BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    �






           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE       BILL NO: ab 178
          SENATOR MARK DESAULNIER, CHAIRMAN              AUTHOR:  Beth Gaines
                                                         VERSION: 1/24/13
          Analysis by:  Mark Stivers                     FISCAL:  yes
          Hearing date:  June 4, 2013



          SUBJECT:

          Business logo signs

          DESCRIPTION:

          This bill requires the Department of Transportation to allow the  
          placement of business logo signs in an urban area with a  
          population 50,000 or less if the urban area has had a highway  
          bypass completed since 2002.

          ANALYSIS:

          Pursuant to existing law, the Department of Transportation  
          (Caltrans) administers the Business Logo Signing Program to  
          place information signs identifying specific roadside businesses  
          offering fuel, food, lodging, camping services, approved 24-hour  
          pharmacy services, or approved attractions near exits on  
          freeways located in rural areas.  Any business whose primary and  
          principal source of revenue is the sale of goods, products, or  
          services that fall within the service categories and that meets  
          criteria established in regulation may participate in the  
          program.  Caltrans charges per logo a $100 annual permit fee, a  
          $250 annual rental fee, and additional installation and service  
          fees as required.  Current law provides that Caltrans may not  
          place a new sign in an urban area designated by the United  
          States Census Bureau as having a population of 5,000 or more.

           This bill  requires Caltrans to allow the placement of business  
          logo signs in an urban area designated by the United States  
          Census Bureau as having a population 50,000 or less if the urban  
          area has had a highway bypass completed since 2002.
          
          COMMENTS:

           1.Purpose of the bill  .  According to the author, this bill is  
            intended to assist communities, such as Lincoln, where  
            businesses have been negatively impacted by the recent opening  




          AB 178 (BETH GAINES)                                   Page 2

                                                                       


            of a bypass.  A bypass diverts traffic from a historic  
            downtown and its fuel and food service providers, but if the  
            city has a population of more than 5000, it currently cannot  
            participate in the Business Logo Signing Program.

           2.Precedent and proliferation of signs  .  The Business Logo  
            Signing Program is intended to help travelers find services in  
            rural areas, where not all exits provide services.  In larger  
            towns and cities, like Lincoln, it is assumed that travelers  
            know that almost all exits have services.  As a result, this  
            bill seems less designed to assist travelers than to help  
            businesses advertise in the public right of way.  In addition,  
            this bill is likely to set a precedent for other non-rural  
            cities without bypasses to seek similar treatment, because  
            their businesses would equally benefit from highway  
            advertising.  There does not seem to be much policy rationale  
            for using the existence of a recent or future bypass as a  
            threshold for allowing business logo signs. Ultimately,  
            expanding the business logo program will result in more  
            highway signage.  The proliferation of signs has often been of  
            concern to the committee because it adds to driver distraction  
            and dilutes attention to highway safety signs.  The committee  
            may wish to consider whether this bill is consistent with the  
            intent of the business logo program and whether it will lead  
            to further expansions of the program and an unsafe  
            proliferation of signs.    

           3.Six is the limit  .  Business logo signs can accommodate only  
            six logos, and Caltrans does not install more than one sign  
            per type of service (i.e., food, gas, lodging).  To address  
            situations in which there are more qualified applicants than  
            available logo spaces, Caltrans has developed a priority  
            system.  For lodging and camping signs, Caltrans prioritizes  
            businesses that are closest to the highway.  For food and fuel  
            signs, priority is based on a point system that values  
            proximity to the highway and longer hours of operation.  In  
            such situations, some businesses are left off the signs and  
            suffer a competitive disadvantage.  These situations are more  
            likely to occur in larger cities that this bill covers where  
            more businesses are likely to exist.  As a result, this bill  
            may inadvertently insert government into the competitive  
            market by giving some businesses an advertising advantage. 
           
          4.Not just author's district  .  This bill affects not just  
            Lincoln but any city with a population of less than 50,000  
            where a highway bypass has been constructed in the last decade  




          AB 178 (BETH GAINES)                                   Page 3

                                                                       


            or is in the works.  The bill would thus apply to Brawley,  
            Willits, Los Banos, Amador, and Angel's Camp.  
          
          Assembly Votes:
               Floor:    76-0
               Appr: 17-0
               Trans:    16-0

          POSITIONS:  (Communicated to the committee before noon on  
          Wednesday,                                             May 29,  
          2013.)

               SUPPORT:  League of California Cities
                         Lincoln Area Chamber of Commerce

               OPPOSED:  None received.