Amended in Assembly May 24, 2013

Amended in Assembly April 22, 2013

Amended in Assembly April 9, 2013

California Legislature—2013–14 Regular Session

Assembly BillNo. 147


Introduced by Assembly Member V. Manuel Pérez

(Principal coauthor: Senator Hueso)

January 18, 2013


An actbegin delete to amend Section 2932 of the Fish and Game Code, andend delete to add Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 42750) to Part 4 of Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to the environment.

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 147, as amended, V. Manuel Pérez. Environment: Salton Sea: dust mitigation.

begin delete

Existing law establishes the Salton Sea Restoration Fund that is administered by the Director of Fish and Game and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, used for the restoration of the Salton Sea.

end delete

Existing law implements the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA), which was entered into by various parties to budget their portions of California’s apportionment of Colorado River water and to provide a framework for conservation measures and water transfers for a period of up to 75 years. Existing law provides for a framework to mitigate the environmental impacts on the Salton Sea caused by the QSA water transfer. Existing law authorizes the Department of Fish and Wildlife to enter into a joint powers agreement with specified local agencies to establish a joint powers authority for the purposes of providing for the payment of costs for environmental mitigation requirements.

This bill would require the State Air Resources Board, upon the execution of an agreement with the joint powers authority, to evaluate and determine with the air quality planning completed by the authority is sufficient to mitigate the air quality impacts of the QSA. In the event that the state board concludes that additional mitigation measures are needed, the bill would require the state board to submit recommendation to the authority.begin delete The bill would authorize moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be expended by the state board for the above purposes.end delete

Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

P2    1

SECTION 1.  

(a)  The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:

3(1) The Salton Sea is California’s largest lake, covering
4begin insert approximatelyend insert 365 square miles, and it serves as an important stop
5on the annual Pacific Flyway migratory route, supporting over 400
6species of birds and representing over two-thirds of all birds in the
7continental United States.

8(2) The Salton Sea is located in the Imperial Valley and
9Coachella Valley of southern California and rests in close
10proximity to thousands of residents.

11(3) In 2003, the Legislature enacted statutes (Chapters 611, 612,
12and 613 of the Statutes of 2003) to facilitate the execution and
13implementation of the Quantification Settlement Agreement (QSA)
14and related agreements, including a transfer of conserved water
15from the Imperial Irrigation District to the San Diego Water
16Authority. As part of those statutes, the Legislature declared its
17intent that the State of California undertake the restoration of the
18Salton Sea ecosystem and the permanent protection of wildlife
19dependent on the ecosystem.

20(4) Implementation of the water transfer from the Imperial
21Irrigation District to the San Diego Water Authority will reduce
22 agricultural drainage inflow to the Salton Sea, reducing the sea’s
23depth and result in the exposure of currently submerged sea
24lakebed.

25(5) The exposure of previously submerged sea lakebed has the
26potential to significantly increase fugitive dust emissions for
P3    1particulate matter of 10 or less microns in diameter (PM10) as
2winds blow across exposed lakebed eroded fine-grained sediments
3and salts, lofting them into the air.

begin delete

4(6) At Owens Lake, a lake drained by the Los Angeles
5Department of Water and Power, the cost of mitigation fugitive
6dust emissions arising from the exposed lakebed has reached
7$1,200,000,000.

end delete
begin insert

8(6) Experience mitigating particulate matter emissions at other
9exposed lakebeds has proved to be costly and has demonstrated
10the need to have a proactive approach to mitigation that stresses
11control measures over monitoring activities and includes a strong
12adaptive management platform.

end insert

13(7) As part of the Quantification Settlement Agreement, the
14state entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (QSA-JPA) for
15purposes of financing the mitigation of the environmental impacts
16resulting from the QSA. The parties of the QSA-JPA include the
17State of California acting by and through the Department of Fish
18and Wildlife, the Coachella Valley Water District, the Imperial
19Irrigation District, and the San Diego County Water Authority.

20(8) Under the QSA-JPA, the nonstate member agencies are
21liable for the cost of mitigating the environmental impacts of the
22QSA up to the first $133 million. The QSA-JPA nonstate member
23agencies have spent a considerable amount of time and resources
24developing plans to meet this obligation.

25(9) Under Section 9.2 of the QSA-JPA, the state agreed to “an
26unconditional contractual obligation” to pay for the cost of
27mitigating the environmental impact of the QSA above the first
28$133 million in costs.

29(b) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this measure,
30to have the State Air Resources Board evaluate the air quality
31begin delete planning completedend deletebegin insert mitigation developedend insert by the Joint Powers
32Authority established by QSA-JPA begin delete to determine if it is sufficient
33to mitigate the air quality impacts of the QSA and ensure that when
34the state assumes liability over mitigating the environmental
35impacts of the QSA that the air quality mitigation work completed
36by the authority continue uninterruptedend delete
.

begin delete
37

SEC. 2.  

