BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �



                                                                  AB 120
                                                                  Page 1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 120 (Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee)
          As Introduced  January 14, 2013
          Majority vote 

           ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY          7-0                    
          APPROPRIATIONS      17-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Alejo, Dahle, Bloom,      |Ayes:|Gatto, Harkey, Bigelow,   |
          |     |Donnelly, Perea, Stone,   |     |Bocanegra, Bradford, Ian  |
          |     |Ting                      |     |Calderon, Campos,         |
          |     |                          |     |Donnelly, Eggman, Gomez,  |
          |     |                          |     |Hall, Ammiano, Linder,    |
          |     |                          |     |Pan, Quirk, Wagner, Weber |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Modifies eligibility requirements for the School  
          District Account (SDA), within the Underground Storage Tank  
          Cleanup Fund (UST Fund).  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Requires the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to  
            waive the permit requirement for applicants to the SDA, if  
            certain requirements are met.  

          2)Requires, as a condition of eligibility for a permit waiver,  
            the superintendent of the school district receiving funds from  
            the SDA to certify that petroleum was not delivered on or  
            after January 1, 2003, or that the tank was removed prior to  
            January 1, 2003.  

           EXISTING LAW  :  

          Under the Barry Keene Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Trust  
          Fund Act of 1989:

          1)Creates the UST Fund in the State Treasury for expenditure by  
            the SWRCB, upon appropriation by the Legislature.  Specifies  
            fees, interest and penalties that are required to be deposited  
            into the UST Fund.  Provides that an owner or operator of an  
            UST, as specified, who is required to perform corrective  
            action on a leaking UST, may apply to the SWRBC for  
            satisfaction of a claim.  Provides that the SWRCB may pay the  
            claim.   








                                                                  AB 120
                                                                  Page 2



          2)Creates the SDA in the UST Fund, for expenditure by the SWRCB,  
            to pay a claim filed by a school district based on a specified  
            priority schedule.  Transfers ten million dollars  
            ($10,000,000) per year, in the 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12  
            fiscal years, from the UST Fund to the SDA, for expenditure,  
            upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the payment of  
            claims filed by a school district.

          3)Requires that to be eligible for a claim payment, the claimant  
            must have complied with the permit requirements of Underground  
            Storage of Hazardous Substances statute.  Provides that all  
            claimants who file their claim on or after January 1, 2008, as  
            specified, may seek a waiver of the requirement to obtain a  
            permit.  Requires the SWRCB to waive the permit requirements  
            as a condition for payment from the UST Fund if it makes  
            specified findings, including that the claimant was unaware of  
            the permit requirement (HSC Section 25299.57).   

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, the expansion of school district eligibility will  
          increase reimbursement from the SDA, potentially in the millions  
          of dollars from the SDA Fund.  The bill would further result in  
          minor, absorbable costs for administering the program.  

           COMMENTS  :   

           Leaking underground storage tanks  .  According to the SWRCB,  
          leaking underground storage tanks are a significant source of  
          petroleum impacts to groundwater and may pose the following  
          potential threats to public health and safety:  exposure from  
          impacts to soil and/or groundwater; contamination of drinking  
          water aquifers; contamination of public or private drinking  
          water wells; and, inhalation of vapors.

           Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund  .  The SWRCB states that  
          the Barry Keene Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Trust Fund Act  
          of 1989 (commencing with section 25299.10 of the HSC), created  
          the UST Fund to help eligible owners and operators of petroleum  
          USTs to meet federal and state requirements to demonstrate  
          financial responsibility by providing coverage to pay for the  
          costs of cleanup and third party liability caused by an  
          unauthorized release of petroleum from a UST; to provide  
          financial assistance by reimbursing costs of cleanup for  








                                                                  AB 120
                                                                  Page 3


          unauthorized releases from petroleum USTs; and, to provide  
          reimbursement for damages awarded to third parties who are  
          injured by unauthorized releases of petroleum from USTs.

          The UST Fund reimburses eligible claimants for eligible,  
          incurred corrective action costs.  Corrective action costs  
          include preliminary site assessment, soil and water  
          investigation, corrective action plan implementation, and  
          verification monitoring after the cleanup is completed.

           School District Account (SDA)  .  AB 2729 (Ruskin) Chapter 644,  
          Statutes of 2008, created the SDA within the UST Fund.  The bill  
          transferred from the UST Fund to the SDA a sum of $10 million  
          per year in fiscal years 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12, to pay  
          for claims filed by school districts.  As of December 2, 2012,  
          the SDA carried a balance of $14,339,161.

           School districts and permitting requirements  .  Supporters of the  
          bill argue that many school districts are ineligible for SDA  
          funds because they cannot comply with the UST Fund permit  
          requirement.  Many districts have antiquated tanks, and through  
          staff turnover, facility changes and lack of recordkeeping over  
          time (all common at school districts), they have failed to  
          maintain current permits on their unused tanks.  Additionally,  
          these school districts are often ineligible for the existing UST  
          Fund permit requirement exception and waivers because the school  
          districts are deemed to have knowledge of the tanks.  

          There are 700 reported fuel leaks at school district sites in  
          the State.  According to data supplied by the SWRCB, as of 2012,  
          267 school districts applied for funding through the SDA.  Of  
          these, 193 school district sites have been funded and 6 are on  
          the priority list waiting to be funded.  About 40 school  
          districts have been denied funding due to ineligibility.  The  
          SWRCB estimates that 25% of these later districts were denied  
          eligibility for being unable to comply with permitting  
          requirements and 48% were denied for more than one reason; the  
          inability to comply with permitting requirements most likely  
          being one of those reasons. 
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Bob Fredenburg / E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965 
                                                                 FN:  








                                                                  AB 120
                                                                  Page 4


                                                                 0000828