BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                            Senator Kevin de León, Chair


          AB 118 (Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials) -  
          Safe Drinking Water Sate Revolving Fund.
          
          Amended: June 17, 2013          Policy Vote: EQ 9-0, Health 9-0
          Urgency: No                     Mandate: No
          Hearing Date: August 12, 2013                     Consultant:  
          Marie Liu     
          
          This bill meets the criteria for referral to the Suspense File.
          
          
          Bill Summary: AB 118 would declare certain water systems serving  
          a severely disadvantaged community as eligible for a grant  
          instead of a loan from the State Drinking Water State Revolving  
          Fund (SDWSRF) and would allow loans from the SDWSRF to cover the  
          full cost of a project, subject to availability of funds and the  
          applicant's ability to repay.

          Fiscal Impact: 
              Unknown increased cost pressures on the SDWSRF (special)  
              for assistance issued as grants instead of loans.
              Increased exposure to potential loan defaults in the  
              millions of dollars to the SDWSRF by allowing loans to be  
              issued for the full cost of the project.

          Background: The Department of Public Health (DPH), under the  
          California Safe Drinking Water Act, administers grants and loans  
          from the SDWSRF to provide for the design and construction of  
          public water systems projects that will enable suppliers to meet  
          safe drinking water standards. Existing law requires DPH to  
          establish eligibility criteria within specified parameters and  
          to establish a priority list of proposed projects. Specifically,  
          between 15 and 30% of the SDWSRF may be expended for grants to  
          serve disadvantaged communities (HSC §116761.21). Existing law  
          also sets specific maximums for planning grants and construction  
          grants. 

          Proposed Law: This bill would declare that all small community  
          water systems or nontransient noncommunity water systems owned  
          by a public agency or a private not-for-profit water company  
          that serve a severely disadvantaged community to have no ability  
          to repay a loan, thereby allowing such systems to receive a  








          AB 118 (Comm. on Env. Safety and Toxic Materials)
          Page 1


          grant instead of a loan from the SDWSRF. 

          This bill would also allow an applicant to receive up to the  
          full cost of a project in the form of a loan bearing interest  
          subject to the availability of funds and the applicant's ability  
          to repay. 

          Related Legislation: This bill has similar provisions to the  
          August 6, 2012 version of AB 2529 (Wieckowski, 2012). AB 2529  
          was subsequently amended to address an unrelated matter.

          Staff Comments: This bill makes it easier for DPH to issue  
          grants instead of loans by automatically declaring that water  
          systems serving a severely disadvantaged community as having no  
          ability to repay a loan. While the amount of the SDWSRF that may  
          be given out as a loan is capped by federal and state law, this  
          provision would increase the likelihood that that cap is  
          reached, creating a cost pressure. Since a small water system  
          serving a severely disadvantaged community is likely to qualify  
          for a grant instead of a loan without this bill, this additional  
          cost pressure caused by this bill may be minimal. Staff notes  
          that since the SDWSRF largely operates as a revolving fund, any  
          financial assistance in the form of grants instead of loans  
          results in foregone future revenue to the SDWSRF.

          This bill would allow DPH to issue loans much greater than the  
          $20 million limit under existing law, if funds are available.  
          While DPH reviews the applicant's ability to repay the loan, by  
          increasing the loan size, the state is exposed to more a more  
          costly potential default. Staff notes that there are only a few  
          projects that could utilize substantially more than $20 million  
          and that DPH has never experienced a default.