BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó



                                                                            



           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                         AJR 6|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                              |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                              |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                              |
          |327-4478                          |                              |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
                                           
                                    THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AJR 6
          Author:   Fox (D)
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 6/4/13
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Gaines, Beall, Cannella, Galgiani, Hueso,  
            Lara, Liu, Roth, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Pavley
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  70-1, 4/29/13 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Unmanned aircraft systems:  test sites

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST :    This resolution requests the Federal Aviation  
          Administration (FAA) to consider California as one of the test  
          sites for unmanned aircraft systems.

           ANALYSIS  :    Unmanned aerial systems (UAS), commonly referred to  
          as drones, are aircraft without a human pilot on board; flight  
          is controlled either autonomously by computers on the aircraft,  
          or under the remote control of a pilot who is on the ground or  
          in another vehicle.  UAS range in size from as large as a Boeing  
          737 to smaller than a radio-controlled model airplane.   

          The FAA first authorized use of UAS in 1990 and has since then  
          authorized limited use for firefighting, disaster relief, search  
          and rescue, law enforcement, border patrol, military training,  
                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                      AJR 6
                                                                     Page  
          2

          and testing and evaluation.  Operators must apply to the FAA for  
          approval prior to operating UAS.  The FAA currently does not  
          authorize UAS operations in Class B airspace, which exists over  
          major urban areas and contains the highest density of manned  
          aircraft in the national airspace system, so UAS use is very  
          limited.   

          In February 2012, Congress passed and President Obama signed  
          H.R. 658 (Public Law 112-95), the FAA Modernization and Reform  
          Act of 2012.  Among other things, H.R. 658 requires the United  
          States Department of Transportation to develop a comprehensive  
          plan to safely accelerate integration of UAS into the national  
          airspace system by 2015.  H.R. 658 also requires the FAA to  
          establish a five-year pilot program at six test sites to  
          integrate UAS into the national airspace system.  The FAA has  
          accepted applications from 50 organizations in 37 states,  
          including two in California, and expects to select the six test  
          sites later this year.

          This resolution requests the FAA to consider California as one  
          of the test sites for UAS.

           Comments
           
           Purpose  .  The author's office states that while 10 states have  
          established commissions or public-private partnerships aimed at  
          acquiring a test site, California has not.  The author therefore  
          introduced this resolution to highlight the need for the FAA to  
          consider California as a desirable test site and for state  
          leaders to participate in the application process.

          According to a March 2013 report by the Association for Unmanned  
          Vehicle Systems International, public safety and precision  
          agriculture comprise 90% of potential markets for UAS.  Public  
          safety officials who might use UAS technology include police  
          officers, firefighters, and emergency medical providers, in  
          cases of natural disasters, man-made disasters, and crimes.   
          Precision agriculture includes remote sensing, where remote  
          sensors are used to scan plants for health problems, records  
          growth rates and hydration, and locate disease outbreaks.  It  
          also includes precision application, where crop farmers and  
          horticulturists use targeted spray techniques to more  
          selectively apply pesticides and nutrients, thereby saving money  
          and reducing environmental impacts.  The report states that 10  

                                                                CONTINUED





                                                                      AJR 6
                                                                     Page  
          3

          states - including California - stand to benefit most in terms  
          of job creation and additional revenue as a result of increased  
          UAS production.

           Privacy and other concerns  .  According to the National  
          Conference of State Legislatures, 43 states are considering or  
          have enacted legislation restricting UAS, due to concerns about  
          privacy, benefits, and business interests.  In February 2013,  
          the FAA issued a request for public input to help ensure that  
          privacy questions are addressed in the pilot program.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Fiscal Com.:  No


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  70-1, 4/29/13
          AYES:  Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Bigelow, Bloom, Blumenfield,  
            Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian  
            Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley,  
            Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Beth  
            Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gray, Grove, Hagman,  
            Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer,  
            Levine, Linder, Logue, Lowenthal, Maienschein, Mansoor,  
            Medina, Melendez, Mitchell, Morrell, Mullin, Muratsuchi,  
            Nazarian, Nestande, Olsen, Patterson, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez,  
            Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Salas, Skinner, Ting, Torres, Wagner,  
            Waldron, Weber, Wilk, Williams, John A. Pérez
          NOES:  Donnelly
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ammiano, Atkins, Gorell, Pan, Rendon, Stone,  
            Wieckowski, Yamada, Vacancy


          JA:k  6/4/13   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                   ****  END  ****









                                                                CONTINUED