BILL ANALYSIS Ó AB 169 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 17, 2013 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Mike Gatto, Chair AB 169 (Dickinson) - As Amended: April 1, 2013 Policy Committee: Public Safety Vote: 5-2 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill explicitly limits the transfer or sale of unsafe handguns to those authorized to possess them, and applies unsafe handgun restrictions to single-shot pistols that can be easily modified to semi-automatic weapons. FISCAL EFFECT Minor nonreimbursable local costs for incarceration, offset to a degree by increased fine revenue, to the extent the misdemeanor penalty for selling or providing unsafe handguns is applied to additional cases. COMMENTS 1)Rationale. Current law specifies the sale, loan, or transfer of guns in most cases must be through a state licensed dealer or a local law enforcement agency. Current law also provides that unsafe handguns, as specified, may not be manufactured or sold in California. The Department of Justice (DOJ) is required to maintain a roster of unsafe handguns. Current law provides exemptions from the unsafe handgun law, including law enforcement officers, as defined, private parties where the weapon was previously owned, gunsmiths, curio dealers, pawnbrokers, and persons using the guns as a movie props. According to the author, "AB 169 closes a couple of loopholes in state law that, without correction, allow unsafe handguns to be easily transferred to individuals who are not trained to AB 169 Page 2 handle such weapons, or do not have a legitimate need to own such a weapon, or to be purchased by anyone if the weapon undergoes a simple modification that can be easily undone? "Unfortunately, there is nothing to prohibit any of these permitted persons to turn around and sell the guns to people who cannot make an original purchase. Another loophole allows anyone to buy an unsafe handgun if it is modified to fire only a single shot. But this modification can be easily undone." 2)The need for the limitation on sales and transfers to exempted persons is unclear as current law already prohibits the sale of unsafe handguns to persons not authorized to make such a purchase. Current law prohibiting sale or transfer of unsafe handguns to nonexempt persons does not exempt sale or transfer by law enforcement or military personnel to non-law enforcement or non-military personnel. 3)Prior Legislation . AB 2460 (Dickinson), 2012, was similar in that it prohibited specified law enforcement entities and officers from selling or transferring ownership of an unsafe handgun to any entity or person not otherwise exempted from possession of an unsafe handgun. AB 2460 was vetoed by the Gov. Brown, who stated, "This bill would restrict law enforcement and military personnel - and only those individuals - from selling lawfully purchased handguns that have not been certified by the Attorney General's Office. "This bill takes from law enforcement officers the right to an activity that remains legally available to every private citizen. I don't believe this is justified." This bill addresses the governor's stated concern by stating that any person exempt from the unsafe handgun provisions may only sell or transfer a gun to another exempt party. 4)Unsafe handguns . SB 15 (Polanco), Statutes of 1999, made it a misdemeanor for any person to manufacture, import for sale, offer for sale, give, or lend any unsafe handgun, as defined, with certain specific exceptions. SB 15 defined an unsafe handgun as one that a) does not have a requisite safety device; b) does not meet specified firing tests; and c) does not meet a specified drop safety test. 5)Support . According to the California Chapters of the Brady AB 169 Page 3 Campaign, "Most law enforcement personnel are exempt from the requirements of SB 15 (Safe Handgun Act). The need for this bill became clear when it came to light that certain members of the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department were engaging in the sale of unsafe handguns to persons who were not exempt as a profit making venture. This practice was a blatant violation of the intent of the Safe Handgun act and put unsafe handguns in the hands of the general public." 6)Opposition. The National Rifle Association contends this bill prohibits the transfer of millions of lawfully owned handguns. "Most of the handguns lawfully possessed in California today, are not currently or will ever be allowed, to be added to DOJ approved handgun roster. These handguns have fallen off the roster, were manufactured and/or purchased prior to the State's enactment of the handgun roster law. The passage AB 169 would leave gun owners who lawfully purchased a handgun that previously appeared on the DOJ approved roster with no means to sell or transfer their handgun, if that firearm is no longer listed on the roster." Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081