BILL ANALYSIS �
AB 157
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 17, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 157 (Campos) - As Amended: April 8, 2013
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:9-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill adds false impersonation to the list of activities for
which the court may issue a protective order under the Domestic
Violence Protection Act.
FISCAL EFFECT
Minor absorbable costs for the Judicial Council to amend a form
and revise a rule of court.
COMMENTS
Purpose . Current law allows a court to issue a domestic violence
protective order enjoining a party from molesting, attacking,
striking, stalking, threatening, sexually assaulting, battering,
harassing, and other specified behaviors. The growth of social
media and online communications, while providing great benefits
to society, has also provided a new avenue for domestic abuse.
Batterers can, with relative ease, impersonate their victims in
an effort to further abuse them. AB 157, therefore, adds false
impersonation to the list of activities that may be enjoined
under a protective order.
The first case prosecuted under California's cyberstalking law
provides a chilling example of the harm that can be done through
false impersonation and the need for protection against this
type of abuse. According the U.S. Attorney General's account of
the crime, the batterer impersonated a woman who had rejected
his romantic advances and posted on Internet bulletin boards and
chat rooms that she fantasized about being raped. He also posted
her address and phone number. According to the account, men
knocked on the woman's door at least six times saying they
AB 157
Page 2
wanted to rape her. This batterer was convicted of his crime,
but AB 157 is intended to better protect victims by preventing
this type of domestic abuse before it occurs.
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081