AB 162,
as amended, Holden. Wirelessbegin delete telecommunications facilities.end deletebegin insert telecommunications: 911 emergency assistance.end insert
Existing law, the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, establishes a grant program to make grants to states to assist states and local jurisdictions to identify, plan, and implement the most efficient and effective way to utilize and integrate the infrastructure, equipment, and other architecture associated with the nationwide public safety broadband network to satisfy the wireless communications and data service needs of those jurisdictions.
end insertbegin insertThis bill would make legislative findings and declarations relating to the criticalness of maintaining signal strength and call reliability for 911 calls from cellular telephones, and would state the intent of the Legislature to subsequently amend this bill to include provisions that would increase network capacity on existing wireless structures in order to serve the needs of safety personnel and the people of the state.
end insertThe Planning and Zoning Law authorizes the legislative body of any county or city to adopt ordinances that, among other things, regulate the use of buildings, structures, and land as between industry, business, residences, and open space. Existing law, the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, prohibits a state or local government from denying an eligible facilities request, as defined, for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the tower or base station.
end deleteThis bill would prohibit a local government from denying an eligible facilities request, as defined, for a modification of an existing wireless telecommunications facility or structure that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the wireless telecommunications facility or structure, as specified. The bill would require a local government to act on an eligible facilities request within 90 days of receipt of a request, as specified. The bill would prohibit a local government from requiring proof of gap in coverage as part of the approval of an eligible facilities request. By adding to the duties of a local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
end deleteThe California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
end deleteThis bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
end deleteVote: majority.
Appropriation: no.
Fiscal committee: begin deleteyes end deletebegin insertnoend insert.
State-mandated local program: begin deleteyes end deletebegin insertnoend insert.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of
2the following:
3(a) Nearly one in every three Californians communicates only
4via a cellular device and does not own or operate a landline
5telephone.
6(b) Of the 240,000,000 calls to telephone number 911 for
7emergency assistance placed nationwide each year, 70 percent
8now originate from cellular devices.
9(c) In 2010, 5 percent of all 911 calls originating from cellular
10devices were dropped, resulting in 8,400,000 dropped 911 calls.
11(d) Recognizing the public’s shift toward cellular telephone use,
12the
Legislature passed Senate Bill 1375 (Chapter 332 of the Statutes
P3 1of 2010), authorizing telephone corporations to deactivate 911
2emergency service from any landline telephone not subscribing to
3paid telephone service.
4(e) Given the increased reliance on cellular phones, maintaining
5signal strength and call reliability for 911 calls from cellular
6telephones is critical to protecting public safety and saving lives
7of Californians.
8(f) The Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist
9Attacks Upon the United States (known as the 9/11 Commission
10Report) identified the lack of coordination among first responder
11agencies and communication challenges in the 9/11 attacks and
12emphasized the need for uniform and reliable communications for
13all first responders.
14(g) The federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
15
of 2012 (Public Law 112-96) creates a framework for the public
16sector to partner with commercial providers to leverage the private
17sector’s investments in broadband technologies to efficiently
18deploy an interoperable broadband network for public safety.
19begin delete(h)end deletebegin delete end deletebegin deleteThe federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act begin insertThat actend insertbegin insert end insertallocated seven billion
20of 2012 (Public Law 112-96) end delete
21dollars ($7,000,000,000) for grants to states to build the nationwide
22public safety broadband network.
23(i)
end delete
24begin insert(h)end insert The Federal Communications Commission has found that
25delays by local governments in approving ministerial requests have
26delayed the implementation of next-generation broadband services
27for consumers and first responders.
28(j)
end delete
29begin insert(i)end insert It is the intent of the Legislature tobegin insert subsequently amend this
30measure to include provisions that wouldend insert increase network capacity
31on existing wireless structures in order
to serve the needs of safety
32personnel and the people of the state.
begin deleteSection 65964.5 is added to the end deletebegin deleteGovernment Codeend deletebegin delete, to
34read:end delete
(a) Notwithstanding any other law, and pursuant to
36Section 6409 of the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
37Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. Sec. 1455), a local government
38shall approve and shall not deny any eligible facilities request for
39a modification of an existing wireless telecommunications facility
P4 1or structure that does not substantially change the physical
2dimensions of the wireless telecommunications facility or structure.
3(b) The failure to act on an eligible facilities request within 90
4days of receipt of a request shall be deemed an approval of the
5request. The 90 days shall be tolled if the request is determined to
6be incomplete. If the request is
determined to be incomplete, the
7local government shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section
865943 of the Government Code.
9(c) A local government shall not require proof of gap in coverage
10as part of the approval of an eligible facilities request.
11(d) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall
12apply:
13(1) “Collocation” means the mounting of the wireless
14telecommunications facility and related equipment on an existing
15tower, building, or structure for the purpose of transmitting or
16receiving signals for telecommunications or public safety services.
17(2) “Eligible facilities request” or “request” means any request
18for
modification of an existing wireless telecommunications facility
19
or collocation on an existing structure that involves any of the
20following:
21(A) Collocation of upgraded transmission equipment.
22(B) Removal of transmission equipment.
23(C) Replacement of transmission equipment.
24(D) Collocation and deployment of transmission equipment
25necessary to construct or maintain public safety broadband
26communication systems.
27(3) “Public safety broadband communications system” means
28any regional interoperable communications system, the nationwide
29public safety broadband network, the first responder analog-D
30block, or any other government-operated communications system
31used
by first responders or emergency management systems.
32(4) “Substantially change” means any of the following:
33(A) The mounting of the proposed antenna on the wireless
34telecommunications facility or structure would increase the existing
35height of the wireless telecommunications facility by more than
3610 percent, or by the height of one additional antenna array with
37separation from the nearest existing antenna not to exceed 20 feet,
38whichever is greater, except that the mounting of the proposed
39antenna may exceed the size limits set forth in this subparagraph
40if necessary to avoid interference with existing antennas.
P5 1(B) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve the
2installation of more than the standard number of new
equipment
3cabinets for the technology involved, not to exceed four equipment
4cabinets, or more than one additional equipment shelter.
5(C) The mounting of the proposed antenna would involve adding
6an appurtenance to the body of the wireless telecommunications
7facility or structure that would protrude from the edge of the
8wireless telecommunications facility more than 20 feet, or more
9than the width of the wireless telecommunications facility at the
10level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater, except that the
11mounting of the proposed antenna may exceed the size limits set
12forth in this subparagraph if necessary to shelter the antenna from
13inclement weather or to connect the antenna to the wireless
14telecommunications facility via cable.
15(D) The eligible facility request
fails to comply with all existing
16aesthetic requirements imposed by a local government for the
17specific facility subject to the request. Nothing in this section shall
18be construed to require that any new aesthetic enhancements to be
19made to an eligible facility that were not existing requirements at
20the time the eligible facility request was made.
21(5) “Wireless telecommunications facility” means equipment
22and network components, including towers, utility poles,
23transmitters, base stations, and emergency power systems that are
24integral to providing wireless telecommunications services.
If the Commission on State Mandates determines that
26this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to
27local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made
28pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division
294 of Title 2 of the Government Code.
30
CORRECTIONS:
Text--Page 4.
O
Corrected 5-16-13—See last page. 96