California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly Concurrent ResolutionNo. 73


Introduced by Assembly Member Roger Hernández

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Buchanan)

August 5, 2013


Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 73—Relative to the Glass-Steagall Act.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

ACR 73, as introduced, Roger Hernández. The Glass-Steagall Act.

This measure would urge the President and the Congress of the United States to enact federal legislation to protect the public interest by reviving the separation between commercial banking and speculative activity embodied in the Glass-Steagall Act.

Fiscal committee: no.

P1    1WHEREAS, An effective monetary and banking system is
2essential to the proper functioning of the economy; and

3WHEREAS, In order to be effective, a monetary and banking
4system must serve the public interest; and

5WHEREAS, The federal Banking Act of 1933, commonly
6referred to as the Glass-Steagall Act, contained key provisions that
7served the public interest by prohibiting commercial banks from
8engaging in the kinds of investment banking and speculative
9activity that contributed to the collapse of the banking system
10during the Great Depression; and

11WHEREAS, In 1999, Congress repealed these key provisions
12of the Glass-Steagall Act, allowing commercial banks to engage
13in speculative activity once more; and

P2    1WHEREAS, The resulting commercial bank involvement in
2speculative activity worked against the public interest by placing
3the commercial banks themselves in financial jeopardy and
4contributing to the Great Recession; and

5WHEREAS, Although, in 2010, Congress passed the
6Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to
7address the root causes of the recession, that act does not provide
8the same level of protection from speculative activity in the
9financial markets as the provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act did;
10and

11WHEREAS, The public interest will continue to be at risk until
12commercial banks are prohibited from engaging in speculative
13activity again; and

14WHEREAS, In the current Congress, Congresswoman Marcy
15Kaptur (D-Ohio) and Congressman Walter Jones (R-North
16Carolina) have introduced H.R. 129, and Senator Tom Harkin
17(D-Iowa) has introduced S. 985, known as the Return to Prudent
18Banking Act of 2013, to revive the separation between commercial
19banking and speculative activity embodied in the repealed
20provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act; and

21WHEREAS, The Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2013
22received support from diverse, and sometimes opposing groups
23and individuals, including, but not limited to, all of the following:
24the AFL-CIO; the American Federation of Teachers; the
25International Association of Machinists; Thomas Hoenig, Vice
26Chair of the FDIC; David Stockman, former Chair of the Office
27of Management and Budget under Ronald Reagan; economists
28Luigi Zingales and Lyndon LaRouche; Robert Reich, former Labor
29Secretary under Bill Clinton; Stanford Weill, former CEO of
30Citibank and leader of the effort to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act
31in 1999; and various state legislatures, more than 20 of which have
32filed resolutions urging Congress to restore the Glass-Steagall Act;
33now, therefore, be it

34Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
35thereof concurring,
That the Legislature urges the President and
36the Congress of the United States to enact federal legislation to
37protect the public interest by reviving the separation between
38commercial banking and speculative activity embodied in the
39Glass-Steagall Act; and be it further

P3    1Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies
2of this resolution to the President and Vice President of the United
3States, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, to the
4Majority Leader of the Senate, to each member of California’s
5delegation to Congress, and to the author for appropriate
6distribution.



O

    99