occurred; and,

             h)   Any radiological components or tracers injected into the  
               well as part of the hydraulic fracturing process and a  
               description of the recovery method, if any, for those  
               components or tracers, the recovery rate, and the disposal  
               method for recovered components or tracers.

          2)Requires DOGGR to make hydraulic fracturing information  
            provided by an owner or operator of a well available to the  
            public in a way that the information is associated with each  
            specific well where chemicals are injected for purposes of  
            hydraulic fracturing.  For purposes of complying with this  
            requirement, DOGGR may use an Internet Web site administered  
            by the Ground Water Protection Council or the Interstate Oil  
            and Gas Compact Commission (such as fracfocus.org) if certain  
            specified standards are met.

          3)Requires, on or before January 1, 2015, DOGGR, in consultation  
            with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and  
            the Department of Toxic Substances Control, to establish a  
            process through which all chemicals used in hydraulic  
            fracturing treatments may be studied or reviewed, a list  
            containing any restricted or prohibited toxic chemicals, and a  
            list containing any restricted or prohibited locations deemed  
            extremely vulnerable to a spill or release of chemicals.

          4)Extends DOGGR's permit review period for an application to  
            commence oil and gas drilling from 10 working days to 30  
            working days.








                                                                  AB 7
                                                                  Page 3



          5)Requires an application to commence oil and gas drilling to  
            include information related to the type of exploration and  
            production techniques that will be used at the well and a  
            complete list of chemicals, if any, that will be injected into  
            the well for hydraulic fracturing or other production  
            enhancement methods in the exploration or production process.

          6)Provides trade secret protection for the chemical composition  
            of additives pursuant to Section 1060 of the Evidence Code or  
            the Uniform Trade Secrets Act.

          7)Requires DOGGR to prepare and transmit to the Legislature a  
            comprehensive annual report regarding hydraulic fracturing in  
            oil and gas exploration and production in California.  

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Requires DOGGR to supervise the drilling, operation,  
            maintenance, and abandonment of wells and the operation,  
            maintenance, and removal or abandonment of tanks and  
            facilities attendant to oil and gas production, including  
            certain pipelines that are within an oil and gas field, so as  
            to prevent, as far as possible, damage to life, health,  
            property, and natural resources; damage to underground oil and  
            gas deposits from infiltrating water and other causes; loss of  
            oil, gas, or reservoir energy, and damage to underground and  
            surface waters suitable for irrigation or domestic purposes by  
            the infiltration of, or the addition of, detrimental  
            substances.

          2)Requires the operator of any well, before commencing the work  
            of drilling the well, to file with DOGGR a written notice of  
            intention to commence drilling.  Drilling shall not commence  
            until approval is given by DOGGR.  If DOGGR fails to give the  
            operator written response to the notice within 10 working days  
            from the date of receipt, that failure shall be considered as  
            an approval of the notice. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, estimated costs in the $1 million one-time and $1  
          million on-going range to fulfill new duties at DOGGR relating  
          to evaluating trade secrets and processes public requests on  
          trade secrets.








                                                                  AB 7
                                                                  Page 4



           COMMENTS  :  
           
          Purpose  .  This bill is primarily intended to provide the public  
          disclosure of information relating to hydraulic fracturing.

           Background  .  Hydraulic fracturing (also known as fracking) is  
          one energy production technique used to obtain oil and natural  
          gas in areas where those energy supplies are trapped in rock  
          (i.e., shale) or sand formations.  

          Once an oil or natural gas well is drilled and properly lined  
          with steel casing, fluids are pumped down to an isolated portion  
          of the well at pressures high enough to cause cracks in shale  
          formations below the earth's surface.  These cracks or fractures  
          allow oil and natural gas to flow more freely.  Often, a  
          propping agent such as sand is pumped into the well to keep  
          fractures open.

          In many instances, the fluids used in hydraulic fracturing are  
          water-based.  There are some formations, however, that are not  
          fractured effectively by water-based fluids because clay or  
          other substances in the rock absorb water.  For these  
          formations, complex mixtures with a multitude of chemical  
          additives may be used to thicken or thin the fluids, improve the  
          flow of the fluid, or even kill bacteria that can reduce  
          fracturing performance.

           Federal Exemption Followed by Fracking Increase  .  In 2005,  
          Congress exempted hydraulic fracturing (except when involving  
          the injection of diesel fuels) from the federal Safe Drinking  
          Water Act.  As a result of this action, the United States  
          Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) lacks the authority to  
          regulate hydraulic fracturing activities that do not use diesel  
          fuel as an additive.  Since 2007, shale oil production has  
          increased from about 39 barrels to 217 million barrels and shale  
          gas production increased from 1.6 trillion cubic feet to 7.2  
          trillion cubic feet.

           Potential Environmental Risks  .  The United States Government  
          Accountability Office (GAO) categorizes the potential  
          environmental risks of fracking into the following categories:   
          a) air quality; b) water quality and quantity; c) land and  
          wildlife.








                                                                  AB 7
                                                                  Page 5



          Air quality risks are generally a result of engine exhaust from  
          increased traffic and equipment emissions with a risk of  
          unintentional emissions of pollutants from faulty equipment.

          Water quality risks result from spills or releases of fracking  
          fluids from tank ruptures, or operational errors or underground  
          migration.  Fracturing chemicals may contaminate surface or  
          groundwater under these conditions.  Water is the primary  
          component of fracking fluids.  The cumulative effects of using  
          surface water or groundwater should be regulated to prevent  
          significant local effects.

          With regard to land and wildlife, the GAO raises concerns about  
          vegetation clearing, road construction, pipelines and storage  
          tanks, unintentional oil or toxic chemical spills and the  
          resulting impact on wildlife and habitat

           DOGGRs Fracking Regulations  . DOGGR has the statutory  
          responsibility to regulate fracking, but to date has not done  
          so.  In December 2012, DOGGR released a pre-rulemaking  
          discussion draft of fracking regulations to help inform the next  
          regulatory draft.  

           Once released, the proposed regulations will be vetted through a  
          year-long formal rulemaking process.  In the meantime, DOGGR is  
          conducting workshops throughout the state.  Numerous groups are  
          concerned that fracking activity is continuing absent formally  
          adopted safeguards and regulations.
           
           Others are concerned that DOGGR may not be conducting adequate  
          environmental review through the CEQA process to fully determine  
          significant environmental effects.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :  Mario DeBernardo / NAT. RES. / (916)  
          319-2092 


                                                                FN: 0001071












                                                                  AB 7
                                                                  Page 6