AJR 27, as amended, Donnelly. Limiting Internet and Blanket Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act.
This measure would urge Congress to pass and the President to sign into law the Limiting Internet and Blanket Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act (LIBERT-E Act), and ensure that the American people are protected from massive invasions of their privacy.
Fiscal committee: no.
P1    1WHEREAS, Representative Justin Amash, Chairman of the 
2House Liberty Caucus, and Representative John Conyers, Jr., the 
3Ranking Member on the House Judiciary Committee, announced 
4the introduction of bipartisan legislation to address National 
5Security Agency (NSA) surveillance; and
6WHEREAS, House Resolution 2399, the Limiting Internet and 
7Blanket Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act 
8(LIBERT-E Act), restricts the federal government’s ability under 
9the Patriot Act to collect information on Americans who are not 
P2    1connected to an ongoing investigation. The bill also requires that 
2secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court opinions 
3be made available to Congress and summaries of the opinions be 
4made available to the public; and
5WHEREAS, A coalition of 32 Members of Congress joined 
6Representatives Conyers and Amash in introducing the bill late 
7Monday, June 17, 2013; and
8WHEREAS, In a statement, Representatives Conyers and Amash 
9stated: “The recent NSA leaks indicate that the federal government 
10collects phone records and intercepts electronic communications 
11on a scale previously unknown to most Americans. The LIBERT-E 
12Act imposes reasonable limits on the federal government’s 
13surveillance”; and 
14WHEREAS, Representatives Conyers and Amash also stated: 
15“[The LIBERT-E Act] also makes sure that innocent Americans’ 
16information isn’t needlessly swept up into a government database”; 
17and
18WHEREAS, Thirty-two Representatives from both sides of the 
19aisle cosponsored the LIBERT-E Act; and
20WHEREAS, Representative Judy Chu of California stated: 
21“Oversight conducted in secret defeats its purpose. Congress should 
22be able to have an open dialogue with the American people on 
23how our surveillance programs impact individual privacy. That’s 
24why I support the release of unclassified reports by the 
25Administration on how FISA powers are used. We must protect 
26our national security operations, but we need to strike a balance 
27between clandestine efforts and transparency in our society”; and
28WHEREAS, Representative Barbara Lee of California stated: 
29“The right to privacy in this country in non-negotiable. While I 
30believe that national security is essential, we must protect our most 
31basic civil liberties and move forward in a way that does not 
32sacrifice our American values and freedoms. I’m proud to be an 
33original co-sponsor of this bill, which ensures that we keep a better 
34balance between our privacy and our national security by limiting 
35the scope of records that can be handed over and by re-establishing 
36and strengthening Congress’ vital role of accountability and 
37oversight of this issue”; and
38WHEREAS, Representative Zoe Lofgren of California stated: 
39“Increasingly it seems surveillance laws are used in ways that do 
40not always respect Americans’ Constitutional rights for privacy 
P3    1or provide adequate transparency to ensure the government is 
2acting appropriately. The revelations that these laws that should 
3be targeting threats to our country have also been quietly used to 
4collect millions of Americans’ personal information justifies the 
5public’s apprehension about government abuse of surveillance 
6powers. The LIBERT-E Act raises the standards needed to obtain 
7personal information in national security investigations, prevents 
8dragnets, and requires greater transparency on how agencies are 
9using the surveillance powers Congress grants them”; and
10WHEREAS, Representative Tom McClintock, also of California, 
11stated: “A free society does not depend on a police state that tracks 
12the behavior of every citizen for its security. A free society depends 
13instead on principles of law that protect liberty while meting out 
14stern punishment to those who abuse it”; and
15WHEREAS, The LIBERT-E Act enjoys bipartisan efforts from 
16hundreds of groupsbegin delete likeend deletebegin insert such asend insert the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 
17the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Republican Liberty 
18Caucus urging constituents to demand support from their 
19representatives; now, therefore, be it
20Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of 
21California, jointly, That the Legislature urges Congress to pass 
22and the President to sign into law the Limiting Internet and Blanket 
23Electronic Review of Telecommunications and Email Act, and 
24ensure that the American people are protected from massive 
25invasions of their privacy; and be it further
26Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies 
27of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United 
28States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the 
29Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, to the Majority 
30Leader of the Senate, to the Minority Leader of the Senate, and to 
31each Senator and Representative from California in the Congress 
32of the United States, and to the author for appropriate distribution.
O
98