California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 29


Introduced by Assembly Member Brown

August 5, 2013


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 29—Relative to senior nutrition services and programs.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 29, as introduced, Brown. Senior nutrition services and programs: funding.

This measure would memorialize the Congress and President of the United States to restore federal funding cuts, due to sequestration, to senior nutrition programs, and to declare senior nutrition services and programs exempt from further budget cuts.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, The United States federal budget reductions, known
2as sequestration began on March 1, 2013; and

3WHEREAS, In 2011, the United States Congress adopted, and
4President Obama signed, the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L.
5112-25, hereafter the act), as an intended compromise and incentive
6to address fundamental federal budgetary policy and direction;
7and

8WHEREAS, Section 302 of the act directed that, if a 10-year
9deficit reduction plan was not enacted, significant amounts of
10discretionary federal fiscal year 2013 funds would not be available
11for spending; and

12WHEREAS, As the act mandates, and because Congress failed
13to pass a bill reducing the federal deficit by $1.2 trillion, that
P2    1amount will be automatically sequestered through across-the-board
2federal budget cuts from mandatory and discretionary spending in
3the years 2013 to 2021, inclusive, unless Congress takes alternate
4action; and

5WHEREAS, The cuts enacted by the act, initially set to begin
6on January 1, 2013, were postponed by two months by the
7American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-240), thereby
8amplifying the impact of spending reductions starting on March
91, 2013; and

10WHEREAS, The act requires that every federal program be cut
11equally, including programs and services authorized by the Older
12Americans Act of 1965 and administered by the Administration
13for Community Living which oversees food and nutrition programs,
14elder abuse prevention, caregiver support, healthy aging, and
15employment for low-income seniors isolated due to extreme
16poverty and disability; and

17WHEREAS, Nutrition programs provide important links to other
18supportive in-home and community-based services, including
19homemaker-home health aide services, transportation, physical
20activity programs, home repair, home modification programs, as
21well as nutrition screening, assessment, education, and counseling,
22and special health assessments for diseases including hypertension
23and diabetes; and

24WHEREAS, Home-delivered meal programs provide vital
25nutrition to homebound individuals, and provide volunteers and
26paid staff delivering meals an opportunity to check on the welfare
27of those homebound meal recipients, and to report any health or
28other problems those volunteers and staff may notice during those
29visits, which may decrease feelings of isolation among those
30homebound meal recipients; and

31WHEREAS, Congregate nutrition programs provide nutritious
32meals, nutrition education, and nutrition risk screening, and provide
33seniors with positive social contact with other seniors; and

34WHEREAS, Providing meals to eligible individuals can enhance
35their ability to remain independent and in their own homes, thus
36preventing unnecessary, costly, and premature institutionalization;
37and

38WHEREAS, Older Californians are far less likely, due to age
39and disability, to obtain employment to compensate for lost
40nutrition and other benefits, forcing their families to back-fill with
P3    1resources intended to support their children and placing their entire
2family’s well-being at greater risk; and

3WHEREAS, State and federal funding reductions result in the
4loss of equipment, deterioration of distribution systems, and erosion
5of other innovations created by networks of community
6organizations, local governmental agencies, and faith communities
7upon which a vast array of food-insecure Californians rely; and

8WHEREAS, According to the California Department of Aging,
9the sequester cuts will result in federal funds to these
10home-delivered, congregate nutrition, and nutrition services
11incentive programs being reduced by approximately an aggregate
12of $6.6 million during federal fiscal year 2013-14, and
13approximately an aggregate of $5.09 million in each subsequent
14federal fiscal year, thus depriving thousands of California seniors
15of vital health and nutrition services; now, therefore, be it

16Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
17California, jointly,
That the Legislature memorializes the Congress
18and President of the United States to restore funding to senior
19nutrition programs, similar to the way funding was restored for air
20traffic control services; and be it further

21Resolved, That the Legislature memorializes the Congress and
22President to declare senior nutrition services and programs exempt
23from further budget cuts due to the disproportionate growth of the
24aging population and the corresponding disproportionate impact
25of the sequester cuts upon that population; and be it further

26Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
27of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
28States, to the Majority Leader of the Senate, to the Speaker of the
29House of Representatives, to each Senator and Representative from
30California in the Congress of the United States, to the Director of
31the California Department of Aging, and to the author for
32appropriate distribution.



O

    99