California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Joint ResolutionNo. 7


Introduced by Assembly Member Bonta

January 30, 2013


Assembly Joint Resolution No. 7—Relative to public social services.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AJR 7, as introduced, Bonta. Social security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

This measure would request the President and the United States Congress to exclude social security, Medicare, and Medicaid from being a part of any legislation to reduce the federal deficit. This measure would express the Legislature’s opposition to cuts to social security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and call on California’s representatives to the United States Congress to vote against cuts to social security, Medicare, and Medicaid and to consider improving those systems in ways that would strengthen their protections.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, Social security and Medicare are the foundations
2of income and health security for older Californians and those with
3severe work disabilities, providing monthly cash benefits and
4health insurance to over 5 million Californians, including 3.4
5million retirees and nearly 700,000 disabled workers; and

6WHEREAS, Social security is the single most important source
7of life insurance protection for California’s children and provides
8a vital guaranteed income to 370,000 children throughout the state;
9and

10WHEREAS, Social security prevents more than 1.1 million
11Californians from living in poverty; and

P2    1WHEREAS, Social security provides benefits to more than 9
2million veterans nationwide, which is roughly four out of 10
3veterans; and

4WHEREAS, Social security annually contributes nearly $67
5billion dollars to California’s economy by paying benefits to over
65.1 million residents in the state; and

7WHEREAS, Social security’s funding is independent of that of
8the rest of the federal government, and has never contributed to,
9and by law can never contribute to, the federal deficit; and

10WHEREAS, Social security in fact has a surplus of $2.7 trillion
11dollars today that is expected to grow to $3.1 trillion dollars by
122020; and

13WHEREAS, Social security is not in crisis and has sufficient
14resources to meet all of its obligations through 2032 and has
15dedicated revenues that would -- even in the absence of
16Congressional reforms -- meet three-quarters of promised benefits
17thereafter; and

18WHEREAS, Social security’s funding shortfall after 2032 is
19modest: about one-half of the cost of the Bush tax cuts of 2001
20and 2003; and

21WHEREAS, There are many policy options available to close
22social security’s funding shortfall without cutting benefits,
23including eliminating the cap on earnings subject to the payroll
24tax, which would eliminate about 80 percent of the 75-year
25shortfall, or raising the payroll tax rate from 6.2 to 7.2 percent
26gradually over 20 years, which would eliminate one-half of the
27shortfall; and

28WHEREAS, Americans prefer raising payroll taxes to cutting
29social security benefits by a margin of 53 percent to 36 percent;
30and

31WHEREAS, Social security’s modest but vital benefits,
32averaging just $12,930 per year in California, are critical to the
33economic security of those who receive those benefits; and

34WHEREAS, Losses of pensions, 401(k) balances, home equity,
35and earnings have greatly diminished the retirement income
36prospects of Californians; and

37WHEREAS, The social security benefit cuts imposed in 1983
38will, when fully phased in, cut benefits by roughly 25 percent; and

39WHEREAS, Forty-seven percent of elderly Californians are
40struggling just to make ends meet and more than one-half of
P3    1working Californians will not have saved enough to be able to
2maintain their standard of living in retirement; and

3WHEREAS, Proposals to increase the social security retirement
4age to 69 would cut benefits by an additional 13 percent on top of
5the 13 percent cut that occurred when the retirement age increased
6from 65 to 67; and

7WHEREAS, The physical demands of a job differ from industry
8to industry and, on average, the longevity of the lives of individuals
9differ significantly according to their level of income, education,
10race, and access to health care; and

11WHEREAS, Social security belongs to the people who have
12worked hard all their lives and contributed to the program, and it
13is based on a promise that if you pay in, you and your family can
14collect your money when you retire, experience a severe disability,
15or die; and

16WHEREAS, Medicare insures almost 4 million California
17seniors for health care at a fraction of the administrative costs of
18private plans; and

19WHEREAS, Medicare has controlled its costs better than private
20insurance plans; and

21WHEREAS, Although increasing the eligibility age for Medicare
22would save the federal government some money, it would add
23billions of dollars to what we as a country spend on health care
24and shift costs onto other governmental entities, businesses, and
25many individuals who cannot afford those costs; and

26WHEREAS, Medicaid is a critical source of protection for over
2711 million low-income children, adults, and elderly Californians,
28many of whom have severe disabilities or are in need of long-term
29care; and

30WHEREAS, Our social security, Medicare, and Medicaid
31systems are fundamental to protecting against risks to which all
32Californians are subject; and

33WHEREAS, Our social security, Medicare, and Medicaid
34systems give expression to widely held values, including caring
35for our families, our neighbors, and ourselves, personal
36responsibility, hard work, and dignity; now, therefore, be it

37Resolved by the Assembly and the Senate of the State of
38California, jointly,
That the California State Legislature urges the
39President and the Congress of the United States to exclude social
P4    1security, Medicare, and Medicaid from being a part of any
2legislation to reduce the federal deficit; and be it further

3Resolved, That the California State Legislature opposes cuts to
4social security, Medicare and Medicaid, and calls on our state’s
5representatives in Washington, D.C. to vote against any cuts and
6consider improving those systems in ways that will strengthen
7their protections; and be it further.

8Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
9of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
10States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
11Majority Leader of the Senate, and to each Senator and
12Representative from California in the Congress of the United
13States.



O

    99