Amended in Assembly May 9, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Concurrent ResolutionNo. 36


Introduced by Assembly Member Atkins

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Alejobegin delete and Chávezend deletebegin insert Chávez, end insertbegin insertAchadjian,end insertbegin insert Allen,end insertbegin insert Bigelow, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan,end insertbegin insert Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman,end insertbegin insert Fox, Frazier,end insertbegin insert Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández,end insertbegin insert Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder,end insertbegin insert Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mitchell, Morrell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Patterson, Perea, John A. Pérez, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Torres, Wagner,end insertbegin insert Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, and Yamadaend insert)

(Coauthors: Senators Roth and Wolk)

March 18, 2013


Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 36—Relative to veterans.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

ACR 36, as amended, Atkins. Veterans: treatment courts and treatment review calendars.

This measure would encourage all superior courts to consider establishing veterans treatment courts or veterans treatment review calendars to assist troubled veterans who have service-related mental health issues.

Fiscal committee: no.

P2    1WHEREAS, Historically, the State of California has honored
2the noble sacrifices that members of the Armed Forces have made
3to protect our freedoms by providing veterans and members of the
4Armed Forces certain benefits and rehabilitative services; and

5WHEREAS, California has the largest United States veteran
6population in the nation, comprised of approximately 2 million
7armed services veterans, which is 12.3 percent of the nationwide
8veteran population of nearly 25 million veterans; and

9WHEREAS, There are approximately 180,000 Operation
10Enduring Freedom/ Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) theatre
11veterans in California and 30,000 veterans are returning to
12California each year; and

13WHEREAS, Studies have shown that combat services may exact
14a tremendous psychological toll on members of the Armed Forces
15who are faced with the constant threat of death or injury over an
16extended period of time; and

17WHEREAS, Researchers have shown that a significant number
18of the 1,600,000 members of the Armed Forces who have served
19in Iraq or Afghanistan have, or will suffer from, as a result of their
20military service, mental health injuries, such as post-traumatic
21stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, depression, anxiety, and
22acute stress; and

23WHEREAS, Some studies have shown that as much as 20
24percent of the United States veterans who served in Iraq and
25Afghanistan are returning home with signs of post-traumatic stress
26disorder or other mental illnesses. Traumatic brain injury often
27accompanies post-traumatic stress disorder; and

28WHEREAS, Both physical and mental combat-related injuries
29often lead to the use of drugs and alcohol to cope with such injuries,
30which often leads to encounters with the criminal justice system
31that would not have otherwise occurred without the combat-related
32injury; and

33WHEREAS, The vast majority of returning members of the
34Armed Forces do not have contact with the criminal justice system,
35and most veterans and members of the military are well-adjusted,
36contributing members of society, but psychiatrists and law
37enforcement officials agree that combat-related injuries have led
38to instances of these service members becoming involved with the
39criminal justice system; and

P3    1WHEREAS, Recently, 12 percent of OIF/OEF veterans surveyed
2reported criminal justice involvement beyond a minor traffic
3violation. However, only 3 percent of veterans reported having
4both knowledge of and access to veterans treatment courts, veterans
5treatment review calendars, or diversion programs from prison
6available pursuant to Section 1170.9 of the Penal Code; and

7WHEREAS, A goal of veterans treatment courts and veterans
8treatment review calendars is to reduce further criminal behavior.
9This is done to keep troubled veterans out of prison, if they have
10service-related mental health problems and they allege that the
11criminal behavior resulted from these problems; and

12WHEREAS, It is the purpose of veterans treatment courts and
13veterans treatment review calendars in California to enhance public
14safety by providing a judicially supervised regimen of treatment
15intervention to serve involved veterans with unique mental health
16conditions and other problems stemming from military service;
17and

18WHEREAS, As a grateful state, we must continue to honor the
19military service of our men and women by attempting to provide
20them with an alternative to incarceration when feasible, permitting
21them instead to access proper treatment for mental health and
22substance abuse problems resulting from military service; and

23WHEREAS, The Legislature finds that it is in the best interests
24of California citizens to assist veterans and members of the Armed
25Forces involved in the criminal justice system who have a
26military-related injury. In order to achieve this end, the Legislature
27has encouraged the establishment of veterans treatment courts and
28veterans treatment review calendars to address the unique
29challenges veterans face as a result of their honorable service.
30Currently there are 13 counties in California with operational
31veterans treatment courts or veterans treatment review calendars;
32now, therefore, be it

33Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
34thereof concurring,
That the Legislature is not seeking to impart
35mandates that would stifle innovation, but instead intends to
36promote a framework within which the superior court in each
37county has the flexibility to develop a constructive model that
38works best locally to achieve positive outcomes; and be it further

39Resolved, That the Legislature encourages all superior courts
40to consider establishing veterans treatment courts or veterans
P4    1treatment review calendars within their jurisdictions to assist
2troubled veterans who have service-related mental health issues
3to turn their lives around by identifying them, assessing their needs,
4connecting them with needed services, and managing their care;
5and be it further

6Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
7of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.



O

    98