BILL ANALYSIS Ó ----------------------------------------------------------------- |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 71| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- THIRD READING Bill No: AB 71 Author: V. Manuel Pérez (D) and Hueso (D) Amended: 9/3/13 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER COMMITTEE : 8-1, 6/11/13 AYES: Pavley, Cannella, Evans, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Monning, Wolk NOES: Fuller SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 5-2, 8/30/13 AYES: De León, Hill, Lara, Padilla, Steinberg NOES: Walters, Gaines ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 76-0, 4/25/13 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Salton Sea restoration SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill requires the Natural Resources Agency (Agency) to lead Salton Sea restoration efforts in coordination with the Salton Sea Authority (Authority), and authorizes the Authority to lead a restoration funding and feasibility study. ANALYSIS : Existing law, until January 1, 2013, established the Salton Sea Restoration Council (Council) as a state agency in the Agency to oversee the restoration of the Salton Sea. This bill: CONTINUED AB 71 Page 2 1.Requires the Secretary of the Agency, in consultation and coordination with the Authority, to lead Salton Sea restoration efforts, and provides that such restoration efforts must include: a) early start habitat demonstration projects; b) biological investigations; c) investigations of water quality, sedimentation and inflows; d) air quality investigations in consultation and coordination with air quality agencies; e) geotechnical investigations; and, f) local financial assistance grant programs. 2.Provides that the Secretary and the Legislature must maintain full authority and responsibility for any state obligation under the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA), and must have final approval for any proposed restoration plan. 3.Authorizes the Department of Water Resources (DWR), to the extent funding is available for this purpose, to undertake Salton Sea restoration efforts, and requires DWR to disclose specified information relating to the Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Project. 4.Authorizes the Authority to undertake a restoration funding and feasibility study, in consultation with the Agency, and requires the study to include specified elements. 5.Requires the Secretary to seek input from the Authority with regard to specific restoration components, including design options and integration of habitat, public access and air quality objectives, public access and recreation, economic development opportunities, habitat locations, vector and predator control, and feasible financial resources to fund restoration. 6.States legislative findings and declarations regarding the Salton Sea and its benefits and threats. States legislative intent to permanently protect fish and wildlife dependent on the Salton Sea, restore habitat, mitigate air quality impacts, protect water quality, maintain the Salton Sea as a vital link in the Pacific Flyway, preserve local tribal heritage and cultural values, minimize noxious odors, coordinate with other agencies with responsibilities under the QSA, and enhance economic development opportunities. CONTINUED AB 71 Page 3 Background Several laws have been passed that focus on the restoration of the Salton Sea and the governance of any such effort. These laws have been subsequently amended in an effort to achieve an elusive agreement among numerous parties concerning funding, governance, and the overall objectives of restoration. The original Salton Sea Restoration Act (Act), adopted in 2003, contains findings and legislative intent that the state undertake the restoration of the Salton Sea ecosystem and the permanent protection of the wildlife dependent on that ecosystem and that restoration be based on the preferred alternative developed as a result of a restoration study and alternative selection process. That law also provided that the preferred alternative provide the maximum feasible attainment of specified environmental objectives, including restoration of long-term stable aquatic and shoreline habitat to historic levels and diversity of fish and wildlife dependent on the Salton Sea, elimination of air quality impacts from restoration projects, and protection of water quality. Other laws passed in 2003 dealt with the process of Salton Sea restoration and other aspects of the Quantification Settlement Agreement that provided for the transfer of Colorado River water from Imperial Irrigation District to San Diego as part of an effort to contain California's overall water use from that river to an amount set by federal law. The Act also requires the Secretary of the Resources Agency (now the Natural Resources Agency), in consultation with the Department of Fish and Game (now DFW), DWR, the Authority, air quality districts, and the Salton Sea Advisory Committee to undertake a restoration study to determine a preferred alternative for restoration of the Salton Sea, to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) analyzing the alternatives, and to submit a preferred alternative to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2006. The Agency published a Final PEIR and submitted a preferred alternative, with an estimated cost of nearly $9 billion, to the Legislature in May 2007. The Legislature has not acted on the preferred alternative proposed by the Resources Agency in 2007 but has appropriated funding for the Species Conservation Habitat Project, which is similar to the early start habitat projects described as Phase 1 in the 2007 PEIR. CONTINUED AB 71 Page 4 The Legislature passed and the Governor signed SB 51 (Ducheny, Chapter 303, Statutes of 2010) which, among other things, established the Council to serve as the state agency responsible for overseeing restoration of the Salton Sea. SB 51 required the Council to evaluate Salton Sea restoration plans, including the $9 billion 2007 preferred alternative, and to report to the Governor and the Legislature by June 30, 2013 with a recommended restoration plan. The Governor's 2012 Reorganization Plan, as modified by budget trailer bill SB 1018 (Leno, Chapter 39, Statutes of 2012), eliminated the Council, effective December 31, 2012, before the Council ever actually met. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, less than $150,000 in costs from the Salton Sea Restoration Fund (special) for the agency to lead restoration efforts regarding the restoration of the Salton Sea as the bill is largely consistent with existing activities. SUPPORT : (Verified 9/3/13) Coachella Valley Economic Partnership Coachella Valley Water District County of Imperial County of Riverside Defenders of Wildlife Imperial Irrigation District Indio Chamber of Commerce Salton Sea Authority Sierra Club California Wilson Johnson Commercial Real Estate ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, the elimination of the Council, as described earlier, has created a void in determining how the state meets its obligations to restore the Salton Sea pursuant to the Quantification Settlement Agreement and other state laws. The author believes that this bill creates a balanced approach with a defined lead role for the Natural Resources Agency with a consultative role for local interests and environmental stakeholders including the Salton Sea Authority, a joint powers agency comprised of two counties, CONTINUED AB 71 Page 5 two water agencies, and one Native American tribe. Sierra Club California describes the Salton Sea as "on the verge of catastrophic change as the amount of water flow in the sea will decrease significantly over the next 20 years." It is concerned that the increase in salinity will affect fish and wildlife habitat and that more exposed lakebed will result in dust and particulates that will further compromise air quality in that region. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 76-0, 4/25/13 AYES: Achadjian, Alejo, Allen, Ammiano, Atkins, Bigelow, Bloom, Blumenfield, Bocanegra, Bonilla, Bonta, Bradford, Brown, Buchanan, Ian Calderon, Campos, Chau, Chávez, Chesbro, Conway, Cooley, Dahle, Daly, Dickinson, Donnelly, Eggman, Fong, Fox, Frazier, Beth Gaines, Garcia, Gatto, Gomez, Gordon, Gorell, Gray, Grove, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Roger Hernández, Holden, Jones, Jones-Sawyer, Levine, Linder, Logue, Maienschein, Mansoor, Medina, Melendez, Mitchell, Morrell, Mullin, Muratsuchi, Nestande, Olsen, Pan, Perea, V. Manuel Pérez, Quirk, Quirk-Silva, Rendon, Salas, Skinner, Stone, Ting, Torres, Wagner, Waldron, Weber, Wieckowski, Wilk, Williams, Yamada, John A. Pérez NO VOTE RECORDED: Lowenthal, Nazarian, Patterson, Vacancy RM:nl 9/3/13 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END **** CONTINUED