BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    Ó




                     SENATE GOVERNANCE & FINANCE COMMITTEE
                            Senator Lois Wolk, Chair
          

          BILL NO:  AB 143                      HEARING:  8/14/13
          AUTHOR:  Holden                       FISCAL:  Yes
          VERSION:  4/8/13                      TAX LEVY:  Yes
          CONSULTANT:  Grinnell                 

               USE TAX EXEMPTION: NATIONAL GUARD: TRANSFER ORDERS
          

          Provides a use tax exemption for property purchased by a  
          qualified service member transferred to California.


                           Background and Existing Law  

          California provides various tax credits designed to provide  
          incentives for tax-payers that incur certain expenses, such  
          as child adoption, or to influence behavior, including  
          business practices and decisions, such as research and  
          development credits.  The Legislature typically enacts such  
          tax incentives to encourage taxpayers to do something, but  
          for the tax credit, they would not otherwise do.

          State law imposes the sales tax on every retailer "engaged  
          in business in this state" that sells tangible personal  
          property to collect the appropriate tax from the purchase  
          and remit the amount to the Board of Equalization (BOE).   
          Unless the person pays the sales tax to the retailer, he or  
          she is liable for the use tax, which is imposed on any  
          person consuming tangible personal property in the state.   
          The use tax is the same rate as the sales tax, and must be  
          remitted on or before the last day of the month following  
          the quarterly period in which the person made the purchase.  
           The Legislature added the use tax in 1935 in response to  
          complaints from in-state retailers that California  
          residents would evade the sales tax it enacted in 1933 by  
          purchasing property out-of-state but use it here.

          Generally, when a California resident purchases tangible  
          personal property in another state, the obligation rests on  
          the consumer to remit the use tax due.  Californians may  
          remit the use tax directly to BOE, or on the income tax  
          form (SB 858, Committee on Budget, 2010).  

          State law contains some exemptions for use taxes based on  




          AB 143 - 4/8/13 -- Page 2



          when the property entered the state, and where its first  
          use takes place.  State law presumes that the use tax  
          applies whenever the property's first use occurs within the  
          state, or if the taxpayer brings the property into the  
          state within 90 days of purchase.  If neither condition is  
          met, the property is not subject to use tax.  Additionally,  
          if the taxpayer paid the sales tax to a retailer in another  
          state for the property, he or she need only pay the  
          difference between tax paid and the amount applied under  
          California law.  

          State law treats vehicles slightly differently: if a  
          California resident brings a vehicle into the state within  
          the first year after purchase, and registers it, the law  
          presumes that the use tax applies (SB 1100, Committee on  
          Budget, 2004).  Nonresidents storing or using the vehicle  
          in the state more than half the time of the one year period  
          following the sale also are presumed to be subject to tax.   
          Taxpayers may rebut the presumption.  However, members of  
          the armed services who purchase a vehicle prior to the  
          effective date of discharge are only subject to use tax if  
          he or she intended to use it in this state, and not  
          pursuant to official orders transferring him or her to this  
          state.


                                   Proposed Law  

          Assembly Bill 143 exempts from the use tax property  
          purchased by a qualified active duty or reserve member of  
          the armed forces or National Guard, or his or her spouse or  
          registered domestic partner, outside the state and prior to  
          the report date on official orders transferring the  
          qualified service member to the state.  The bill does not  
          affect state law guiding use taxes on vehicles.  

          The measure provides definitions for its terms, contains a  
          waiver for reimbursing any revenue loss to local agencies  
          imposing a sales or use tax, and sunsets the measure on  
          January 1, 2019.  


                               State Revenue Impact
           
          BOE estimates negligible revenue effects.






          AB 143 - 4/8/13 -- Page 3




                                     Comments  

          1.   Purpose of the bill  .  According to the author, "Our  
          brave men and women in the Armed Forces sacrifice every day  
          to protect and defend the United States of America.  In the  
          recent two wars, over two million American military  
          personnel have been called to serve in Afghanistan and  
          Iraq, and more than 40 percent of them have been deployed  
          more than once.  California is home to 12.9% of the active  
          duty members stationed in the United States.  Under current  
          law, any purchases by an active duty member of the military  
          from an out-of-state retailer would be subjected to Use  
          Tax, if the military member were to be redeployed to  
          California within three months of the purchase.  AB 143  
          would exempt active military members who are transferring  
          into California on official military business.  It is  
          commonsense legislation that will alleviate the unnecessary  
          tax burden on our active military members."
          2.   Yes, but  .  AB 143 adds an exemption from the use tax on  
          property purchased by members of the armed services  
          transferred to California.  However, the measure will  
          neither affect a large amount of property nor tax.   
          Existing law already exempts property purchased more than  
          90 days before the service member enters the state, and  
          allows the taxpayer to subtract from use tax due any sales  
          tax paid to a retailer in another state.  Additionally,  
          while service members transferred into the state due to  
          official orders may face rough treatment under current law,  
          AB 143 may invite future attempts to loosen the application  
          of the use tax for other individuals.  For example,  
          taxpayers transferred by their public or private employers  
          to the state to work here can make a similar case that  
          current law taxes property that they bought out-of-state  
          but never intended on using in California.  The Committee  
          may wish to consider the reasons for extending special  
          treatment for this population given its limited  
          application, and the possibility that other sets of  
          individuals may ask for a similar benefit.


                                 Assembly Actions  

          Assembly Revenue and Taxation 9-0
          Assembly Appropriations            17-0
          Assembly Floor                77-0





          AB 143 - 4/8/13 -- Page 4





                        Support and Opposition (08/08/13)

           Support  :  BOE Member George Runner; American Legion -  
          Department of California; AMVETS - Department of  
          California; California Association of County Veterans  
          Service Officers; California State Commanders Veterans  
          Council; VFW - Department of California; California State  
          Council Vietnam Veterans of America - California State  
          Council; and Veterans Democratic Club of Sacramento County.

           Opposition  :  Unknown.