AJR 25, as amended, Gorell. Internal Revenue Service.
This measure would urge the President and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to comply with all requests related to congressional inquiries related to IRS misconduct in a full and transparent manner, and ensure that all government employees are made available for questions relating to the application of tax exempt status for religious organizations. This measure would also urge thebegin delete oppointmentend deletebegin insert appointmentend insert ofbegin delete onend deletebegin insert anend insert independent counsel to investigate the actions of the IRS.
Fiscal committee: no.
P1    1WHEREAS, Throughout its history, millions of people have 
2come to the United States seeking a haven from religious or 
3political persecution in their native lands; and
4WHEREAS, The democratic ideals of religious liberty, the 
5freedom to associate and express one’s views without fear of harm 
P2    1or recrimination, and a government that derives power from the 
2consent of the people it governs continue to be this nation’s guiding 
3principles; and
4WHEREAS, People who live under oppressive regimes around 
5the world today look to the United States as a beacon of freedom, 
6and it is essential that officials at every level of government set an 
7example by administering just laws without malice or prejudice; 
8and
9WHEREAS, The federal government is entrusted by the people 
10with great powers, including the power to tax, and the constitutional 
11guarantee of checks and balances was first established to safeguard 
12Americans from harassment or intimidation based on their political 
13or religious beliefs; and
14WHEREAS, President Barack Obama encouraged all Americans 
15in the 2013 proclamation for “Religious Freedom Day” to “let us 
16remember the legacy of faith and independence we have inherited, 
17and let us honor it by forever upholding our right to exercise our 
18beliefs free from prejudice or persecution; and
19WHEREAS, Organizations, such as nonprofits and charities, 
20seeking federal tax’ exempt status are required to file an application 
21with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS); and
22WHEREAS, The IRS’s Exempt Organizations Function, Rulings 
23and Agreements Office, which is headquartered in Washington, 
24D.C., is responsible for processing applications for tax-exempt 
25status and for reviewing applications as they are received to 
26determine whether organizations qualify for this status; and
27WHEREAS, During 2012, members of Congress raised concerns 
28to the IRS about targeting non-profits and charities based on their 
29perceived political position and the IRS’s performance of its duty 
30to treat similarly situated organizations consistently. In addition, 
31several organizations applying for tax-exempt status under IRS’s 
32Section 501 (c) (4) of the Internal Revenue Code made allegations 
33that the IRS targeted specific groups applying for tax-exempt 
34status, delayed the processing of targeted groups’ applications for 
35tax-exempt status, and requested unnecessary information from 
36targeted organizations; and
37WHEREAS, In early 2012, the Inspector General for Tax 
38Administration began an audit reviewed case files using acceptable 
39government accounting standards. Case files were selected in June 
402012 and the audit was concluded in February 2013; and
P3    1WHEREAS, The Inspector General for Tax Administration 
2found that the IRS in 2010 “developed and began using criteria to 
3identify potential political cases for review that inappropriately 
4identified specific groups applying for tax-exempt status based on 
5their names and policy positions” (Inspector General’s Final Audit 
6Report reference number 2013-10-053, Page 5); and
7WHEREAS, The Inspector General’s report found that the IRS 
8developed and began using criteria to review specific groups 
9applying for tax-exempt status based on their names or policy 
10positions instead of developing unbiosed criteria based on the tax 
11laws and treasury regulations; and
12WHEREAS, IRS officials started using search terms such as 
13“patriot,” “9/11,” and “tea party” to flag certain applicants for 
14additional scrutiny and placing them in a “Sensitive Case Report” 
15resulting in the use of selected criteria for reviewing their 
16applications; and
17WHEREAS, Some flagged organizations were required to 
18provide further documentation, including what books their 
19members were reading, as well as what they had posted on social 
20networking Websites. One group was asked to “please detail the 
21content of the members of your organization prayers.” 
22Organizations were informed that if they did not provide the 
23information sought, they would not be certified as tax-exempt; and
24WHEREAS, In 2010, several Jewish groups were targeted by 
25the IRS and asked inappropriately whether their group “supported 
26the existence of the land of Israel”; and
27WHEREAS, The Treasury Inspector General for Tax 
28Administration made numerous recommendations to the IRS, 
29including that they should document the reasons why applications 
30potentially involving political campaign intervention are chosen 
31for review, develop a process to track requests for assistance, and 
32expeditiously resolve remaining political campaign intervention 
33cases, some of which have been in process for three years, and 
34request that social welfare activity guidance be developed by the 
35Department of Treasury; and
36WHEREAS, Senior program managers at the IRS have refused 
37to answer Congress’s questions under oath, invoking their right to 
38plead the fifth Amendment under the advice of legal counsel; and
39WHEREAS, The IRS must do more so that the public has 
40reasonable assurance that the IRS will not use political criteria to 
P4    1administer the tax laws of the nation and will operate in a fair and 
2impartial manner in the future; now therefore, be it
3Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of 
4California, jointly, That the Legislature holds that government 
5agencies, including the IRS, should apply the law fairly. Profiling 
6citizens based on their political positions should not be allowed; 
7and be it further 
8Resolved, That the Legislature commends the United States 
9Congress for investigating the alleged misconduct at the Internal 
10Revenue Service and urges the President and the Internal Revenue 
11Service to comply with all requests related to congressional 
12inquiries in a full and transparent manner and ensure that all 
13government employees are made available for questions relating 
14to these matters; and be it further
15Resolved, That an independent counsel be appointed to 
16investigate the actions of the IRS in this matter and to determine 
17if any violations of law or policy occurredbegin delete,andend deletebegin insert, andend insert be it further 
18Resolved, That the Legislature condemns the actions of those 
19involved in the misuse of their office and position to discriminate 
20against individuals based on their political views; and be it further 
21Resolved, That the Legislaturebegin delete stands in support of the Treasury 
22Inspector General for Tax Administration’s recommendations for 
23the Internal Revenue Service and urges that, if the IRS fails to take 
24action, Congress should pass and the President should sign 
25legislation that enacts those recommendations into federal law.end delete
26begin insert urges the full cooperation of involved individuals and governmental 
27entities, including Congress and the Federal Bureau of 
28Investigation, in order to take all appropriate action to prevent 
29discrimination in the application of the law by the IRS; and be it 
30furtherend insert
31Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit 
32copies of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the 
33United States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to 
34the Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each Senator and 
35Representative from California in the Congress of the United 
36States.
O
98