AB 162, as amended, Holden. Wireless telecommunications facilities.
The Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, and open space. Existing law, the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, prohibits a state or local government from denying an eligible facilities request, as defined, for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the tower or base station.
This bill would prohibit a local government from denying an eligible facilities request, as defined, for a modification of an existing wireless telecommunications facilitybegin insert or structureend insert that does not
substantially change the physical dimensions of the wireless telecommunications facilitybegin insert or structureend insert, as specified. The bill would require a local government to act on an eligible facilities request withinbegin delete 45end deletebegin insert 90end insert days of receipt of a request, as specified. The bill would prohibit a local government from requiring proof of gap in coverage as part of the approval of an eligible facilities request. By adding to the duties of a local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of
2the following:
3(a) Nearly one in every three Californians communicates only
4via a cellular device and does not own or operate a landline
5telephone.
6(b) Of the 240,000,000 calls to telephone number 911 for
7emergency assistance placed nationwide each year, 70 percent
8now originate from cellular devices.
9(c) In 2010, 5 percent of all 911 calls originating from cellular
10
devices were dropped, resulting in 8,400,000 dropped 911 calls.
11(d) Recognizing the public’s shift toward cellular telephone use,
12the Legislature passed Senate Bill 1375 (Chapter 332 of the
13Statutes of 2010), authorizing telephone corporations to deactivate
14911 emergency service from any landline telephone not subscribing
15to paid telephone service.
16(e) Given the increased reliance on cellular phones, maintaining
17signal strength and call reliability for 911 calls from cellular
18telephones is critical to protecting public safety and saving lives
19of Californians.
20(f) The Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist
21Attacks Upon the United States (known as the 9/11 Commission
22Report) identified the lack of coordination among first responder
23agencies and communication challenges in the 9/11 attacks and
24emphasized
the need for uniform and reliable communications for
25all first responders.
P3 1(g) The federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
2of 2012 (Public Law 112-96) creates a framework for the public
3sector to partner with commercial providers to leverage the private
4sector’s investments in broadband technologies to efficiently deploy
5an interoperable broadband network for public safety.
6(h) The federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
7of 2012 (Public Law 112-96) allocated seven billion dollars
8($7,000,000,000) for grants to states to build the nationwide public
9safety broadband network.
10(i) The Federal Communications Commission has found that
11delays by local governments in approving ministerial requests
12have delayed the implementation of next-generation broadband
13services for consumers and first
responders.
14(j) It is the intent of the Legislature to increase network capacity
15on existing wireless structures in order to serve the needs of safety
16personnel and the people of the state.
Section 65964.5 is added to the Government Code, to
19read:
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, and pursuant to
21Section 6409 of the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
22Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. Sec. 1455), a local government
23shall approve andbegin delete mayend deletebegin insert shallend insert not deny any eligible facilities request
24for a modification of an existing wireless telecommunications
25facilitybegin insert or structure end insert that does not substantially change the physical
26dimensions of the wireless telecommunications facilitybegin insert
or structureend insert.
27(b) The failure to act on an eligible facilities request withinbegin delete 45end delete
28begin insert 90 end insert days of receipt of a request shall be deemed an approval of the
29request. Thebegin delete 45end deletebegin insert 90end insert days shall be tolled if the request is determined
30to be incomplete. If the request is determined to be incomplete,
31the local government shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section
3265943 of the Government Code.
33(c) A local government
shall not require proof of gap in coverage
34as part of the approval of an eligible facilities request.
3 35(d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall
36apply:
37(1) “Collocation” means the mounting of the wireless
38telecommunications facility and related equipment on an existing
39tower, building, or structure for the purpose of transmitting or
40receiving signals for telecommunications or public safety services.
5 P4 1(1)
end delete
2begin insert(2)end insert “Eligible facilities request” or “request” means any request
3for modification of an existing wireless telecommunications facility
4begin insert
or collocation on an existing structure end insert that involves any of the
5following:
6(A) Collocation of upgraded transmission equipment.
7(B) Removal of transmission equipment.
8(C) Replacement of transmission equipment.
begin insert
9(D) Collocation and deployment of transmission equipment
10necessary to construct or maintain public safety broadband
11communication systems.
12(3) “Public safety broadband communications system” means
13any regional interoperable communications system, the nationwide
14public safety broadband network, the first responder analog-D
15block, or any other government-operated communications system
16used by first responders or emergency management systems.
11 17(2)
end delete18begin insert(4)end insert “Substantially change” means any of the following:
19(A) The mounting of the proposed antenna on the wireless
20telecommunications facilitybegin insert
or structureend insert
would increase the
21existing height of the wireless telecommunications facility by more
22than 10 percent, or by the height of one additional antenna array
23with separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20
24feet, whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed
25antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this subparagraph
26if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas.
27(B) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve the
28installation of more than the standard number of new equipment
29cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four equipment
30cabinets, or more than one additional equipment shelter.
31(C) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve adding
32an appurtenance to the body of the wireless
telecommunications
33facilitybegin insert
or structureend insert that would protrude from the edge of the
34wireless telecommunications facility more than 20 feet, or more
35than the width of the wireless telecommunications facility at the
36level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the
37mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set
38forth in this subparagraph if necessary to shelter the antenna from
39inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the wireless
40telecommunications facility via cable.
P5 1(D) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve
2excavation outside the current wireless telecommunications facility
3site, defined as the current boundaries of the leased or owned
4property surrounding the wireless telecommunications facility and
5any access or utility easements currently related to the site.
6(D) The eligible facility request fails to comply with all existing
7aesthetic requirements imposed by a local government for the
8specific facility subject to the request. Nothing in this section shall
9be construed to require that any new aesthetic enhancements to
10be made to an eligible facility that were not existing requirements
11at the time the eligible facility request was made.
39 12(3)
end delete
13begin insert(5)end insert “Wireless telecommunications facility” means equipment
14and network components, including towers, utility poles,
15transmitters, base stations, and emergency power
systems that are
16integral to providing wireless telecommunications services.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
19this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
20local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
21pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
224 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
O
97