Amended in Assembly August 7, 2013

Amended in Assembly April 16, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Constitutional AmendmentNo. 2


Introduced by Assembly Members Nestande and Olsen

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Bigelow, Harkey, Maienschein, Wagner, and Wilk)

(Coauthor: Senator Cannella)

December 18, 2012


Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 2—A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by adding Section 8.7 to Article XVI thereof, relating to education finance.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

ACA 2, as amended, Nestande. Education finance: payment of state apportionments.

Existing law establishes the public elementary and secondary schools and the system of public community colleges in this state, and provides for a system for their funding. Provisions of the California Constitution require that a minimum amount of aggregate funding, calculated as specified, be allocated to school districts and community college districtsbegin insert unless this requirement is suspended, as providedend insert. Pursuant to existing statutes, school districts, community college districts, and other local educational agencies receive a portion of their funding through apportionments of state funds made in accordance with payment schedules.

This measure would require that the total amount due for allocation to school districts, county offices of education, charter schools, and community college districts pursuant to the constitutional minimum funding requirement described above for a fiscal year, as estimated at the time of enactment of the annual Budget Act for that fiscal year, be apportioned pursuant to statute during that fiscal year, unless that minimum funding requirement is suspended for that fiscalbegin delete year pursuant to an existing constitutional provision authorizing that suspensionend deletebegin insert yearend insert. The measure would require this estimate to be set forth in the Budget Bill passed by the Legislature.

The measure would require apportionments of state aid to school districts, county offices of education, charter schools, and community college districts to be made no later than the times specified by the statutory payment schedule that was in effect during the 2000-01 fiscal year, except that the Legislature may require by statute that these apportionments be made earlier in the fiscal year.

Vote: 23. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

P2    1Resolved by the Assembly, the Senate concurring, That the
2Legislature of the State of California at its 2013-14 Regular
3Session commencing on the third day of December 2012,
4two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring, hereby
5proposes to the people of the State of California that the
6Constitution of the State be amended as follows:

7

First--  

The people of the State of California find and declare all
8of the following:

9(a) Beginning in the 2001-02 school year as a small and
10temporary budget solution, and increasing significantly in the
112008-09 school year, California has excessively relied on deferring
12state apportionments to school districts and community college
13districts to balance the state budget.begin delete Over tenend deletebegin insert Approximately sixend insert
14 billion dollarsbegin delete ($10,000,000,000)end deletebegin insert ($6,000,000,000)end insert is now used
15as a budget mechanism to fund other government programs by
16withholding funds for our public schools and community colleges
17and not paying what is owed to them under constitutional K-12
18and community college funding guarantees, misleading
19Californians as to the true amount of cutsbegin insert forced on schoolsend insert and
20the actual funding available to operate our public schools and
21community colleges.

P3    1(b) The fact that one dollar ($1) out of everybegin delete fiveend deletebegin insert 10end insert dollarsbegin delete ($5)end delete
2begin insert ($10)end insert owed to K-12 schools and community colleges is not paid
3until after the end of the academic school year has taken a
4demoralizing toll on the teaching professions of both systems by
5contributing to education program uncertainty andbegin insert has resulted inend insert
6 unprecedented educator layoffsbegin insert over the past decadeend insert. Programs
7for K-12 pupils have been reduced or eliminated, including all of
8the following: career, vocational, and technical education;
9university preparation; afterschool programs; sports, arts, and
10music; counseling services; libraries; and even core academic
11programs. Communitybegin delete collegesend deletebegin insert college studentsend insert have reduced
12access to courses thatbegin delete studentsend deletebegin insert theyend insert need to graduate on time.

13(c) California’s increasing reliance on the budget practice of
14deferring state payments to school districts and community college
15districts results in broken promises to voters, students, and
16educators because money arrives too late to be used during the
17school year and is never recovered for the education of the students
18for whom the money was intended.

19(d) Because state revenue limit funding is reduced according to
20the amount of property taxes collected at the local level,
21low-property-tax-wealth school districts suffer more than
22high-property-tax-wealth school districts, in that state funding
23represents a greater portion of their overall budget. As a result of
24these property tax differentials, for some school districts the
25amounts deferred represent only a relatively small amount of
26money, while for other school districts the moneys deferred are a
27much larger part of their budget. This practice ultimately violates
28the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution with
29respect to California’s funding of public education.

30(e) begin deleteCross-year end deletebegin insertOver the past decade, cross-year end insertdeferrals have
31directly resulted in reduced local school district and community
32college district control over the maintenance of sound education
33practices, and have led to inadequate course offerings, unreasonable
34class sizes, the deterioration of education facilities for lack of
35maintenance funding, and the depletion of reserves for economic
36uncertainty because of accumulated annual funding losses. To
37make ends meet, school districts and community college districts
38have suffered increased borrowing costs and increased layoffs,
39and have been forced to takebegin delete emergencyend delete actions that jeopardize
40their long-term financial health.

P4    1(f) Eliminating the practice of the deferral of state
2apportionments to school districts and community college districts
3will improve our children’s education by improving school district
4and community college district financial health, and reducing the
5risk of school district or community college district insolvency or
6the disruption of services frombegin delete emergencyend delete budget cuts to school
7programs.

8(g) This measure will force the Legislature and the Governor
9to account for state funding shortfalls in an open way so that voters
10can accurately judge what is actually spent on public education
11without the mask of budget manipulation. If cuts are made to public
12education because ofbegin insert aend insert lack of funding, those cuts should be done
13openly and based on the projection of revenue for that year, and
14without deferrals that suggest that a promised payment will be
15made on some future date that begin delete has nothing to do withend delete begin insert is not withinend insert
16 the current school yearbegin insert and is unrelated to current General Fund
17revenuesend insert
.

18

Second--  

That Section 8.7 is added to Article XVI thereof, to
19read:

20

SEC. 8.7.  

(a) The total amount due for allocation to school
21districts, county offices of education, charter schools, and
22community college districts to meet the minimum funding
23requirement of Section 8 for a fiscal year, as estimated at the time
24of the enactment of the Budget Act for that fiscal year, shall be
25apportioned pursuant to statute during that fiscal year, unless that
26minimum funding requirement is suspended for that fiscal year
27pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 8. That estimate shall be set
28forth in the Budget Bill passed by the Legislature.

29(b) Apportionments of state aid to school districts, county offices
30of education, charter schools, and community college districts shall
31be made no later than the times specified by the statutory payment
32schedule that was in effect during the 2000-01 fiscal year, except
33that the Legislature may require by statute that these
34apportionments be made earlier in the fiscal year.



O

    97