BILL ANALYSIS Ó
AB 176
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 1, 2013
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Mike Gatto, Chair
AB 176 (Campos) - As Amended: April 8, 2013
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:10
- 0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill requires police officers to enforce no-contact
restraining orders when there are multiple restraining orders
involving the same parties, and one of those orders is a
no-contact order.
FISCAL EFFECT
There are no significant costs associated with this legislation.
COMMENTS
Purpose . According to the author, this bill seeks to provide the
greatest protection to victims by requiring that in cases where
there are multiple and conflicting protective orders regarding
the same parties and one of those orders is a no-contact order,
a law enforcement officer must enforce the no-contact order.
This should help ensure that victims of domestic violence, who
are protected by multiple protective orders, receive the
protections ordered by the court. If none of the orders forbid
contact, then enforcement priority continues as under current
law.
Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916)
319-2081
AB 176
Page 2