Amended in Senate June 14, 2013

Amended in Assembly May 13, 2013

Amended in Assembly May 6, 2013

Amended in Assembly April 10, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 140


Introduced by Assembly Member Dickinson

(Coauthor: Assembly Member Gatto)

January 17, 2013


An act to add Section 86 to the Probate Code, and to amend Section 15610.30 of, and to add Section 15610.70 to, the Welfare and Institutions Code, relating to undue influence.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 140, as amended, Dickinson. Undue influence.

Existing law provides that financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult occurs when, among other instances, a person or entity takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining, real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult by undue influence, as defined.

Existing law makes failing to report, or impeding or inhibiting a report of, among other things, financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult, in violation of certain reporting requirements a misdemeanor. Existing law also makes it a misdemeanor for any caretaker of an elder or dependent adult to violate any provision of law proscribing theft or embezzlement, with respect to the property of that elder or dependent adult.

This bill would change the definition of undue influence to mean excessive persuasion that causes another person to act or refrain from acting and results in inequity. The bill would require, in determining whether the result was produced by undue influence, the vulnerability of the victim, the influencer’s apparentbegin delete authority and whether the influencer knew or should have known of the victim’s vulnerability,end deletebegin insert authority,end insert the actions or tactics used by the influencer, and the equity of the result to be considered. The bill would specify thatbegin delete nothing in these provisions be construed to imply thatend delete an inequitable result, without more,begin delete will constitute undue influence or excessive persuasion.end deletebegin insert is not sufficient to prove undue influence.end insert

By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

Existing law prohibits the use of undue influence and establishes protections for individuals unable to resist undue influence in various areas of the law, including wills, trusts, and conservatorships.

This bill would define undue influence for those purposes without superseding or interfering with the common law of undue influence.

The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

Section 86 is added to the Probate Code, to read:

2

86.  

“Undue influence” has the same meaning as defined in
3Section 15610.70 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. It is the
4intent of the Legislature that this section supplement the common
5law meaning of undue influence without superseding or interfering
6with the operation of that law.

7

SEC. 2.  

Section 15610.30 of the Welfare and Institutions Code
8 is amended to read:

9

15610.30.  

(a) “Financial abuse” of an elder or dependent adult
10occurs when a person or entity does any of the following:

P3    1(1) Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains real or
2personal property of an elder or dependent adult for a wrongful
3use or with intent to defraud, or both.

4(2) Assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or
5retaining real or personal property of an elder or dependent adult
6for a wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both.

7(3) Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists
8in taking, secreting, appropriating, obtaining, or retaining, real or
9personal property of an elder or dependent adult by undue
10influence, as defined in Section 15610.70.

11(b) A person or entity shall be deemed to have taken, secreted,
12appropriated, obtained, or retained property for a wrongful use if,
13among other things, the person or entity takes, secretes,
14appropriates, obtains, or retains the property and the person or
15entity knew or should have known that this conduct is likely to be
16harmful to the elder or dependent adult.

17(c) For purposes of this section, a person or entity takes, secretes,
18appropriates, obtains, or retains real or personal property when an
19elder or dependent adult is deprived of any property right, including
20by means of an agreement, donative transfer, or testamentary
21bequest, regardless of whether the property is held directly or by
22a representative of an elder or dependent adult.

23(d) For purposes of this section, “representative” means a person
24or entity that is either of the following:

25(1) A conservator, trustee, or other representative of the estate
26of an elder or dependent adult.

27(2) An attorney-in-fact of an elder or dependent adult who acts
28within the authority of the power of attorney.

29

SEC. 3.  

Section 15610.70 is added to the Welfare and
30Institutions Code
, to read:

31

15610.70.  

(a) “Undue influence” means excessive persuasion
32that causes another person to act or refrain from acting and results
33in inequity. In determining whether a result was produced by undue
34influence, all of the following shall be considered:

35(1) The vulnerability of thebegin delete victim, including,end deletebegin insert victim. Evidence
36ofend insert
begin insert vulnerability may include,end insert butbegin insert isend insert not limited to, incapacity,
37illness, disability, injury, age, education, impaired cognitive
38function, emotional distress, isolation, orbegin delete dependency.end deletebegin insert dependency,
39and whether the influencer knew or should have known of the
40alleged victim’s vulnerability.end insert

P4    1(2) The influencer’s apparentbegin delete authority, including,end deletebegin insert authority.
2Evidence of apparent authority may include,end insert
butbegin insert isend insert not limited to,
3status as a fiduciary, family member, care provider, health care
4professional, legal professional, spiritual adviser, expert, or other
5begin delete qualification, and whether the influencer knew or should have
6known of the victim’s vulnerability.end delete
begin insert qualification.end insert

7(3) The actions or tactics used by thebegin delete influencer, including,end delete
8begin insert influencer. Evidence of actions or tactics used may include,end insert butbegin insert is end insert
9 not limited to,begin delete controlling necessaries,end deletebegin insert all of the following:end insert

10begin insert(A)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertControlling necessaries of life,end insert medication, the victim’s
11interactions with others,begin delete orend delete access to information,begin delete sleep
12deprivation,end delete
begin deleteuseend deletebegin insert or sleep.end insert

13begin insert(B)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertUseend insert of affection, intimidation, orbegin delete coercion, initiationend delete
14begin insert coercion.end insert

15begin insert(C)end insertbegin insertend insertbegin insertInitiationend insert of changes in personal or property rights, use of
16haste or secrecy in effecting those changes, effecting changes at
17inappropriate times and places,begin delete orend deletebegin insert andend insert claims of expertise in
18effecting changes.

19(4) The equity of thebegin delete result, including,end deletebegin insert result. Evidence of the
20equity of the result may include,end insert
butbegin insert isend insert not limited to, the economic
21consequences to the victim, any divergence from the victim’s prior
22intent or course of conduct or dealing, the relationship of the value
23conveyed to the value of any services or consideration received,
24or the appropriateness of the change in light of the length and
25nature of the relationship.

26(b) begin deleteThis section shall not be construed to imply that end deletebegin insertEend insertbegin insertvidence
27of end insert
an inequitable result, without more,begin delete establishes the element of
28undue influence or excessive persuasion.end delete
begin insert is not sufficient to proveend insert
29begin insert undue influence.end insert

30

SEC. 4.  

No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
31Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because
32the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school
33district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or
34infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty
35for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of
36the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within
37the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
38Constitution.



O

    95