Amended in Assembly August 22, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 27


Introduced by Assembly Member Donnelly

(Coauthors: Assembly Members Allen,begin insert Grove,end insert Harkey, Jones, Mansoor, Olsen, and Wilk)

(Coauthor: Senator Anderson)

July 2, 2013


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 27—Relative to privacy.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 27, as amended, Donnelly. Limiting Internet and Blanket Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act.

This measure would urge Congress to pass and the President to sign into law the Limiting Internet and Blanket Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act (LIBERT-E Act), and ensure that the American people are protected from massive invasions of their privacy.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Representative Justin Amash, Chairman of the
2House Liberty Caucus, and Representative John Conyers, Jr., the
3Ranking Member on the House Judiciary Committee, announced
4the introduction of bipartisan legislation to address National
5Security Agency (NSA) surveillance; and

6WHEREAS, House Resolution 2399, the Limiting Internet and
7Blanket Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act
8(LIBERT-E Act), restricts the federal government’s ability under
9the Patriot Act to collect information on Americans who are not
P2    1connected to an ongoing investigation. The bill also requires that
2secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court opinions
3be made available to Congress and summaries of the opinions be
4made available to the public; and

5WHEREAS, A coalition of 32 Members of Congress joined
6Representatives Conyers and Amash in introducing the bill late
7Monday, June 17, 2013; and

8WHEREAS, In a statement, Representatives Conyers and Amash
9stated: “The recent NSA leaks indicate that the federal government
10collects phone records and intercepts electronic communications
11on a scale previously unknown to most Americans. The LIBERT-E
12Act imposes reasonable limits on the federal government’s
13surveillance”; and

14WHEREAS, Representatives Conyers and Amash also stated:
15“[The LIBERT-E Act] also makes sure that innocent Americans’
16information isn’t needlessly swept up into a government database”;
17and

18WHEREAS, Thirty-two Representatives from both sides of the
19aisle cosponsored the LIBERT-E Act; and

20WHEREAS, Representative Judy Chu of California stated:
21“Oversight conducted in secret defeats its purpose. Congress should
22be able to have an open dialogue with the American people on
23how our surveillance programs impact individual privacy. That’s
24why I support the release of unclassified reports by the
25Administration on how FISA powers are used. We must protect
26our national security operations, but we need to strike a balance
27between clandestine efforts and transparency in our society”; and

28WHEREAS, Representative Barbara Lee of California stated:
29“The right to privacy in this country in non-negotiable. While I
30believe that national security is essential, we must protect our most
31basic civil liberties and move forward in a way that does not
32sacrifice our American values and freedoms. I’m proud to be an
33original co-sponsor of this bill, which ensures that we keep a better
34balance between our privacy and our national security by limiting
35the scope of records that can be handed over and by re-establishing
36and strengthening Congress’ vital role of accountability and
37oversight of this issue”; and

38WHEREAS, Representative Zoe Lofgren of California stated:
39“Increasingly it seems surveillance laws are used in ways that do
40not always respect Americans’ Constitutional rights for privacy
P3    1or provide adequate transparency to ensure the government is
2acting appropriately. The revelations that these laws that should
3be targeting threats to our country have also been quietly used to
4collect millions of Americans’ personal information justifies the
5public’s apprehension about government abuse of surveillance
6powers. The LIBERT-E Act raises the standards needed to obtain
7personal information in national security investigations, prevents
8dragnets, and requires greater transparency on how agencies are
9using the surveillance powers Congress grants them”; and

10WHEREAS, Representative Tom McClintock, also of California,
11stated: “A free society does not depend on a police state that tracks
12the behavior of every citizen for its security. A free society depends
13instead on principles of law that protect liberty while meting out
14stern punishment to those who abuse it”; and

15WHEREAS, The LIBERT-E Act enjoys bipartisan efforts from
16hundreds of groupsbegin delete likeend deletebegin insert such asend insert the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
17the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Republican Liberty
18Caucus urging constituents to demand support from their
19representatives; now, therefore, be it

20Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
21California, jointly,
That the Legislature urges Congress to pass
22and the President to sign into law the Limiting Internet and Blanket
23Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act, and
24ensure that the American people are protected from massive
25invasions of their privacy; and be it further

26Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
27of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
28States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
29Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, to the Majority
30Leader of the Senate, to the Minority Leader of the Senate, and to
31each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress
32of the United States, and to the author for appropriate distribution.



O

    98