AB 153, as amended, Bonilla. California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: offsets.
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the State Air Resources Board to adopt regulations to require the reporting and verification of emissions of greenhouse gases and to monitor and enforce compliance with the reporting and verification program, and requires the state board to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020. The act requires the state board to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions. The act authorizes the state board to include the use of market-based compliance mechanisms.
This bill, if the state board uses its authority to include the use of market-based compliance mechanisms, would require the
state board, on or before January 1,begin delete 2014end deletebegin insert 2015end insert, to adopt a specified process for the review and consideration of new offset protocols and, commencing in 2014 and continuing annually thereafter, use that process to review and consider new offset protocols.begin insert The bill would require the state board to adopt guidelines and incentives that prioritize the approval of specified offset protocols. end insertbegin insertThe bill would require the state board to submit a specified annual report to the Legislature.end insert
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the
2following:
3(a) The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
4(Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health
5and Safety Code) requires the state to reduce greenhouse gas
6emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
7(b) On October 20, 2011, the State Air Resources Board adopted
8the final cap-and-trade regulation pursuant to the act, to become
9effective January 1, 2012, as required by that act, and also adopted
10Resolution 11-32 to require that its executive officer develop
11implementation documents laying out the process for the
review
12and consideration of new offset protocols.
13(c) The cap-and-trade regulation is part of the state’s global
14warming scoping plan and is intended to provide covered entities
15under the act the flexibility to seek out and implement the
16lowest-cost options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and will
17provide an estimated 20 percent of the emissions reductions
18required to achieve 1990 emission levels by 2020, as required by
19the act.
20(d) The cap-and-trade regulation allows offset credits to be used
21as a means by which parties subject to the regulation can lower
22their cost to comply with the regulation while still ensuring a
23reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and caps the use of offset
24credits at no more than 8 percent of a covered entity’s compliance
25obligation.
26(e) The State Air Resources Board has adopted four compliance
27offset protocols for use in the United States that can be used to
28certify high-quality offset credits that are additional, real,
29permanent, quantifiable, verifiable, and enforceable as required
30by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006:
31Livestock Manure projects, Urban Forests projects, Ozone
32Depleting Substances Destruction projects, and Forests projects.
P3 1(f) While a state comprehensive offset protocol review process
2would provide more certainty for carbon dioxide offset suppliers
3and purchasers to invest in environmentally worthwhile projects
4that meet certain criteria under the California Global Warming
5Solutions Act of 2006, it is the intent of the Legislature that only
6high-quality offset credits that
represent rigorously evaluated offset
7protocols and that meet the statutory requirements of the act be
8allowed for compliance with the cap-and-trade regulation.
Part 8 (commencing with Section 38600) is added to
10Division 25.5 of the Health and Safety Code, to read:
11
(a) On or before January 1,begin delete 2014end deletebegin insert 2015end insert, if the state
15board has exercised its authority pursuant to subdivision (a) of
16Section 38570, the state board, in accordance with Section 38571,
17shall adopt a process for the review and consideration of new offset
18protocols. The process shall include, but not be limited to, all of
19the following:
20(1) A schedule, to be posted on the state board’s Internet Web
21site, that depicts the timeline for review and consideration of new
22offset protocols by the state board. This
schedule shall be updated
23regularly and at least annually.
24(2) An online tracking system that will allow the public to track
25the progress of new offset protocols under review and consideration
26by the state board.
27(3) A point of contact at the state board for entities interested
28in the process of review and consideration of new offset protocols
29by the state board.
30(4)
end delete
31begin insert(3)end insert An explanation of how the
review and consideration process
32will accommodate public input and comments on new offset
33protocols under consideration.
34(5)
end delete
35begin insert(4)end insert An explanation of the criteria used for consideration of new
36offset protocols, including, but not limited to, a description of the
37standards for protocol approval, rejection, and delay. This
38description also shall include, to the extent feasible, a description
39of the social, environmental, and financial impacts analysis used
P4 1in making offset protocol decisions as well as an estimate of
2potential supply and expected development costs.
3(b) Commencing in 2014, and continuing annually thereafter,
4if the state board has exercised its authority pursuant to subdivision
5(a) of Section 38570, the state board shall use the process adopted
6pursuant to subdivision (a) to review and consider new offset
7protocols.
8(c) The state board shall establish incentives and guidelines
9that prioritize the approval of offset protocols, in the following
10order, that result in the following:
11(1) The creation of green jobs in the state and the
reduction of
12greenhouse gas emissions in the state.
13(2) Air quality benefits in California communities
14disproportionately impacted by air pollution, as determined by
15the state board.
16(3) Cobenefits to public health and the environment anywhere
17in the state.
18(d) (1) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the Government
19Code, the state board shall submit to the appropriate committees
20of the Legislature an annual report on the status of the offset
21supply.
22(2) A report to be submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be
23
submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government
24Code.
O
98