BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  ACR 65
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          ACR 65 (Hall)
          As Introduced  June 12, 2013
          Majority vote 

           TRANSPORTATION      12-1        APPROPRIATIONS      16-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Linder, Achadjian, Bloom, |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow,   |
          |     |Bonta, Daly, Gatto,       |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Holden, Logue, Morrell,   |     |Calderon, Campos, Eggman, |
          |     |Nazarian, Patterson,      |     |Gomez, Hall, Holden,      |
          |     |Quirk-Silva               |     |Linder, Pan, Quirk,       |
          |     |                          |     |Wagner, Weber             |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Lowenthal                 |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Designates the western span of the San  
          Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge the "Willie L. Brown, Jr. Bridge."   
          Specifically,  this resolution  :  

          1)Recounts the lifetime accomplishments of Willie L. Brown, Jr.  
            in California's public service.  

          2)Designates the western span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay  
            Bridge as the "Willie L. Brown, Jr. Bridge" to honor and  
            commemorate Mr. Brown's many contributions to California.  

          3)Requests that the California Department of Transportation  
            (Caltrans) determine the cost of the appropriate signs,  
            consistent with signing requirements for the state highway  
            system and, upon receiving donations from non-state sources  
            sufficient to cover the cost of the signs, to erect those  
            signs.  

           EXISTING LAW  assigns Caltrans with responsibility to operate and  
          maintain state highways.  This includes the installation and  
          maintenance of highway signs.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, minor costs to Caltrans to erect the signs are to be  
          covered by non-state donations.  








                                                                  ACR 65
                                                                  Page  2



           COMMENTS  :  Born on March 20, 1934, to Willie Lewis Brown, Sr.  
          and Minnie Collins Boyd in Mineola, Texas, Mr. Brown received a  
          Bachelor of Arts degree from San Francisco State University in  
          1955 and a Juris Doctor from the University of California,  
          Hasting College of Law in 1958.   Mr. Brown served in the  
          California Legislature as an Assembly Member for 30 years, from  
          1965 until 1995.  He was the longest serving Speaker of the  
          Assembly in California history, serving from 1980 until 1995.    
          Subsequent to that, he served for two terms as Mayor of the City  
          and County of San Francisco.  Mr. Brown is the father of four  
          children.  

          Each legislative session produces a number of Senate and  
          Assembly resolutions proposing to name state highway segments or  
          structures in honor of some individual, group or historical  
          event.  Over the years, an informal policy developed relative to  
          the criteria for approval of such designations and memorials.   
          The lack of firm legislative guidelines often resulted in  
          inconsistency or controversy over a proposed designation.  In  
          response, the Transportation Committee adopted a resolution at  
          the beginning of this legislative session to provide guidelines  
          for naming highways and structures.  The resolution is intended  
          to promote fairness in determining whether a particular facility  
          or segment is to be specially designated.  Specific minimum  
          criteria identified in the Transportation Committee's resolution  
          are:

          1)Any person being honored must have provided extraordinary  
            public service or some exemplary contribution to the public  
            good and have a connection to the community where the highway  
            is located;

          2)The author or a co-author of the resolution must represent the  
            district in which the facility is located and the resolution  
            must identify the specific highway segment or structure being  
            named; 

          3)The proposed designation must reflect a community consensus;
          
          4)The proposed designation may not supersede an existing  
            designation unless the sponsor can document that a good faith  
            effort has uncovered no opposition to rescinding the prior  
            designation; and,








                                                                  ACR 65
                                                                  Page  3



          5)When a resolution names a highway or structure in honor of an  
            individual, the designee must have been deceased, except in  
            the instance of elected officials, in which case they must be  
            out of office.  

          This resolution fails to meet two of the criteria adopted by the  
          Transportation Committee:  its author (or co-authors) does not  
          represent the district in which the bridge is located; and the  
          proposed designation arguably lacks community consensus, as  
          demonstrated via critical media editorials.  
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 


                                                                FN: 0001825