Section 2932 of the Fish and Game Code is amended
38to read:

39

2932.  

There is hereby established the Salton Sea Restoration
40Fund which shall be administered by the director. Money deposited
P4    1in the fund shall be expended, upon appropriation by the
2Legislature, for the following purposes:

3(a) Environmental and engineering studies related to the
4restoration of the Salton Sea and the protection of fish and wildlife
5dependent on the sea.

6(b) (1) Air quality evaluations conducted by the State Air
7Resources Board for purposes of providing the joint powers
8authority established pursuant to Chapter 613 of the Statutes of
92003 with guidance on how to appropriately mitigate the air quality
10impacts resulting from the Quantification Settlement Agreement.

11(2) For the purposes of this subdivision, “Quantification
12Settlement Agreement” has the same meaning as defined in
13subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Chapter 617 of the Statutes of 2002.

14(c) Implementation of conservation measures necessary to
15protect the fish and wildlife species dependent on the Salton Sea,
16including adaptive management measurements pursuant to Section
172081.7. These conservation measures shall be limited to the Salton
18Sea and lower Colorado River ecosystems, including the Colorado
19River Delta.

20(d) Implementation of the preferred Salton Sea restoration
21alternative.

22(e) Administrative, technical, and public outreach costs related
23to the development and selection of the preferred Salton Sea
24restoration alternative.

end delete
25

begin deleteSEC. 3.end delete
26begin insertSEC. 2.end insert  

Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 42750) is added
27to Part 4 of Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:

28 

29Chapter  6. Salton Sea Dust Mitigation
30

 

31

42750.  

Unless the context requires otherwise, as used in this
32chapter, the following terms mean the following:

33(a) “Air districts” means the Imperial County Air Pollution
34Control District and South Coast Air Quality Management District.

35(b) “Authority” means thebegin insert water transferend insert joint powers authority
36established pursuant to an agreement entered into pursuant to
37Chapter 613 of the Statutes of 2003.

38(c) “County” means either of the following:

39(1) The County of Riverside.

40(2) The County of Imperial.

P5    1(d) “Quantification Settlement Agreement” has the same
2meaning as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 1 of Chapter 617
3of the Statutes of 2002.

4(e) “Valley” means either of the following:

5(1) The Imperial Valley.

6(2) The Coachella Valley.

7

42751.  

(a) Upon the execution of an agreement between the
8state board and the authority for purposes of compiling the air
9quality mitigation planning completed by the authority, the state
10board shall evaluate and determine if the air quality planning
11completed by the authority is sufficient to mitigate the air quality
12impacts of the Quantification Settlement Agreement.

begin delete

13(b) In determining if the authority’s air quality planning is
14adequate to mitigate the air quality impacts of the Quantification
15Settlement Agreement, the state board shall evaluate all of the
16following:

17(1) The quantified current and projected exposed sea lake bed
18arising from the Quantification Settlement Agreement.

19(2) The quantified current and projected exposed sea lake bed
20arising from factors other than the Quantification Settlement
21Agreement.

22(3) The profiled Salton Sea lake bed aerosols, given chemicals
23that have historically drained into the sea from both agricultural
24runoff and water coming from Mexico over the New River,
25including Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane or “DDT.”

26(4) The prioritization of mitigation measures that can be
27instituted at the sea to enable both valleys to meet National
28Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter, including
29the applicability of measures used to mitigate ambient dust
30pollution at Owens Lake.

31(c) (1)

end delete

32begin insert(b)end insert To the extent the state board concludes additional mitigation
33planning needs to take place to mitigate the air quality impacts of
34the Quantification Settlement Agreement, the state board shall
35submit recommendations to the authority.

begin delete

36(2) To the extent the state board recommends to the authority
37additional planning work that needs to be completed pursuant to
38paragraph (1), the state board shall make recommendations in a
39manner to minimize costs on the authority, including both of the
40following:

end delete
begin delete

P6    1(A) The appropriate agencies or departments with whom the
2authority may work, including the air districts for purposes of
3accessing work the air districts have already completed as part of
4their state implementation plan planning activities.

end delete
begin delete

5(B) The appropriate number, model, and placement of air quality
6monitors in the Salton Sea basin to ensure aerosols arising from
7the sea are properly monitored.

end delete
begin delete

8(d)

end delete

9begin insert(end insertbegin insertc)end insert This section does not modify existing roles, responsibilities,
10or liabilities of the State of California, the County of Imperial, the
11County of Riverside, or any other governmental agency, under the
12Quantification Settlement Agreement.

begin delete

13(e) Moneys in the Salton Sea Restoration Fund shall, upon
14appropriation by the Legislature, be expended by the state board
15for purposes of this chapter.

end delete


O

    96